From the Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island (KJK, WC, OAP, MRB, GPA, EMB); Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (LMT); Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Albert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (RKA); Orthopedic Program in Clinical/Translational Research, Warren Albert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (RKA); Miriam Hospital Total Joint Replacement Center, Providence, Rhode Island (RKA); and Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (DP).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jan 1;102(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002006. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
We sought to systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of prehabilitation interventions for patients who are scheduled to undergo elective, unilateral total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty surgery for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2005, through May 3, 2021. We selected for inclusion randomized controlled trials and adequately adjusted nonrandomized comparative studies of prehabilitation programs reporting performance-based, patient-reported, or healthcare utilization outcomes. Three researchers extracted study data and assessed risk of bias, verified by an independent researcher. Experts in rehabilitation content and complex interventions independently coded rehabilitation interventions. The team assessed strength of evidence. While large heterogeneity across evaluated prehabilitation programs limited strong conclusions, evidence from 13 total knee arthroplasty randomized controlled trials suggest that prehabilitation may result in increased strength and reduced length of stay and may not lead to increased harms but may be comparable in terms of pain, range of motion, and activities of daily living (all low strength of evidence). There was no evidence or insufficient evidence for all other outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Although there were six total hip arthroplasty randomized controlled trials, there was no evidence or insufficient evidence for all total hip arthroplasty outcomes.
我们旨在系统地回顾关于接受择期单侧全膝关节置换术或全髋关节置换术治疗原发性骨关节炎的患者的术前康复干预的益处和危害的证据。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间从 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 3 日。我们选择了包括术前康复计划的随机对照试验和充分调整的非随机对照研究,这些研究报告了基于表现、患者报告或医疗保健利用的结果。三位研究人员提取了研究数据并评估了风险偏倚,由独立研究人员进行了验证。康复内容和复杂干预方面的专家独立对康复干预措施进行了编码。该团队评估了证据的强度。虽然评估的术前康复计划之间存在很大的异质性,限制了得出强有力的结论,但来自 13 项全膝关节置换术随机对照试验的证据表明,术前康复可能会导致力量增加和住院时间缩短,并且可能不会增加危害,但在疼痛、活动范围和日常生活活动方面可能相似(所有证据强度均较低)。全膝关节置换术后的所有其他结果均没有证据或证据不足。尽管有 6 项全髋关节置换术随机对照试验,但全髋关节置换术后的所有结果均没有证据或证据不足。