• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持研究人员进行知识转化,并将其研究成果传播出去,以提高可用性和影响力。

Supporting researchers in knowledge translation and dissemination of their research to increase usability and impact.

机构信息

Strategy and Research, HSE Research and Development, Jervis House, Jervis Street, Dublin 1, Ireland.

HSE Research and Evidence, Strategy and Research, 4th Floor, Jervis House, Jervis Street, Dublin 1, Ireland.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2022 Oct;31(10):2959-2968. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03122-1. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-022-03122-1
PMID:35303224
Abstract

PURPOSE

One of the key areas of delivery of the 'Action Plan for Health Research 2019-2029', for the Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland, is adding value and using data and knowledge, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), for improved health care, service delivery and better population health and wellbeing. The development of governance, management and support framework and mechanisms will provide a structure for ensuring research is relevant to the organisation's service plan, well designed, has a clear plan for dissemination and translation of knowledge, and minimises research waste. Developing a process for the translation, dissemination and impact of research is part of the approach to improving translation of research into practice and aligning it with knowledge gaps. A project was undertaken to develop a clear, unified, universally applicable approach for the translation, dissemination, and impact of research undertaken by HSE staff and commissioned, sponsored, or hosted by the organisation. This included the development of guidance, training, and information for researchers.

METHODS

Through an iterative process, an interdisciplinary working group of experts in knowledge translation (KT), implementation science, quality improvement and research management, identified KT frameworks and tools to form a KT, dissemination, and impact process for the HSE. This involved a literature review, screening of 247 KT theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs), review of 18 TMFs selected as usable and applicable to the HSE, selection of 11 for further review, and final review of 6 TMFs in a consensus workshop. An anonymous online survey of HSE researchers, consisting of a mixture of multiple choice and free text questions, was undertaken to inform the development of the guidance and training.

RESULTS

A pilot of the KT process and guidance, involving HSE researchers testing its use at various stages of their research, demonstrated the need to guide researchers through planning, stakeholder engagement, and disseminating research knowledge, and provide information that could easily be understood by novice as well as more experienced researchers. A survey of all active researchers across the organisation identified their support and knowledge requirements and led to the development of accompanying guidance to support researchers in the use of the process. Researchers of all levels reported that they struggled to engage with stakeholders, including evidence users and policy makers, to optimise the impact of their research. They wanted tools that would support better engagement and maximise the value of KT. As a result of the project a range of information, guidance, and training resources have been developed.

CONCLUSION

KT is a complex area and researchers need support to ensure they maximise the value of their research. The KT process outlined enables the distilling of a clear message, provides a process to engage with stakeholders, create a plan to incorporate local and political context, and can show a means to evaluate how much the findings are applied in practice. This is a beneficial application of KT in the field of patient reported outcomes. In implementing this work, we have reinforced the message that stakeholder engagement is crucial from the start of the research study and increases engagement in, and ownership of, the research knowledge.

摘要

目的

爱尔兰卫生服务执行局(HSE)“2019-2029 年卫生研究行动计划”的重点领域之一是增加价值并利用数据和知识,包括与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL),以改善医疗保健、服务提供并提高人口健康和幸福感。制定治理、管理和支持框架和机制将为确保研究与组织服务计划相关、设计良好、有明确的知识传播和转化计划以及最大限度地减少研究浪费提供结构。开发研究翻译、传播和影响的流程是改进研究转化为实践并使其与知识差距保持一致的方法的一部分。开展了一个项目,以制定一个明确、统一、普遍适用的方法,用于 HSE 员工开展的研究以及由该组织委托、赞助或主办的研究的翻译、传播和影响。这包括为研究人员制定指导、培训和信息。

方法

通过迭代过程,一个由知识转化(KT)、实施科学、质量改进和研究管理方面的专家组成的跨学科工作组确定了 KT 框架和工具,以形成 HSE 的 KT、传播和影响流程。这涉及文献回顾、筛选 247 种 KT 理论、模型和框架(TMFs)、审查选定的 18 种可用于和适用于 HSE 的 TMFs、选择 11 种进行进一步审查以及在共识研讨会上最终审查 6 种 TMFs。对 HSE 研究人员进行了一项包含多项选择题和自由文本问题的混合的匿名在线调查,为指导的制定提供了信息。

结果

对 KT 流程和指导的试点,涉及 HSE 研究人员在研究的各个阶段测试其使用情况,表明需要指导研究人员进行规划、利益相关者参与和传播研究知识,并提供新手和更有经验的研究人员都能轻松理解的信息。对组织内所有活跃研究人员的调查确定了他们的支持和知识需求,并导致了配套指导的开发,以支持研究人员使用该流程。各级研究人员都报告说,他们难以与利益相关者(包括证据使用者和政策制定者)接触,以最大限度地提高研究的影响力。他们希望有工具可以帮助他们更好地参与并最大限度地发挥 KT 的价值。由于该项目,已经开发了一系列信息、指导和培训资源。

结论

KT 是一个复杂的领域,研究人员需要支持以确保他们最大限度地发挥研究的价值。概述的 KT 流程可提炼出明确的信息,提供与利益相关者接触的流程,制定纳入当地和政治背景的计划,并可以展示评估研究结果在实践中应用程度的方法。这是患者报告结局领域 KT 的有益应用。在实施这项工作时,我们加强了一个信息,即从研究开始就进行利益相关者参与至关重要,这可以提高对研究知识的参与度和所有权。

相似文献

1
Supporting researchers in knowledge translation and dissemination of their research to increase usability and impact.支持研究人员进行知识转化,并将其研究成果传播出去,以提高可用性和影响力。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Oct;31(10):2959-2968. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03122-1. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
The usability and applicability of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks for research in the context of a national health service.知识转化理论、模型和框架在国家卫生服务背景下用于研究的可用性和适用性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jul 26;19(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00747-5.
3
A scoping review of full-spectrum knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks.全范围知识转化理论、模型和框架的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2020 Feb 14;15(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0964-5.
4
Protocol of a scoping review on knowledge translation competencies.知识转化能力范围综述研究方案
Syst Rev. 2017 May 2;6(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0481-z.
5
Strengthening population health interventions: developing the CollaboraKTion Framework for Community-Based Knowledge Translation.加强人群健康干预措施:制定基于社区的知识转化协作框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Aug 30;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0138-8.
6
Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.利益相关者参与共同制定与政策相关的知识,以促进发展性残疾人士的就业。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00548-2.
7
Knowledge Translation Research to Promote Behavior Changes in Rehabilitation: Use of Theoretical Frameworks and Tailored Interventions: A Scoping Review.知识转化研究促进康复行为改变:理论框架和定制干预措施的使用:范围综述。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul;103(7S):S276-S296. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.076. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
8
Experiences of knowledge translation among researchers in transfusion medicine: Findings from an international survey study.输血医学研究人员在知识转化方面的经验:一项国际调查研究的结果。
Transfusion. 2023 Aug;63(8):1463-1471. doi: 10.1111/trf.17466. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
9
Considerations for Health Researchers Using Social Media for Knowledge Translation: Multiple Case Study.社交媒体在知识转化中的应用:考虑健康研究人员——多案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 23;22(7):e15121. doi: 10.2196/15121.
10
Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries.审查在中低收入国家的研究人员和研究机构中知识转化能力、实践和支持方面的已发表证据。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 10;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0524-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes and perceptions regarding knowledge translation and community engagement in medical research: the PERSPECT qualitative study.关于医学研究中知识转化与社区参与的态度和认知:PERSPECT定性研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 3;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01306-y.
2
The Acceptability, Safety and Impact of a Play Co-Developed With Public Contributors as a Format for Disseminating Research on a Sensitive Subject.公众共同创作的剧本对传播敏感主题研究的可接受性、安全性和影响。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70074. doi: 10.1111/hex.70074.
3
Meaningful patient and public engagement in dissemination-embedding co-production in dementia research.

本文引用的文献

1
Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society.方法重于指标:当前的科学标准对患者和社会不利。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
EMTReK: An Evidence-based Model for the Transfer & Exchange of Research Knowledge-Five Case Studies in Palliative Care.EMTReK:研究知识转移与交流的循证模型——姑息治疗的五个案例研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 Jul 26;5:2377960819861854. doi: 10.1177/2377960819861854. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
3
A scoping review of full-spectrum knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks.
患者和公众有意义地参与痴呆症研究中传播-嵌入联合生产。
Front Dement. 2024 Sep 16;3:1426019. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1426019. eCollection 2024.
4
Protocol Development for a Qualitative Methodological Study Within a Trial (Qual-SWAT): The KARMA-Dep-2 Trial.试验中定性方法学研究的方案制定(定性-试验协作组研究方法):KARMA-Dep-2试验
HRB Open Res. 2023 Nov 20;6:29. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13721.2. eCollection 2023.
5
Dissemination of public health research to prevent non-communicable diseases: a scoping review.向公众传播预防非传染性疾病的公共卫生研究:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15622-x.
6
Introduction to the special section "Reducing research waste in (health-related) quality of life research".“减少(与健康相关的)生活质量研究中的研究浪费”专题介绍
Qual Life Res. 2022 Oct;31(10):2881-2887. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03194-z.
全范围知识转化理论、模型和框架的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2020 Feb 14;15(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0964-5.
4
Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review.卫生服务研究中知识转移和交流的关键组成部分:系统范围综述的结果。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):313-326. doi: 10.1111/jan.13836. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
5
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management.提高生物医学研究监管和管理的价值并减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):176-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62297-7. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
6
The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.新型计算机决策辅助工具对结直肠癌筛查中共同决策的影响:一项随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):93-107. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10369007. Epub 2010 May 18.
7
Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward?将科学发现转化为公共卫生行动:公共卫生学院如何推动我们前进?
Public Health Rep. 2006 Jan-Feb;121(1):97-103. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100118.
8
Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective.社会认知理论:一种能动视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.