School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Transfusion. 2023 Aug;63(8):1463-1471. doi: 10.1111/trf.17466. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
Translation of research knowledge is critical to ensure transfusion medicine policies and practices reflect current evidence and so effectively support the health of blood donors and recipients, as well as ensuring ongoing blood supply. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and facilitators of knowledge translation (KT) among transfusion medicine researchers and determine what KT supports are needed.
An anonymous, cross-sectional survey was distributed by emailing corresponding authors of papers in four major blood journals, emailing grant recipients in the area of transfusion medicine, posting on social media, and through an international blood operator network.
The final sample included 105 researchers. Participants had a positive orientation toward KT, with few perceiving KT as not relevant to their research or beneficial for their careers. However, many reported facing difficulties practicing KT due to time constraints, competing priorities, or lack of funds or resources. Fostering relationships with stakeholders was seen as a key facilitator of KT but a number of researchers expressed difficulties engaging and communicating with them. Collaboration opportunities, protected time for KT, and access to KT resources were some of the supports researchers felt were required to help their KT efforts.
To minimize the knowledge to practice gap in transfusion medicine and ensure findings from research lead to improved outcomes, organizations need to support researchers in their KT efforts and facilitate interactions between researchers and research end-users.
将研究知识进行转化对于确保输血医学的政策和实践能够反映当前的证据至关重要,这将有助于有效保障献血者和受血者的健康,并确保持续的血液供应。本研究旨在调查输血医学研究人员在知识转化(KT)方面的障碍和促进因素,并确定需要哪些 KT 支持。
通过向四大血液期刊的论文通讯作者发送电子邮件、向输血医学领域的资助接受者发送电子邮件、在社交媒体上发布信息以及通过国际血液运营商网络,分发了一份匿名的横断面调查。
最终样本包括 105 名研究人员。参与者对 KT 持积极态度,很少有人认为 KT 与他们的研究无关或对他们的职业发展没有好处。然而,许多人报告说由于时间限制、优先事项竞争或缺乏资金或资源,他们在实践 KT 方面遇到了困难。与利益相关者建立关系被视为 KT 的关键促进因素,但一些研究人员表示在与他们接触和沟通方面存在困难。合作机会、用于 KT 的专用时间以及获取 KT 资源是研究人员认为有助于其 KT 工作的一些支持。
为了最大限度地缩小输血医学中知识到实践的差距,并确保研究结果能够改善成果,组织需要支持研究人员的 KT 工作,并促进研究人员和研究最终用户之间的互动。