• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两名助产士在第二产程中的作用以减少严重会阴创伤(Oneplus):瑞典的一项多中心随机对照试验。

The effect of two midwives during the second stage of labour to reduce severe perineal trauma (Oneplus): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in Sweden.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet. 2022 Mar 26;399(10331):1242-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00188-X. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00188-X
PMID:35303474
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe perineal trauma (SPT) affecting the anal sphincter muscle complex is a serious complication following childbirth, associated with short-term and long-term maternal morbidity. Effective preventive strategies are still scarce. The aim of the Oneplus trial was to test the hypothesis that the presence of a second midwife during the second stage of labour, with the purpose of preventing SPT, would result in fewer injuries affecting the anal sphincter than if attended by one midwife.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, controlled parallel group, unmasked trial done at five obstetric units in Sweden, women were randomly assigned to be assisted by either one or two midwives in late second stage. Nulliparous women and women planning the first vaginal birth after caesarean section who were age 18-47 years were randomly assigned to an intervention when reaching the second stage of labour. Further inclusion criteria were gestational week 37+0, carrying a singleton live fetus in vertex presentation, and proficiency in either Swedish, English, Arabic, or Farsi. Exclusion criteria were a multiple pregnancy, intrauterine fetal demise, a planned caesarean section, or women who were less than 37 weeks pregnant. Randomisation to the intervention group of two midwives or standard care group of one midwife (1:1) was done using a computer-based program and treatment groups were allocated by use of sealed opaque envelopes. All women and midwives were aware of the group assignment, but the statistician from Clinical Studies Forum South, who did the analyses, was masked to group assignment. Midwives were instructed to implement existing prevention models and the second midwife was to assist on instruction of the primary midwife, when asked. Midwives were also instructed to complete case report forms detailing assistance techniques and perineal trauma prevention techniques. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who had SPT, for which odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and logistic regression was done to adjust for study site. All analyses were done according to intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0377096.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 10, 2018, and March 21, 2020, 8866 women were assessed for eligibility, and 4264 met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. 3776 (88·5%) of 4264 women were randomly assigned to an intervention after reaching the second stage of labour. 1892 women were assigned to collegial assistance (two midwives) during the second stage of labour and 1884 women were assigned to standard care (one midwife). 13 women in each group did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. After further exclusions, 1546 women spontaneously gave birth in the intervention group and 1513 in the standard care group. 1546 women in the intervention group and 1513 in the standard care group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. There was a significant reduction in SPT in the intervention group (3·9% [61 of 1546] vs 5·7% [86 of 1513]; adjusted OR 0·69 (0·49-0·97).

INTERPRETATION

The presence of two midwives during the active second stage can reduce SPT in women giving birth for the first time.

FUNDING

The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare; Jan Hains Research Foundation; and Skane County Council's Research and Development Foundation.

摘要

背景

严重的会阴创伤(SPT)影响肛门括约肌复合体,是分娩后严重的并发症,与短期和长期产妇发病率有关。有效的预防策略仍然很少。Oneplus 试验的目的是检验这样一个假设,即在第二产程中增加一名助产士,目的是预防 SPT,与由一名助产士接生相比,会导致更少的肛门括约肌损伤。

方法

在瑞典五家产科单位进行的这项多中心、随机、对照平行组、非盲试验中,妇女在第二产程中随机分配由一名或两名助产士协助。初产妇和计划经剖宫产分娩后的第一次阴道分娩的妇女,年龄在 18-47 岁之间,当达到第二产程时随机分配到干预组。进一步的纳入标准是妊娠周 37+0,携带头位单胎活胎,以及熟练掌握瑞典语、英语、阿拉伯语或波斯语。排除标准是多胎妊娠、宫内胎儿死亡、计划剖宫产或妊娠不足 37 周的妇女。干预组(两名助产士)和标准护理组(一名助产士)(1:1)的随机分组使用基于计算机的程序进行,通过使用密封的不透明信封分配治疗组。所有妇女和助产士都知道分组情况,但负责进行分析的临床研究论坛南部的统计学家对分组情况不知情。助产士被指示实施现有的预防模式,当被初级助产士要求时,第二名助产士应根据指令协助。助产士还被指示填写详细说明协助技术和会阴创伤预防技术的病例报告表。主要结局是发生 SPT 的妇女比例,计算了比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间,并进行了 logistic 回归以调整研究地点。所有分析均根据意向治疗进行。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT0377096。

结果

在 2018 年 12 月 10 日至 2020 年 3 月 21 日期间,对 8866 名妇女进行了资格评估,4264 名符合纳入标准并同意参加。4264 名妇女中,3776 名(88.5%)在达到第二产程后随机分配到干预组。1892 名妇女在第二产程中接受协同协助(两名助产士),1884 名妇女接受标准护理(一名助产士)。每组各有 13 名妇女不符合纳入标准并被排除在外。进一步排除后,1546 名妇女在干预组自然分娩,1513 名妇女在标准护理组自然分娩。1546 名干预组和 1513 名标准护理组妇女被纳入主要结局的意向治疗分析。干预组 SPT 发生率显著降低(3.9%[61/1546]vs 5.7%[86/1513];调整后的 OR 0.69[0.49-0.97])。

结论

在初产妇的活跃第二产程中增加两名助产士可以减少 SPT。

资金

瑞典研究委员会、健康、工作生活和福利;Jan Hains 研究基金会;以及斯科讷省议会的研究与发展基金会。

相似文献

1
The effect of two midwives during the second stage of labour to reduce severe perineal trauma (Oneplus): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in Sweden.两名助产士在第二产程中的作用以减少严重会阴创伤(Oneplus):瑞典的一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2022 Mar 26;399(10331):1242-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00188-X. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
2
Impact of collegial midwifery assistance during second stage of labour on women's experience: a follow-up from the Swedish Oneplus randomised controlled trial.产程第二阶段助产士团队协助对产妇体验的影响:来自瑞典 Oneplus 随机对照试验的随访。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 27;14(7):e077458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077458.
3
One Plus One Equals Two-will that do? A trial protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a clinical practice to reduce severe perineal trauma {1}.一加一等于二——这样可以吗?一项瑞典多中心随机对照试验的试验方案,旨在评估一项减少严重会阴创伤的临床实践{1}。
Trials. 2020 Nov 23;21(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04837-7.
4
Women's experiences of being assisted by two midwives during the active second stage of labour: Secondary outcomes from the Oneplus trial.两名助产士在产程活跃期为产妇提供辅助:Oneplus 试验的次要结局。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2024 Mar;39:100926. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100926. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
5
Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial.任何风险级别的产妇接受病例负载助产护理与标准产科护理的效果比较:M@NGO,一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1723-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61406-3. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
6
'Soothing the ring of fire': Australian women's and midwives' experiences of using perineal warm packs in the second stage of labour.“缓解分娩剧痛”:澳大利亚女性和助产士在第二产程中使用会阴热敷袋的经历
Midwifery. 2009 Apr;25(2):e39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.助产连续性护理与标准产科护理对早产风险增加的妇女:英国混合实施效果随机对照试点试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 6;17(10):e1003350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003350. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial.《在 Labour Progression Study (LaPS) 中,使用 WHO 产程图与 Zhang 指南比较的产时剖宫产频率:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验》
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):340-348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31991-3. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
9
Primary midwives' experiences of collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labor: Data from the Oneplus trial.初产妇在活跃期第二产程中获得助产学同行协助的体验:来自 Oneplus 试验的数据。
Birth. 2023 Dec;50(4):868-876. doi: 10.1111/birt.12739. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
10
Midwives' experiences of professional learning when practicing collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labour: data from the oneplus trial.导乐在活跃第二产程中实施同伴助产协助时的专业学习体验:来自 oneplus 试验的数据。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06499-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's experiences of life and healthcare after levator ani avulsion: a qualitative interview study.肛提肌撕裂后女性的生活与医疗保健经历:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03892-z.
2
Effectiveness of education and training programmes to help clinicians assess and classify perineal tears: a systematic review.帮助临床医生评估和分类会阴撕裂的教育培训项目的有效性:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 25;15(6):e095961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095961.
3
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter?
医院产科工作量与孕产妇结局:医院规模重要吗?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):55-67. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14980. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
4
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma and postpartum complications.第二产程中的会阴保护技术,以减少会阴创伤和产后并发症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 28;10(10):CD016148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016148.
5
Postpartum perineal pain and its association with sub-classified second-degree tears and perineal trauma-A follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.产后会阴疼痛及其与亚类 II 度撕裂和会阴创伤的关系:一项随机对照试验的随访。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Nov;103(11):2314-2323. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14938. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
6
Impact of collegial midwifery assistance during second stage of labour on women's experience: a follow-up from the Swedish Oneplus randomised controlled trial.产程第二阶段助产士团队协助对产妇体验的影响:来自瑞典 Oneplus 随机对照试验的随访。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 27;14(7):e077458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077458.
7
Informed consent to midwifery practices and interventions during the second stage of labor-An observational study within the Oneplus trial.产妇知情同意选择第二产程助产实践和干预措施:一项在 Oneplus 试验中的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 12;19(6):e0304418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304418. eCollection 2024.
8
Midwives' practices on perineal protection and episiotomy decision-making: A qualitative and descriptive study.助产士会阴保护及会阴切开术决策实践:一项定性与描述性研究
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 May 10;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/174126. eCollection 2024.
9
Midwives' experiences of professional learning when practicing collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labour: data from the oneplus trial.导乐在活跃第二产程中实施同伴助产协助时的专业学习体验:来自 oneplus 试验的数据。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06499-8.
10
Maternal and pregnancy predictive risk factors for having a compensated maternal injury claim: a Swedish nationwide cohort study.产妇和妊娠预测风险因素与获得补偿性产妇伤害索赔:一项瑞典全国队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 8;13(1):21731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49234-7.