Suppr超能文献

淋巴结阳性对数比作为结直肠癌新的预后预测指标的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

State key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, P.R. China.

School of Aerospace Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09390-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in the world, which remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. Accurate prognosis prediction of CRC is pivotal to reduce the mortality and disease burden. Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one of the most commonly used criteria to predict prognosis in CRC patients. However, inaccurate surgical dissection and pathological evaluation may lead to inaccurate nodal staging, affecting the effectiveness of pathological N (pN) classification in survival prediction among patients with CRC. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to estimate the prognostic value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in patients with CRC.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies from inception to July 3, 2021. Statistical analyses were performed on Stata statistical software Version 16.0 software. To statistically assess the prognostic effects of LODDS, we extracted the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) from the included studies.

RESULTS

Ten eligible articles published in English involving 3523 cases were analyzed in this study. The results showed that LODDS1 and LODDS2 in CRC patients was correlated with poor OS compared with LODDS0 (LODDS1 vs. LODDS0: HR = 1.77, 95% CI (1.38, 2.28); LODDS2 vs. LODDS0: HR = 3.49, 95% CI (2.88, 4.23)). Meanwhile, LODDS1 and LODDS2 in CRC patients was correlated with poor DFS compared with LODDS0 (LODDS1 vs. LODDS0: HR = 1.82, 95% CI (1.23, 2.68); LODDS2 vs. LODDS0: HR =3.30, 95% CI (1.74, 6.27)).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that the LODDS stage was associated with prognosis of CRC patients and could accurately predict the prognosis of patients with CRC.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)是世界上第三大常见癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。准确预测 CRC 的预后对于降低死亡率和疾病负担至关重要。淋巴结(LN)转移是预测 CRC 患者预后最常用的标准之一。然而,不准确的手术解剖和病理评估可能导致不准确的淋巴结分期,影响 CRC 患者病理 N(pN)分类在生存预测中的有效性。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在估计 CRC 患者阳性淋巴结对数优势比(LODDS)的预后价值。

方法

系统检索了从成立到 2021 年 7 月 3 日的 PubMed、Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆中相关研究。使用 Stata 统计软件版本 16.0 软件进行统计分析。为了统计评估 LODDS 的预后影响,我们从纳入的研究中提取了总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

本研究分析了 10 篇发表在英语中的符合条件的文章,共涉及 3523 例病例。结果表明,CRC 患者的 LODDS1 和 LODDS2 与 OS 不良相关,与 LODDS0 相比(LODDS1 与 LODDS0:HR=1.77,95%CI(1.38,2.28);LODDS2 与 LODDS0:HR=3.49,95%CI(2.88,4.23))。同时,CRC 患者的 LODDS1 和 LODDS2 与 DFS 不良相关,与 LODDS0 相比(LODDS1 与 LODDS0:HR=1.82,95%CI(1.23,2.68);LODDS2 与 LODDS0:HR=3.30,95%CI(1.74,6.27))。

结论

结果表明,LODDS 分期与 CRC 患者的预后相关,可准确预测 CRC 患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee3/8932253/a351a4a94132/12885_2022_9390_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验