• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的 ICU 心力衰竭患者院内死亡率风险分层工具。

A machine learning-based risk stratification tool for in-hospital mortality of intensive care unit patients with heart failure.

机构信息

South China Normal University-Panyu Central Hospital Joint Laboratory of Basic and Translational Medical Research, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400, Guangdong, China.

School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

J Transl Med. 2022 Mar 18;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03340-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12967-022-03340-8
PMID:35303896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8932070/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Predicting hospital mortality risk is essential for the care of heart failure patients, especially for those in intensive care units.

METHODS

Using a novel machine learning algorithm, we constructed a risk stratification tool that correlated patients' clinical features and in-hospital mortality. We used the extreme gradient boosting algorithm to generate a model predicting the mortality risk of heart failure patients in the intensive care unit in the derivation dataset of 5676 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. The logistic regression model and a common risk score for mortality were used for comparison. The eICU Collaborative Research Database dataset was used for external validation.

RESULTS

The performance of the machine learning model was superior to that of conventional risk predictive methods, with the area under curve 0.831 (95% CI 0.820-0.843) and acceptable calibration. In external validation, the model had an area under the curve of 0.809 (95% CI 0.805-0.814). Risk stratification through the model was specific when the hospital mortality was very low, low, moderate, high, and very high (2.0%, 10.2%, 11.5%, 21.2% and 56.2%, respectively). The decision curve analysis verified that the machine learning model is the best clinically valuable in predicting mortality risk.

CONCLUSION

Using readily available clinical data in the intensive care unit, we built a machine learning-based mortality risk tool with prediction accuracy superior to that of linear regression model and common risk scores. The risk tool may support clinicians in assessing individual patients and making individualized treatment.

摘要

背景

预测医院死亡率风险对于心力衰竭患者的护理至关重要,尤其是对于那些在重症监护病房中的患者。

方法

我们使用一种新颖的机器学习算法,构建了一种风险分层工具,该工具与患者的临床特征和住院死亡率相关。我们使用极端梯度提升算法,从 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III 数据库中 5676 例患者的推导数据集生成了一个预测重症监护病房心力衰竭患者死亡率风险的模型。该模型与逻辑回归模型和常用的死亡率风险评分进行了比较。我们使用 eICU 协作研究数据库数据集进行外部验证。

结果

机器学习模型的性能优于传统风险预测方法,曲线下面积为 0.831(95%CI 0.820-0.843),校准效果可接受。在外部验证中,该模型的曲线下面积为 0.809(95%CI 0.805-0.814)。当医院死亡率非常低、低、中、高和非常高时(分别为 2.0%、10.2%、11.5%、21.2%和 56.2%),该模型的风险分层具有特异性。决策曲线分析验证了机器学习模型在预测死亡率风险方面具有最佳的临床价值。

结论

我们使用重症监护病房中易于获得的临床数据,构建了一种基于机器学习的死亡率风险工具,其预测准确性优于线性回归模型和常用风险评分。该风险工具可能有助于临床医生评估个体患者并制定个体化治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/630c3145001c/12967_2022_3340_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/5b554cdb449f/12967_2022_3340_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/70a16d16cb60/12967_2022_3340_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/b8bcf4e1cea0/12967_2022_3340_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/630c3145001c/12967_2022_3340_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/5b554cdb449f/12967_2022_3340_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/70a16d16cb60/12967_2022_3340_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/b8bcf4e1cea0/12967_2022_3340_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1777/8932070/630c3145001c/12967_2022_3340_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A machine learning-based risk stratification tool for in-hospital mortality of intensive care unit patients with heart failure.基于机器学习的 ICU 心力衰竭患者院内死亡率风险分层工具。
J Transl Med. 2022 Mar 18;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03340-8.
2
Prediction model of in-hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients with heart failure: machine learning-based, retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III database.基于机器学习的 MIMIC-III 数据库回顾性分析:预测 ICU 心力衰竭患者院内死亡率的模型。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 23;11(7):e044779. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044779.
3
A Novel Composite Indicator of Predicting Mortality Risk for Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Admitted to Intensive Care Unit Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的 ICU 收治糖尿病心力衰竭患者死亡风险预测的新型综合指标。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;13:917838. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.917838. eCollection 2022.
4
Machine learning-based in-hospital mortality risk prediction tool for intensive care unit patients with heart failure.基于机器学习的心力衰竭重症监护病房患者院内死亡风险预测工具。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 3;10:1119699. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1119699. eCollection 2023.
5
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
6
Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in lung cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit.机器学习在预测 ICU 收治的肺癌患者院内死亡率中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280606. eCollection 2023.
7
Machine learning prediction models and nomogram to predict the risk of in-hospital death for severe DKA: A clinical study based on MIMIC-IV, eICU databases, and a college hospital ICU.基于 MIMIC-IV、eICU 数据库和一家大学医院 ICU 的临床研究:机器学习预测模型和诺莫图预测严重 DKA 患者院内死亡风险
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jun;174:105049. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105049. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
8
Comparing ensemble learning algorithms and severity of illness scoring systems in cardiac intensive care units: a retrospective study.比较心脏重症监护病房中的集成学习算法和疾病严重程度评分系统:一项回顾性研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Oct 14;22:eAO0467. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0467. eCollection 2024.
9
A machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with hip fracture: An internal and external validated study.基于机器学习的危重症髋部骨折患者院内死亡率预测模型:内部和外部验证研究。
Injury. 2023 Feb;54(2):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.11.031. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
10
Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.利用可解释机器学习模型预测重症监护病房心力衰竭患者的死亡率:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e38082. doi: 10.2196/38082.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a nomogram prediction model for factors influencing I-refractory Graves' hyperthyroidism.影响碘难治性Graves病甲亢因素的列线图预测模型的开发与验证
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 13;16:1628226. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1628226. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients with coronary heart disease and renal insufficiency.冠心病合并肾功能不全患者院内死亡预测模型的开发与验证
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Jul 1;26:200463. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200463. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
A machine learning-based severity stratification tool for high altitude pulmonary edema.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential applications and performance of machine learning techniques and algorithms in clinical practice: A systematic review.机器学习技术和算法在临床实践中的潜在应用和性能:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar;159:104679. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104679. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
2
Quality of Heart Failure Care in the Intensive Care Unit.心力衰竭患者 ICU 治疗的质量。
J Card Fail. 2021 Oct;27(10):1111-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.001.
3
Thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: balancing on a tightrope.危重症患者的血栓预防:走钢丝般的平衡。
一种基于机器学习的高原肺水肿严重程度分层工具。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02992-y.
4
Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.用于预测心力衰竭死亡率和再入院的机器学习方法评估:荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04700-0.
5
An explainable multi-objective hybrid machine learning model for reducing heart failure mortality.一种用于降低心力衰竭死亡率的可解释多目标混合机器学习模型。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Feb 25;11:e2682. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2682. eCollection 2025.
6
Temporal variations in and predictive values of ABG results prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest.院内心脏骤停前动脉血气分析结果的时间变化及预测价值
J Med Surg Public Health. 2024 Dec;4. doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100143. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
7
Prediction of implant failure risk due to periprosthetic femoral fracture after primary elective total hip arthroplasty : a simplified and validated model based on 154,519 total hip arthroplasties from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.初次择期全髋关节置换术后假体周围股骨骨折导致植入物失败风险的预测:基于瑞典关节置换登记处154,519例全髋关节置换术的简化且经过验证的模型
Bone Joint Res. 2025 Jan 24;14(1):46-57. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.141.BJR-2024-0134.R1.
8
Predictive Value of Machine Learning for the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习对心力衰竭患者院内死亡风险的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jan;48(1):e70071. doi: 10.1002/clc.70071.
9
Predictive Analytics in Heart Failure Risk, Readmission, and Mortality Prediction: A Review.心力衰竭风险、再入院和死亡率预测中的预测分析:综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 17;16(11):e73876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73876. eCollection 2024 Nov.
10
Interpretable mortality prediction model for ICU patients with pneumonia: using shapley additive explanation method.具有肺炎的 ICU 患者可解释死亡率预测模型:使用 Shapley 加法解释方法。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03252-x.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Nov;87(11):1239-1254. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15755-4. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
4
Computational Diagnostic Techniques for Electrocardiogram Signal Analysis.心电图信号分析的计算诊断技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 5;20(21):6318. doi: 10.3390/s20216318.
5
XGBoost-Based Framework for Smoking-Induced Noncommunicable Disease Prediction.基于 XGBoost 的吸烟相关非传染性疾病预测框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 7;17(18):6513. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186513.
6
A review of the management of patients with advanced heart failure in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中晚期心力衰竭患者的管理综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(13):828. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1048.
7
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术与直接口服抗凝剂在伴有心房颤动的高危患者中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067.
8
The development an artificial intelligence algorithm for early sepsis diagnosis in the intensive care unit.开发一种用于重症监护病房早期脓毒症诊断的人工智能算法。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104176. Epub 2020 May 21.
9
Phenomapping of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using machine learning-based unsupervised cluster analysis.基于机器学习的无监督聚类分析对射血分数保留心力衰竭患者的表型分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;22(1):148-158. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1621. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Machine Learning to Predict the Risk of Incident Heart Failure Hospitalization Among Patients With Diabetes: The WATCH-DM Risk Score.机器学习预测糖尿病患者心力衰竭住院风险:WATCH-DM 风险评分。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Dec;42(12):2298-2306. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0587. Epub 2019 Sep 13.