Aarhus University, Arctic Research Centre (ARC), Department of Ecoscience, P.O. Box 358, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3, Canada.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 10;829:154445. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154445. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
There has been a considerable number of reports on Hg concentrations in Arctic mammals since the last Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) effort to review biological effects of the exposure to mercury (Hg) in Arctic biota in 2010 and 2018. Here, we provide an update on the state of the knowledge of health risk associated with Hg concentrations in Arctic marine and terrestrial mammal species. Using available population-specific data post-2000, our ultimate goal is to provide an updated evidence-based estimate of the risk for adverse health effects from Hg exposure in Arctic mammal species at the individual and population level. Tissue residues of Hg in 13 species across the Arctic were classified into five risk categories (from No risk to Severe risk) based on critical tissue concentrations derived from experimental studies on harp seals and mink. Exposure to Hg lead to low or no risk for health effects in most populations of marine and terrestrial mammals, however, subpopulations of polar bears, pilot whales, narwhals, beluga and hooded seals are highly exposed in geographic hotspots raising concern for Hg-induced toxicological effects. About 6% of a total of 3500 individuals, across different marine mammal species, age groups and regions, are at high or severe risk of health effects from Hg exposure. The corresponding figure for the 12 terrestrial species, regions and age groups was as low as 0.3% of a total of 731 individuals analyzed for their Hg loads. Temporal analyses indicated that the proportion of polar bears at low or moderate risk has increased in East/West Greenland and Western Hudson Bay, respectively. However, there remain numerous knowledge gaps to improve risk assessments of Hg exposure in Arctic mammalian species, including the establishment of improved concentration thresholds and upscaling to the assessment of population-level effects.
自 2010 年和 2018 年北极监测和评估方案(AMAP)最后一次努力审查北极生物体内暴露于汞(Hg)的生物效应以来,已经有相当数量的关于北极哺乳动物中 Hg 浓度的报告。在这里,我们提供了与北极海洋和陆地哺乳动物物种中 Hg 浓度相关的健康风险知识现状的最新信息。使用 2000 年后可用的特定于种群的数据,我们的最终目标是提供一个更新的、基于证据的估计,即在个体和种群水平上,北极哺乳动物物种因 Hg 暴露而产生不良健康影响的风险。根据实验研究中关于格陵兰海豹和貂的关键组织浓度,将 13 种北极物种的组织 Hg 残留分为五个风险类别(从无风险到严重风险)。在大多数海洋和陆地哺乳动物种群中,Hg 暴露对健康的影响低或无风险,然而,北极熊、领航鲸、独角鲸、白鲸和冠海豹的亚种群在地理热点地区高度暴露,引起了对 Hg 诱导的毒性作用的关注。在总共 3500 个个体中,约有 6%,来自不同的海洋哺乳动物物种、年龄组和地区,面临 Hg 暴露导致健康影响的高或严重风险。在总共分析了 731 个 Hg 负荷的 12 个陆地物种、地区和年龄组中,这一数字低至 0.3%。时间分析表明,在东/西格陵兰和西哈德逊湾,处于低或中度风险的北极熊比例有所增加。然而,在评估北极哺乳动物物种的 Hg 暴露风险方面,仍然存在许多知识空白,包括建立更好的浓度阈值和扩大到种群水平效应的评估。