Danieu L, Wong G, Koziner B, Clarkson B
Cancer Res. 1986 Oct;46(10):5372-9.
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of a predictive model for response to treatment and survival in advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma. One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients with Ann Arbor stage II-IV diffuse histiocytic lymphoma, who completed treatment between 1974 and 1984 in one of four different Memorial Hospital combination chemotherapy protocols, were reviewed. The median follow-up time was 66.9 months for survivors (range, 21-153.1 months). Factors studied included: age; sex; Ann Arbor stage; prior therapy; B symptoms; serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH); sites of initial disease; and tumor bulk. LDH was grouped accordingly (units/liter): low, less than 225; medium, 225-500; high, greater than 500. Each patient was assigned an overall level of site involvement (LSI) from the following mutually exclusive groups: group I, peripheral lymph node (PLN) (including +/- Waldeyer ring involvement, +/- spleen); group II, extranodal disease (EN) +/- PLN; group III, retroperitoneal lymph node (RLN) +/- PLN; group IV, bulky mediastinal disease (MED) +/- any other disease; group V, EN with RLN +/- PLN. The Ann Arbor staging system failed to dissect patient groups differing significantly in their prognosis. Serum LDH, LSI, and age were the only factors important for predicting response and survival after multivariate logistic regression and a parametric Weibull survival analysis. Using three levels of serum LDH and correlating them with the different LSI, four tentative "stages" differing significantly in their survival at 48 months were defined: stage I, low LDH, any LSI (80% alive); stage II, medium LDH, PLN, and/or EN (50% alive); stage III, high LDH, PLN, and/or EN or medium LDH, RLN +/- PLN +/- EN, and/or MED (35% alive); stage IV, high LDH, RLN +/- PLN +/- EN, and/or MED (15% alive). Identification of prognostic stages on the basis of LDH level and LSI will allow more accurate comparison of clinical trials for patients with advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma.
本研究的目的是检验一种预测模型在晚期弥漫性组织细胞淋巴瘤治疗反应和生存方面的有效性。回顾了1974年至1984年间在纪念医院的四种不同联合化疗方案之一中完成治疗的127例连续的Ann Arbor II-IV期弥漫性组织细胞淋巴瘤患者。幸存者的中位随访时间为66.9个月(范围:21-153.1个月)。研究的因素包括:年龄;性别;Ann Arbor分期;既往治疗;B症状;血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH);初始疾病部位;以及肿瘤体积。LDH按以下方式分组(单位/升):低,低于225;中,225-500;高,高于500。根据以下相互排斥的组为每位患者指定总体部位受累水平(LSI):I组,外周淋巴结(PLN)(包括±Waldeyer环受累,±脾脏);II组,结外疾病(EN)±PLN;III组,腹膜后淋巴结(RLN)±PLN;IV组,巨大纵隔疾病(MED)±任何其他疾病;V组,EN伴RLN±PLN。Ann Arbor分期系统未能区分预后有显著差异的患者组。血清LDH、LSI和年龄是多变量逻辑回归和参数化威布尔生存分析中预测反应和生存的唯一重要因素。使用血清LDH的三个水平并将它们与不同的LSI相关联,定义了在48个月时生存有显著差异的四个暂定“阶段”:I期,低LDH,任何LSI(80%存活);II期,中LDH,PLN和/或EN(50%存活);III期,高LDH,PLN和/或EN或中LDH,RLN±PLN±EN和/或MED(35%存活);IV期,高LDH,RLN±PLN±EN和/或MED(15%存活)。基于LDH水平和LSI确定预后阶段将允许对晚期弥漫性组织细胞淋巴瘤患者的临床试验进行更准确的比较。