• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断标准代码区分真性红细胞增多症和继发性红细胞增多症的潜在局限性。

Potential limitations of diagnostic standard codes to distinguish polycythemia vera and secondary erythrocytosis.

机构信息

Instituto Tecnológico Y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.

Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 18;12(1):4674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08606-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-08606-1
PMID:35304527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8933419/
Abstract

Red cell overproduction is seen in polycythemia vera (PV), a bone marrow myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by trilinear cell proliferation (WBC, platelets), as well as in secondary erythrocytosis (SE), a group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by elevated EPO gene transcription. We aimed to verify the concordance of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code-based diagnosis of "polycythemia" or "erythrocytosis" with the true clinical diagnosis of these conditions. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records (January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016) of adult patients with ICD codes of polycythemia and/or erythrocytosis who had testing done for the presence of the JAK2V617F mutation. We verified the accuracy of the ICD code-based diagnoses by meticulous chart review and established whether these patients fulfilled the criteria by the evaluating physician for PV or SE and according to the World Health Organization 2016 diagnostic guidelines. The reliability of ICD coding was calculated using Cohen's kappa. We identified and chart reviewed a total of 578 patient records. Remarkably, 11% of the patients had concurrent diagnosis codes for PV and SE and were unable to be classified appropriately without individual chart review. The ICD code-based diagnostic system led to misidentification in an important fraction of cases. This represents a problem for the detection of PV or SE cases by ICD-based registries and their derived studies. Research based exclusively on ICD codes could have a potential impact on patient care and public health, and limitations must be weighed when research findings are conveyed.

摘要

红细胞增多可见于真性红细胞增多症(PV),这是一种骨髓髓系增殖性肿瘤,其特征为三系细胞增殖(WBC、血小板),也可见于继发性红细胞增多症(SE),这是一组异质性疾病,其特征为 EPO 基因转录升高。我们旨在验证基于国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的“真性红细胞增多症”或“红细胞增多症”诊断与这些疾病的真实临床诊断之间的一致性。我们回顾性地审查了 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 JAK2V617F 突变检测的 ICD 编码为真性红细胞增多症和/或红细胞增多症的成年患者的电子病历。我们通过仔细的图表审查来验证基于 ICD 编码的诊断的准确性,并根据评估医师的判断确定这些患者是否符合 PV 或 SE 的标准,并根据 2016 年世界卫生组织的诊断指南。使用 Cohen's kappa 计算 ICD 编码的可靠性。我们共确定并审查了 578 例患者的记录。值得注意的是,11%的患者同时有 PV 和 SE 的诊断代码,如果不进行单独的图表审查,就无法进行适当的分类。基于 ICD 的诊断系统在很大一部分病例中导致了错误识别。这代表了基于 ICD 登记和衍生研究检测 PV 或 SE 病例的一个问题。仅基于 ICD 编码的研究可能对患者护理和公共卫生产生潜在影响,在传达研究结果时必须权衡局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8933419/9b92aafb1b5d/41598_2022_8606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8933419/9b92aafb1b5d/41598_2022_8606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8933419/9b92aafb1b5d/41598_2022_8606_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Potential limitations of diagnostic standard codes to distinguish polycythemia vera and secondary erythrocytosis.诊断标准代码区分真性红细胞增多症和继发性红细胞增多症的潜在局限性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 18;12(1):4674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08606-1.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Erythropoietin Levels in Polycythemia Vera: Experience at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.真性红细胞增多症中红细胞生成素水平的诊断性能:综合癌症中心的经验。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Determination of accuracy of polycythemia vera diagnoses and use of the JAK2V617F test in the diagnostic scheme.真性红细胞增多症诊断准确性的确定和 JAK2V617F 检测在诊断方案中的应用。
Ann Hematol. 2014 Sep;93(9):1467-72. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2068-2. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
4
Usefulness of JAK2V617F mutation in distinguishing idiopathic erythrocytosis from polycythemia vera.JAK2V617F突变在鉴别真性红细胞增多症与特发性红细胞增多症中的应用价值。
Leuk Res. 2007 Jan;31(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.02.027. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
5
Application of PRV-1 mRNA expression level and JAK2V617F mutation for the differentiating between polycytemia vera and secondary erythrocytosis and assessment of treatment by interferon or hydroxyurea.PRV-1 mRNA表达水平和JAK2V617F突变在真性红细胞增多症与继发性红细胞增多症鉴别诊断及干扰素或羟基脲治疗评估中的应用
Hematology. 2007 Dec;12(6):473-9. doi: 10.1080/10245330701384005.
6
Current diagnostic criteria for the chronic myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF).慢性骨髓增殖性疾病(MPD)、原发性血小板增多症(ET)、真性红细胞增多症(PV)和慢性特发性骨髓纤维化(CIMF)的现行诊断标准。
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2007 Mar;55(2):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
7
Comparison of diagnostic criteria for polycythaemia vera.真性红细胞增多症诊断标准的比较。
Hematology. 2007 Apr;12(2):123-30. doi: 10.1080/10245330601111797.
8
The role of a low erythropoietin level for the polycythemia vera diagnosis.低促红细胞生成素水平在真性红细胞增多症诊断中的作用。
Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2020 Feb;80:102355. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2019.102355. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
9
Diagnostic value of serum erythropoietin level in patients with absolute erythrocytosis.血清促红细胞生成素水平在真性红细胞增多症患者中的诊断价值。
Haematologica. 2004 Oct;89(10):1194-8.
10
Polycythemia Vera.真性红细胞增多症。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Mar 7;19(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0529-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Performance of Serum Erythropoietin to Discriminate Polycythemia Vera from Secondary Erythrocytosis through Established Subnormal Limits.通过既定的低于正常范围的血清促红细胞生成素鉴别真性红细胞增多症与继发性红细胞增多症的诊断效能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):1902. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171902.
2
Contribution of lowered hemoglobin threshold value in the diagnosis of polycythemia vera: Comparison of 2016 and 2008 WHO criteria.降低血红蛋白阈值在真性红细胞增多症诊断中的作用:2016 年和 2008 年 WHO 标准的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 4;102(31):e34462. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034462.

本文引用的文献

1
Polycythemia vera: historical oversights, diagnostic details, and therapeutic views.真性红细胞增多症:历史的忽视、诊断的细节和治疗的观点。
Leukemia. 2021 Dec;35(12):3339-3351. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01401-3. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
2
Genetic Background of Congenital Erythrocytosis.先天性红细胞增多症的遗传背景。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;12(8):1151. doi: 10.3390/genes12081151.
3
JAK2 unmutated erythrocytosis: current diagnostic approach and therapeutic views.JAK2 未突变红细胞增多症:当前的诊断方法和治疗观点。
Leukemia. 2021 Aug;35(8):2166-2181. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01290-6. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Prevalence of unexplained erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis - an NHANES analysis.不明原因红细胞增多症和血小板增多症的患病率——一项美国国家健康与营养检查调查分析
Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Aug;62(8):2030-2033. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1888377. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
5
Erythrocytosis in the general population: clinical characteristics and association with clonal hematopoiesis.一般人群中的红细胞增多症:临床特征及与克隆性造血的关系。
Blood Adv. 2020 Dec 22;4(24):6353-6363. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003323.
6
Diagnostic Performance of Erythropoietin Levels in Polycythemia Vera: Experience at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.真性红细胞增多症中红细胞生成素水平的诊断性能:综合癌症中心的经验。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
7
Investigation and management of erythrocytosis.红细胞增多症的调查与处理
CMAJ. 2020 Aug 10;192(32):E913-E918. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191587.
8
The TEMPI syndrome.TEMPI 综合征。
Blood. 2020 Apr 9;135(15):1199-1203. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019004216.
9
Update on mutations in the HIF: EPO pathway and their role in erythrocytosis.关于 HIF-EPO 通路突变及其在红细胞增多症中的作用的最新进展。
Blood Rev. 2019 Sep;37:100590. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100590. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Janus kinase 2 variants associated with the transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms into acute myeloid leukemia.与骨髓增生性肿瘤向急性髓系白血病转化相关的 Janus 激酶 2 变异体。
Cancer. 2019 Jun 1;125(11):1855-1866. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31986. Epub 2019 Feb 27.