Instituto Vascular de Passo Fundo (Invasc), R. Capitão Araújo 297/1207, Passo Fundo, RS, 99010-200, Brazil.
Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF), R. Uruguai, 2001/414B, Passo Fundo, RS, 99010-112, Brazil.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):903-910. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03089-z. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
Genicular artery embolization (GAE) has emerged as a treatment option to improve quality of life in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe pain refractory to conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis, with encouraging results. This paper describes the study protocol of a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of GAE using imipenem/cilastatin vs. microspheres for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain associated with knee osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that there will be no difference in safety and efficacy outcomes. The study received ethics approval of the institutional review board with number 4.364.391 / CAAE: 37590820.3.0000.5342 and is registered onto the Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clinicos (ReBEC), with number RBR-2h5rwgb. Technical success was defined as embolization of at least 1 feeding artery supplying the hyperemic synovium of the knee joint. Primary outcome: clinical success was defined as improvement in symptoms, 50% reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scores or an increase of at least 10 points in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score from baseline to 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcome: radiological success was defined as significant improvement in the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score for knee synovitis considering the embolized areas at 12 months of follow-up after GAE and a reduction in the analgesia or other conservative therapies for knee pain used by the patient at 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Clinical assessments will be performed before GAE, during GAE and at hospital discharge (for Visual Analog Scale of pain), and at 30 days, 3 months, and 12 months after GAE.
关节内动脉栓塞术(GAE)已成为一种治疗选择,可以改善对膝骨关节炎的保守治疗有反应的中重度疼痛患者的生活质量,结果令人鼓舞。本文描述了一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估和比较使用亚胺培南/西司他丁与微球治疗与膝骨关节炎相关的中重度疼痛的安全性和疗效。我们假设在安全性和疗效结果方面没有差异。该研究获得了机构审查委员会的伦理批准,编号为 4.364.391 / CAAE:37590820.3.0000.5342,并在巴西临床试验注册处(ReBEC)注册,编号为 RBR-2h5rwgb。技术成功定义为至少栓塞一条供应膝关节充血滑膜的供血动脉。主要结局:临床成功定义为症状改善,Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数疼痛评分降低 50%或膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分至少增加 10 分,与基线相比,随访 3 个月。次要结局:放射学成功定义为在 GAE 后 12 个月时,考虑栓塞区域,全膝关节磁共振成像滑膜炎评分显著改善,以及在 GAE 后 3 和 12 个月时,患者使用的膝关节疼痛镇痛或其他保守治疗减少。临床评估将在 GAE 前、GAE 期间和出院时(疼痛视觉模拟量表)进行,并在 GAE 后 30 天、3 个月和 12 个月进行。