Suppr超能文献

比较分析英国住院和死亡风险与 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)和德尔塔(B.1.617.2)变异株的关系:一项队列研究。

Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study.

机构信息

MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

NIHR Health Protection Research Unit for Modelling and Health Economics, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00462-7. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2 has demonstrated partial vaccine escape and high transmissibility, with early studies indicating lower severity of infection than that of the delta variant (B.1.617.2). We aimed to better characterise omicron severity relative to delta by assessing the relative risk of hospital attendance, hospital admission, or death in a large national cohort.

METHODS

Individual-level data on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases resident in England between Nov 29, 2021, and Jan 9, 2022, were linked to routine datasets on vaccination status, hospital attendance and admission, and mortality. The relative risk of hospital attendance or admission within 14 days, or death within 28 days after confirmed infection, was estimated using proportional hazards regression. Analyses were stratified by test date, 10-year age band, ethnicity, residential region, and vaccination status, and were further adjusted for sex, index of multiple deprivation decile, evidence of a previous infection, and year of age within each age band. A secondary analysis estimated variant-specific and vaccine-specific vaccine effectiveness and the intrinsic relative severity of omicron infection compared with delta (ie, the relative risk in unvaccinated cases).

FINDINGS

The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of hospital attendance (not necessarily resulting in admission) with omicron compared with delta was 0·56 (95% CI 0·54-0·58); for hospital admission and death, HR estimates were 0·41 (0·39-0·43) and 0·31 (0·26-0·37), respectively. Omicron versus delta HR estimates varied with age for all endpoints examined. The adjusted HR for hospital admission was 1·10 (0·85-1·42) in those younger than 10 years, decreasing to 0·25 (0·21-0·30) in 60-69-year-olds, and then increasing to 0·47 (0·40-0·56) in those aged at least 80 years. For both variants, past infection gave some protection against death both in vaccinated (HR 0·47 [0·32-0·68]) and unvaccinated (0·18 [0·06-0·57]) cases. In vaccinated cases, past infection offered no additional protection against hospital admission beyond that provided by vaccination (HR 0·96 [0·88-1·04]); however, for unvaccinated cases, past infection gave moderate protection (HR 0·55 [0·48-0·63]). Omicron versus delta HR estimates were lower for hospital admission (0·30 [0·28-0·32]) in unvaccinated cases than the corresponding HR estimated for all cases in the primary analysis. Booster vaccination with an mRNA vaccine was highly protective against hospitalisation and death in omicron cases (HR for hospital admission 8-11 weeks post-booster vs unvaccinated: 0·22 [0·20-0·24]), with the protection afforded after a booster not being affected by the vaccine used for doses 1 and 2.

INTERPRETATION

The risk of severe outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection is substantially lower for omicron than for delta, with higher reductions for more severe endpoints and significant variation with age. Underlying the observed risks is a larger reduction in intrinsic severity (in unvaccinated individuals) counterbalanced by a reduction in vaccine effectiveness. Documented previous SARS-CoV-2 infection offered some protection against hospitalisation and high protection against death in unvaccinated individuals, but only offered additional protection in vaccinated individuals for the death endpoint. Booster vaccination with mRNA vaccines maintains over 70% protection against hospitalisation and death in breakthrough confirmed omicron infections.

FUNDING

Medical Research Council, UK Research and Innovation, Department of Health and Social Care, National Institute for Health Research, Community Jameel, and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 的 omicron 变体(B.1.1.529)表现出部分疫苗逃逸和高传染性,早期研究表明其感染严重程度低于 delta 变体(B.1.617.2)。我们旨在通过评估在大型全国队列中住院、住院或死亡的相对风险,更好地描述 omicron 与 delta 的严重程度。

方法

将 2021 年 11 月 29 日至 2022 年 1 月 9 日期间居住在英格兰的实验室确诊 COVID-19 病例的个体水平数据与疫苗接种状态、住院和入院以及死亡率的常规数据集相关联。使用比例风险回归估计 14 天内住院或入院或确诊感染后 28 天内死亡的相对风险。分析按测试日期、10 年年龄组、种族、居住地区和疫苗接种状态分层,并进一步调整性别、多重剥夺指数十分位数、先前感染的证据和每个年龄组内的年龄。二次分析估计了变异特异性和疫苗特异性的疫苗有效性以及与 delta 相比 omicron 感染的固有相对严重程度(即,未接种疫苗病例中的相对风险)。

结果

与 delta 相比,omicron 导致医院就诊(不一定需要入院)的调整后的危险比(HR)为 0.56(95%CI 0.54-0.58);对于住院和死亡,HR 估计值分别为 0.41(0.39-0.43)和 0.31(0.26-0.37)。对于所有检查的终点,omicron 与 delta 的 HR 估计值随年龄而变化。在 10 岁以下的人群中,住院的调整后 HR 为 1.10(0.85-1.42),在 60-69 岁的人群中降至 0.25(0.21-0.30),然后在至少 80 岁的人群中增至 0.47(0.40-0.56)。对于两种变体,在接种疫苗的(HR 0.47 [0.32-0.68])和未接种疫苗的(0.18 [0.06-0.57])病例中,既往感染都提供了对死亡的一些保护。在接种疫苗的病例中,既往感染除了疫苗接种提供的保护之外,对住院没有额外的保护(HR 0.96 [0.88-1.04]);然而,对于未接种疫苗的病例,既往感染提供了适度的保护(HR 0.55 [0.48-0.63])。在未接种疫苗的病例中,与主要分析中所有病例的相应 HR 相比,住院的 omicron 与 delta 的 HR 估计值较低(0.30 [0.28-0.32])。在 omicron 病例中,接种 mRNA 疫苗的加强针高度保护住院和死亡(加强针接种后 8-11 周与未接种疫苗的 HR:0.22 [0.20-0.24]),加强针后提供的保护不受第 1 剂和第 2 剂疫苗的影响。

解释

与 delta 相比,SARS-CoV-2 感染后的严重后果风险在 omicron 中要低得多,对于更严重的终点,风险降低幅度更大,且与年龄有显著差异。观察到的风险背后是固有严重程度(在未接种疫苗的个体中)的更大降低,与疫苗效力的降低相平衡。先前记录的 SARS-CoV-2 感染为未接种疫苗的个体提供了一些住院保护,并且为高保护提供了高度保护,但仅为接种疫苗的个体提供了死亡终点的额外保护。mRNA 疫苗的加强针接种在突破性确诊的 omicron 感染中保持了超过 70%的住院和死亡保护。

资金

医学研究理事会、英国研究与创新、英国卫生部和社会保健署、国家卫生研究院、社区贾米尔和工程与物理科学研究理事会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d4/8987935/5ef0fad2155f/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验