• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pandemic Outbreaks and the Language of Violence: Discussing the Origins of the Black Death and COVID-19.大流行病爆发与暴力语言:探讨黑死病和 COVID-19 的起源。
Chest. 2022 Jul;162(1):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study.欧洲SARS-CoV-2疫情期间推特上新冠疫情相关信息传播的时间和地点变化以及链接类别:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e19629. doi: 10.2196/19629.
3
Using Narrative Evidence to Convey Health Information on Social Media: The Case of COVID-19.利用叙事证据在社交媒体上传播健康信息:以新冠疫情为例
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 15;23(3):e24948. doi: 10.2196/24948.
4
Pandemics and education: A historical review.大流行病与教育:历史回顾。
J Dent Educ. 2021 Jun;85(6):741-746. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12615. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Infodemic vs. Pandemic Factors Associated to Public Anxiety in the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.新冠疫情早期公众焦虑的信息疫情与大流行因素关联:中国的一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 30;9:723648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.723648. eCollection 2021.
6
Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation.管理新冠疫情信息疫情的框架:世卫组织在线众包技术磋商会的方法与结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659.
7
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
8
Online Information Exchange and Anxiety Spread in the Early Stage of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak in South Korea: Structural Topic Model and Network Analysis.韩国新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情早期的在线信息交流与焦虑传播:结构主题模型与网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19455. doi: 10.2196/19455.
9
The Figure of the Staggering Rat: Reading Colonial Outbreak Narratives Against the Grain of "Virus Hunting".《摇晃之鼠的形象:逆病毒猎捕的潮流阅读殖民爆发叙事》
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2024 Sep 23;79(4):331-344. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrae004.
10
Impacts of Rumors and Conspiracy Theories Surrounding COVID-19 on Preparedness Programs.新冠病毒相关谣言和阴谋论对防范准备计划的影响。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb;16(1):310-315. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.325. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Bots during the COVID-19 Pandemic.社交媒体上的舆论操纵:新冠疫情期间推特机器人的社交网络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;19(24):16376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416376.

本文引用的文献

1
Science misinformation alarms Francis Collins as he leaves top NIH job.科学错误信息令弗朗西斯·柯林斯在卸任美国国立卫生研究院最高职位时感到警觉。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7889):372-373. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-03611-2.
2
Divisive COVID 'lab leak' debate prompts dire warnings from researchers.关于新冠病毒“实验室泄漏”的分裂性辩论引发了研究人员的严重警告。
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7861):15-16. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01383-3.
3
Investigate the origins of COVID-19.调查新冠病毒的起源。
Science. 2021 May 14;372(6543):694. doi: 10.1126/science.abj0016.
4
Social stigma in the time of coronavirus disease 2019.2019 冠状病毒病时期的社会耻辱。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Aug 13;56(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02461-2020. Print 2020 Aug.
5
Phylogeography of the second plague pandemic revealed through analysis of historical Yersinia pestis genomes.通过分析历史鼠疫耶尔森氏菌基因组揭示第二次鼠疫大流行的系统地理学。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 2;10(1):4470. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12154-0.
6
Analysis of 3800-year-old Yersinia pestis genomes suggests Bronze Age origin for bubonic plague.对 3800 年前鼠疫耶尔森氏菌基因组的分析表明,腺鼠疫起源于青铜时代。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 8;9(1):2234. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04550-9.
7
Historical variations in mutation rate in an epidemic pathogen, Yersinia pestis.鼠疫耶尔森菌流行性病原体的突变率的历史变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):577-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205750110. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

大流行病爆发与暴力语言:探讨黑死病和 COVID-19 的起源。

Pandemic Outbreaks and the Language of Violence: Discussing the Origins of the Black Death and COVID-19.

机构信息

School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.

Department of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC.

出版信息

Chest. 2022 Jul;162(1):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.010
PMID:35305972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8925085/
Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought renewed attention to past narratives of disease outbreaks. What do the Black Death and COVID-19 have in common? How we tell outbreak stories is shaped by political, cultural, social, and historical contexts. It is deeply rhetorical. The general public relies on experts (scientists, historians, and government officials) to provide credible information, but uncertainties during an outbreak can make it difficult to provide definitive answers quickly. Experts need to be conscious about the contexts in which their statements would be received. Regarding the Black Death, historians of medicine have relied heavily on a single medieval account of the outbreak, which confirmed their preconceptions about Mongol violence, allowing them to present the Black Death as an instance of biological warfare. Looking at other medieval accounts, however, makes clear that this narrative of Mongol biological warfare is false. Similarly, modern outbreak narratives also tend to use militarized language, which results in othering peoples and cultures where a disease might have originated. Given the contemporary political tensions between China and the United States, narratives about the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its transmission have led to a transnational infodemic of misinformation as well as discrimination and violence against people of Asian descent. In light of this long-running pattern, we argue for more interdisciplinary collaborations between the experts whose work is used to build outbreak narratives to adopt more critical rhetorical approaches in communicating with the public.

摘要

新冠疫情的爆发让人们重新关注到过去的疾病爆发叙事。黑死病和新冠疫情有何共同之处?我们如何讲述疫情故事受到政治、文化、社会和历史背景的影响。这是非常具有修辞性的。公众依赖专家(科学家、历史学家和政府官员)提供可信的信息,但疫情期间的不确定性使得快速提供明确答案变得困难。专家需要意识到自己的言论会在哪些背景下被接受。关于黑死病,医学历史学家严重依赖一份单一的中世纪疫情报告,该报告证实了他们对蒙古暴力的先入之见,使他们能够将黑死病描述为生物战的一个例子。然而,查看其他中世纪的记载就会清楚,这种关于蒙古生物战的叙述是错误的。同样,现代疫情叙事也往往使用军事化语言,将疾病可能起源的人群和文化视为他者。鉴于中美之间当前的政治紧张局势,有关 SARS-CoV-2 病毒起源及其传播的叙述导致了错误信息的跨国泛滥,以及对亚裔人群的歧视和暴力。鉴于这种长期存在的模式,我们主张在构建疫情叙事时,更多地进行跨学科合作,让那些被用于构建疫情叙事的专家采用更具批判性的修辞方法与公众进行沟通。