College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Oct;34(5):717-724. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13964. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
To inform local, state and national strategies intended to reduce demand for ED care, the present study aimed to identify key factors influencing the current provision of acute care within primary healthcare (PHC) and explore the policy and system changes potentially required.
Semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed through content and thematic approaches incorporating the Walt and Gilson health policy framework.
Eleven interviews were conducted. Five key considerations were highlighted, namely the barriers and enablers for general practitioners (GPs) in providing acute care, barriers to patient use of PHC instead of ED, suggestions for new PHC models and improvements for current ED models. Additionally, economic issues relating to clinic funding and GP remuneration, complexities of state or federal funding and management of urgent care centres (UCC) were identified. Potential policy changes included GP clinics incorporating emergency appointments, GP triage, further patient streaming and changes to the ED medical workforce model, as well as linking hospitals with PHC clinics. Suggested system changes included improving rapid access to non-GP specialists, offering qualifications for urgent care within PHC, developing integrated information technology systems and educating patients regarding appropriate healthcare system pathways.
The present study suggested that while PHC has the potential to attenuate the demands for ED services, a whole-of-system approach focusing on realignment of priorities and integrated changes are needed.
为了为旨在减少对急诊护理需求的地方、州和国家战略提供信息,本研究旨在确定影响当前初级保健(PHC)中急性护理提供的关键因素,并探讨潜在需要的政策和系统变革。
对主要利益相关者进行半结构式访谈,录音、逐字转录,并通过纳入 Walt 和 Gilson 卫生政策框架的内容和主题方法进行分析。
进行了 11 次访谈。突出强调了五个关键考虑因素,即全科医生(GP)提供急性护理的障碍和促进因素、患者使用 PHC 而不是 ED 的障碍、对新 PHC 模式的建议以及对当前 ED 模式的改进。此外,还确定了与诊所资金和 GP 薪酬有关的经济问题、州或联邦资金的复杂性以及紧急护理中心(UCC)的管理。潜在的政策变革包括将紧急预约、GP 分诊、进一步对患者进行分类以及改变 ED 医疗人员模式纳入 GP 诊所,以及将医院与 PHC 诊所联系起来。建议的系统变革包括改善非 GP 专家的快速获取途径、在 PHC 中提供紧急护理资格、开发集成信息技术系统以及教育患者了解适当的医疗保健系统途径。
本研究表明,虽然 PHC 有可能减轻对 ED 服务的需求,但需要采取全系统方法,重点是调整优先事项和进行综合变革。