• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种醌外抑制剂杀菌剂,唑菌胺酯和吡唑醚菌酯对. 的基础灵敏度和控制效果。

Baseline Sensitivity and Control Efficacy of Two Quinone Outside Inhibitor Fungicides, Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin, Against .

机构信息

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology & Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2022 Nov;106(11):2967-2973. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2850-RE. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2850-RE
PMID:35306849
Abstract

Rice false smut caused by the filamentous fungus is a devastating grain disease in rice. Fungicides have been an important measure for the control of this disease. In this study, baseline sensitivities of 179 isolates of to the quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin were established. The distribution of the 50% effective concentration (EC) values of each fungicide was unimodal. The frequency distribution of logarithmically transformed EC values fit or fit closer to a normal distribution. The ranges of EC values for azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin were 0.001 to 0.864 and 0.001 to 0.569 μg/ml, with means and standard errors of the mean values of 0.203 ± 0.012 and 0.079 ± 0.006 μg/ml, respectively. There was a statistically significant and moderately positive correlation ( = 100, r = 0.469, = 0.001) in sensitivity between these two fungicides. No cross-resistance was found between azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, and carbendazim or sterol demethylation inhibitor fungicides. Each fungicide had a significantly higher mean preventive efficacy compared with its curative efficacy. Field assays showed that the control efficacy of pyraclostrobin against rice false smut was greater than that of azoxystrobin. Pyraclostrobin had the best control of rice false smut in three rice varieties, with the control efficacy ranging from 81.5 to 95.5%, whereas azoxystrobin decreased the disease index by 64.1 to 69.2% under the same conditions. These results provide us a reference point in the management of and future QoI fungicide resistance monitoring programs.

摘要

稻曲病菌引起的稻曲病是水稻上的一种毁灭性病害。杀菌剂一直是防治该病的重要措施。本研究测定了 179 个稻曲病菌菌株对苯醚甲环唑和吡唑醚菌酯两种 QoI 类杀菌剂的基础敏感性。两种药剂的有效中浓度(EC50)值分布均呈单峰型,经对数转换后的 EC50 值频率分布更接近正态分布。苯醚甲环唑和吡唑醚菌酯的 EC50 值范围分别为 0.0010.864 和 0.0010.569μg/ml,平均值分别为 0.203±0.012μg/ml 和 0.079±0.006μg/ml。两种药剂之间的敏感性呈显著的中度正相关(n=100,r=0.469,P=0.001)。苯醚甲环唑、吡唑醚菌酯与多菌灵及甾醇脱甲基抑制剂类杀菌剂之间无交互抗性。与治疗效果相比,每种杀菌剂的预防效果均显著提高。田间试验表明,吡唑醚菌酯对稻曲病的防治效果优于苯醚甲环唑。吡唑醚菌酯在三种水稻品种上对稻曲病的防治效果最好,防治效果为 81.5%95.5%,而苯醚甲环唑在相同条件下使病情指数降低了 64.1%69.2%。这些结果为我们在 管理和未来 QoI 类杀菌剂抗性监测计划方面提供了参考依据。

相似文献

1
Baseline Sensitivity and Control Efficacy of Two Quinone Outside Inhibitor Fungicides, Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin, Against .两种醌外抑制剂杀菌剂,唑菌胺酯和吡唑醚菌酯对. 的基础灵敏度和控制效果。
Plant Dis. 2022 Nov;106(11):2967-2973. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2850-RE. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
2
The Toxicity of Salicylhydroxamic Acid and Its Effect on the Sensitivity of to Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin.水杨羟肟酸的毒性及其对[某种物质]对嘧菌酯和吡唑醚菌酯敏感性的影响。 需注意,原文中“to Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin”前的“the Sensitivity of ”后缺少具体物质,翻译时保留了原文的不完整性。
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;8(11):1231. doi: 10.3390/jof8111231.
3
Sensitivity Baselines, Resistance Monitoring, and Molecular Mechanisms of the Rice False Smut Pathogen to Prochloraz and Azoxystrobin in Four Regions of Southern China.中国南方四个地区水稻稻曲病菌对咪鲜胺和嘧菌酯的敏感性基线、抗性监测及分子机制
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Aug 8;9(8):832. doi: 10.3390/jof9080832.
4
Reduced Sensitivity in Monilinia fructicola Field Isolates from South Carolina and Georgia to Respiration Inhibitor Fungicides.南卡罗来纳州和佐治亚州的褐腐病菌田间分离株对呼吸抑制剂类杀菌剂的敏感性降低
Plant Dis. 2010 Jun;94(6):737-743. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-6-0737.
5
Sensitivity of Anastomosis Group 2-2 Isolates from Soybean and Sugar Beet to Selected SDHI and QoI Fungicides.大豆和糖甜菜中 Anastomosis Group 2-2 分离物对选定 SDHI 和 QoI 杀菌剂的敏感性。
Plant Dis. 2021 Nov;105(11):3573-3579. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-20-2680-RE. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
6
Determining the Distribution of QoI Fungicide-Resistant on Soybean from Indiana.确定印第安纳州大豆上QoI类杀菌剂抗性的分布情况。
Plant Dis. 2023 Apr;107(4):1012-1021. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-22-1744-SR. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
7
Baseline Sensitivity of Guignardia citricarpa Isolates from Florida to Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin.来自佛罗里达州的柑橘球座菌分离株对嘧菌酯和唑菌酯的基线敏感性。
Plant Dis. 2014 Jun;98(6):780-789. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-13-0335-RE.
8
Baseline Sensitivity of Ascochyta rabiei to Azoxystrobin, Pyraclostrobin, and Boscalid.鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌对嘧菌酯、吡唑醚菌酯和啶酰菌胺的基线敏感性
Plant Dis. 2008 Feb;92(2):295-300. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-2-0295.
9
Evaluation of fungicides to manage rice false smut () in the hills of Nepal.尼泊尔山区防治稻曲病的杀菌剂评估
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 8;10(14):e34151. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34151. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
10
Baseline Sensitivity and Control Efficacy of Pyraclostrobin Against Isolates in China.吡唑醚菌酯对中国分离物的基线敏感性和防控效果。
Plant Dis. 2019 Jul;103(7):1458-1463. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-18-1214-RE. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensitivity Baselines, Resistance Monitoring, and Molecular Mechanisms of the Rice False Smut Pathogen to Prochloraz and Azoxystrobin in Four Regions of Southern China.中国南方四个地区水稻稻曲病菌对咪鲜胺和嘧菌酯的敏感性基线、抗性监测及分子机制
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Aug 8;9(8):832. doi: 10.3390/jof9080832.
2
Prevalence of Carbendazin Resistance in Field Populations of the Rice False Smut Pathogen from Jiangsu, China, Molecular Mechanisms, and Fitness Stability.中国江苏水稻稻曲病菌田间种群中多菌灵抗性的发生率、分子机制及适合度稳定性
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;8(12):1311. doi: 10.3390/jof8121311.
3
The Toxicity of Salicylhydroxamic Acid and Its Effect on the Sensitivity of to Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin.
水杨羟肟酸的毒性及其对[某种物质]对嘧菌酯和吡唑醚菌酯敏感性的影响。 需注意,原文中“to Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin”前的“the Sensitivity of ”后缺少具体物质,翻译时保留了原文的不完整性。
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;8(11):1231. doi: 10.3390/jof8111231.