Suppr超能文献

[下腔静脉变异度联合中心静脉 - 动脉血二氧化碳分压差值对感染性休克患者液体复苏指导作用的疗效分析]

[Efficacy analysis of inferior vena cava variability combined with difference of central venous-to-arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide on guiding fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock].

作者信息

He Zhaohui, Yang Xiaogang, Yang Chunli, Wang Rongsheng, He Huiwei

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, China. Corresponding author: Yang Chunli, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jan;34(1):18-22. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210621-00918.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of inferior vena cava variability (IVCV) combined with difference of central venous-to-arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pcv-aCO) on guiding fluid resuscitation in septic shock.

METHODS

Patients with septic shock admitted to the department of critical care medicine of Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 were enrolled, and they were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method. Patients in both groups were given fluid resuscitation according to septic shock fluid resuscitation guidelines. The patients in the control group received fluid resuscitation strictly according to the early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) strategy. Resuscitation target: central venous pressure (CVP) 12-15 cmHO (1 cmHO≈0.098 kPa), mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 65 mmHg (1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa), mean urine volume (UO) > 0.5 mL×kg×h, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO) > 0.70. In the observation group, the endpoint of resuscitation was evaluated by IVCV dynamically monitored by bedside ultrasound and Pcv-aCO. Resuscitation target: fixed filling of inferior vena cava with diameter > 2 cm, IVCV < 18%, and Pcv-aCO < 6 mmHg. The changes in recovery indexes before and 6 hours and 24 hours of resuscitation of the two groups were recorded, and the 6-hour efficiency of fluid resuscitation, 6-hour lactate clearance rate (LCR) and 6-hour and 24-hour total volume of resuscitation were also recorded; at the same time, the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, 28-day mortality and the incidence of acute renal failure and acute pulmonary edema between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were enrolled in the analysis, with 40 in the control group and 40 in the observation group. The MAP, CVP and ScvO at 6 hours and 24 hours of resuscitation in the two groups were significantly higher than those before resuscitation, while Pcv-aCO and blood lactic acid (Lac) were significantly decreased, and UO was increased gradually with the extension of resuscitation time, indicating that both resuscitation endpoint evaluation schemes could alleviate the shock state of patients. Compared with before resuscitation, IVCV at 6 hours and 24 hours of resuscitation in the observation group were decreased significantly [(17.54±4.52)%, (18.32±3.64)% vs. (27.49±10.56)%, both P < 0.05]. Compared with the control group, MAP and ScvO at 6 hours of resuscitation in the observation group were significantly increased [MAP (mmHg): 69.09±4.64 vs. 66.37±4.32, ScvO: 0.666±0.033 vs. 0.645±0.035, both P < 0.05], 24-hour MAP was increased significantly (mmHg: 75.16±3.28 vs. 70.12±2.18, P < 0.05), but CVP was relatively lowered (cmHO: 9.25±1.49 vs. 10.25±1.05, P < 0.05), indicating that the fluid resuscitation efficiency was higher in the observation group. Compared with the control group, 6-hour LCR in the observation group was significantly increased [(55.64±6.23)% vs. (52.45±4.52)%, P < 0.05], 6-hour and 24-hour total volume of resuscitation was significantly decreased (mL: 2 860.73±658.32 vs. 3 568.54±856.43, 4 768.65±1 085.65 vs. 5 385.34±1 354.83, both P < 0.05), the duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shortened (days: 6.78±3.45 vs. 8.45±2.85, P < 0.05), while the incidence of acute pulmonary edema was significantly decreased [2.5% (1/40) vs. 20.0% (8/40), P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the length of ICU stay, 28-day mortality or incidence of acute renal failure between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic monitoring of IVCV and Pcv-aCO can effectively guide the early fluid resuscitation of patients with septic shock, and compared with EGDT, it can significantly shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation, reduce the amount of fluid resuscitation, and reduce the incidence of acute pulmonary edema. Combined with its non-invasive characteristics, it has certain clinical advantages.

摘要

目的

探讨下腔静脉变异度(IVCV)联合中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差值(Pcv-aCO)对脓毒性休克液体复苏的指导作用。

方法

选取2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日在江西省人民医院重症医学科住院的脓毒性休克患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组。两组患者均按照脓毒性休克液体复苏指南进行液体复苏。对照组患者严格按照早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)策略进行液体复苏。复苏目标:中心静脉压(CVP)12~15 cmH₂O(1 cmH₂O≈0.098 kPa),平均动脉压(MAP)>65 mmHg(1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa),平均尿量(UO)>0.5 mL·kg⁻¹·h,中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO₂)>0.70。观察组则通过床旁超声动态监测IVCV及Pcv-aCO评估复苏终点。复苏目标:下腔静脉内径>2 cm且固定充盈,IVCV<18%,Pcv-aCO<6 mmHg。记录两组患者复苏前及复苏6小时、24小时时恢复指标的变化情况,同时记录液体复苏6小时效率、6小时乳酸清除率(LCR)以及6小时和24小时复苏总液体量;比较两组患者机械通气时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、28天死亡率以及急性肾衰竭和急性肺水肿的发生率。

结果

共纳入80例患者进行分析,其中对照组40例,观察组40例。两组患者复苏6小时及24小时时的MAP、CVP及ScvO₂均显著高于复苏前,而Pcv-aCO及血乳酸(Lac)显著降低,且UO随复苏时间延长逐渐增加,提示两种复苏终点评估方案均能缓解患者休克状态。与复苏前比较,观察组复苏6小时及24小时时的IVCV显著降低[(17.54±4.52)%,(18.32±3.64)%比(27.49±10.56)%,P均<0.05]。与对照组比较,观察组复苏6小时时的MAP及ScvO₂显著升高[MAP(mmHg):69.09±4.64比66.37±4.32,ScvO₂:0.666±0.033比0.645±0.035,P均<0.05],24小时MAP显著升高(mmHg:75.16±3.28比70.12±2.18,P<0.05),但CVP相对降低(cmH₂O:9.25±1.49比10.25±1.05,P<0.05),提示观察组液体复苏效率更高。与对照组比较,观察组6小时LCR显著升高[(55.64±6.23)%比(52.45±4.52)%,P<0.05],6小时及24小时复苏总液体量显著减少(mL:2 860.73±658.32比3 568.54±856.43,4 768.65±1 085.65比5 385.34±1 354.83,P均<0.05),机械通气时间显著缩短(天:6.78±3.45比8.45±

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验