Gu Ya'nan, Zhang Wenwu, Wei Jian, Dou Qingli
Department of Emergency Medicine, People's Hospital of Shenzhen Bao'an District, Shenzhen 518100, Guangdong, China. Corresponding author: Dou Qingli, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jan;34(1):48-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210903-01316.
To explore the automated external defibrillator (AED) configuration optimization strategy in line with the characteristics of the rapidly developing cities by analyzing the actual coverage of AED in Bao'an District based on the real world data of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Bao'an District, Shenzhen City.
The data of cardiac arrest database registered in Bao'an District of Shenzhen City from March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 were included in a retrospective observational study. The AED coverage of public and non-public areas was analyzed by calculating the minimum distance between the occurrence place of each OHCA event and the nearest AED. The minimum distance ≤ 100 m was set as AED coverage, and the minimum distance > 100 m was set as non-AED coverage. It was assumed that one AED was configured for each OHCA hotspot area, then the AED coverage changes were analyzed. Based on the actual situation that the AED in schools, governments, sports venues, subways, tourist attractions and parks of public areas in Bao'an District could not be obtained at any time within 24 hours, it was assumed that all AED in the public areas could be obtained at any time within 24 hours, the impact of AED available at any time on AED coverage was analyzed.
A total of 525 cases of OHCA were enrolled. The highest incidence of OHCA was found in residential and industrial areas [54.5% (286/525) and 14.3% (75/525), respectively]. There were 252 AED in Bao'an District, Shenzhen, and 115 OHCA events occurred within the coverage area of AED. Even if all AED met the ideal state that could be obtained at any time within 24 hours, the coverage rate was only 21.9% (115/525). The AED coverage rate of the public areas and non-public areas was 31.6% (37/117) and 19.1% (78/408) respectively, with uneven distribution, and the AED coverage rate of non-public areas was low. Assuming that the residential community and industrial zone with more than 2 OHCA cases were respectively equipped with one AED, the coverage rate of AED in the non-public areas increased from 19.1% (78/408) to 28.2% (115/408), basically meeting the requirement that AED could be obtained at any time when OHCA events occurred. Some AED in the public areas of Bao'an District were not available at any time within 24 hours. If the ideal state that all AED in the public area could be obtained at any time within 24 hours could be achieved, the AED coverage rate of all regions increased from 16.8% (88/525) to 21.9% (115/525), the AED coverage rate of the public areas increased from 29.1% (34/117) to 31.6% (37/117), the AED coverage rate of the non-public areas increased from 13.2% (54/408) to 19.1% (78/408).
AED configuration in Bao'an District was unevenly distributed, and the coverage rate of AED in non-public areas was low. The allocation strategy for AED in fast-growing cities like Shenzhen should be as follows: on the premise of ensuring AED availability for 24 hours, priority should be given to covering the number of AED in the non-public areas including residential communities and industrial zones; AED is available in the public areas for 24 hours.
通过基于深圳市宝安区院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的真实世界数据,分析宝安区自动体外除颤器(AED)的实际覆盖情况,探索符合快速发展城市特点的AED配置优化策略。
纳入2019年3月1日至2020年2月29日深圳市宝安区心脏骤停数据库的数据进行回顾性观察研究。通过计算每个OHCA事件发生地点与最近AED之间的最短距离,分析公共区域和非公共区域的AED覆盖情况。将最短距离≤100 m设定为AED覆盖范围,最短距离>100 m设定为非AED覆盖范围。假设为每个OHCA热点区域配置一台AED,然后分析AED覆盖情况的变化。基于宝安区公共区域学校、政府、体育场馆、地铁、旅游景点和公园内的AED在24小时内无法随时获取的实际情况,假设公共区域所有AED在24小时内均可随时获取,分析随时可用的AED对AED覆盖情况的影响。
共纳入525例OHCA病例。OHCA发病率最高的区域为居民区和工业区[分别为54.5%(286/525)和14.3%(75/525)]。深圳市宝安区有252台AED,115例OHCA事件发生在AED覆盖范围内。即使所有AED均达到在24小时内可随时获取的理想状态,覆盖率也仅为21.9%(115/525)。公共区域和非公共区域的AED覆盖率分别为31.6%(37/117)和19.1%(78/408),分布不均,非公共区域AED覆盖率较低。假设OHCA病例数超过2例的居民区和工业区分别配备一台AED,非公共区域AED覆盖率从19.1%(78/408)提高到28.2%(115/408),基本满足OHCA事件发生时可随时获取AED的要求。宝安区公共区域部分AED在24小时内无法随时获取。若能实现公共区域所有AED在24小时内均可随时获取的理想状态,所有区域的AED覆盖率从16.8%(88/525)提高到21.9%(115/525),公共区域AED覆盖率从29.1%(34/117)提高到31.6%(37/117),非公共区域AED覆盖率从13.2%(54/408)提高到19.1%(78/408)。
宝安区AED配置分布不均,非公共区域AED覆盖率较低。对于像深圳这样快速发展的城市,AED的配置策略应为:在确保AED 24小时可用的前提下,优先覆盖包括居民区和工业区在内的非公共区域的AED数量;公共区域AED 24小时可用。