Laboratory of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Laboratory of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 10;829:154650. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154650. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
Green roofs offer several environmental and social benefits to urban life. However, such roofs require a greater amount of materials than conventional roofs. The life cycle assessment (LCA) is an appropriate tool that has been used to obtain the potential environmental impacts associated with green roofs throughout their life cycle. This paper aims to review the literature related to the LCA of green roofs, responding: which materials and layers were used in green roofs in LCA studies; which processes were considered in each life cycle phase; which types of roofs have already been compared to green roofs through LCA; which measures are taken to reduce the environmental impacts of green roofs; which methods were used to assess the economic feasibility of green roofs over their life cycle and what were the purposes of such analyses; and which LCA studies included public perceptions about the green roofs. Our findings indicate that the materials used in the green roof layers vary among the articles. However, polymeric materials are usually used for all the layers, except for the substrate. Cradle to grave is the most common approach. Within this approach, more than half of the articles considered cooling and heating energy, which may significantly influence the life cycle analysis results. Most studies reviewed agreed that green roofs cause less environmental impacts than conventional and white roofs. The use of byproducts or recycled materials may further improve the performance. In most studies, public perception is not included in the analysis. Regarding the economic approach, both life cycle cost and life cycle cost-benefit are used to compare green roofs economic viability with other roof systems. In addition to discussing studies reported in the literature, this article also recommends future research to improve the performance of green roofs.
绿色屋顶为城市生活带来了许多环境和社会效益。然而,与传统屋顶相比,绿色屋顶需要更多的材料。生命周期评估(LCA)是一种合适的工具,已被用于获得与绿色屋顶整个生命周期相关的潜在环境影响。本文旨在综述与绿色屋顶 LCA 相关的文献,以回答以下问题:LCA 研究中绿色屋顶使用了哪些材料和层;在每个生命周期阶段考虑了哪些过程;已经通过 LCA 对哪些类型的屋顶进行了比较;采取了哪些措施来减少绿色屋顶的环境影响;使用了哪些方法来评估绿色屋顶在其生命周期内的经济可行性以及这些分析的目的是什么;以及哪些 LCA 研究包括公众对绿色屋顶的看法。我们的研究结果表明,绿色屋顶层中使用的材料在不同文章中有所不同。然而,除了基质层外,所有层通常都使用聚合材料。摇篮到坟墓是最常见的方法。在这种方法中,超过一半的文章考虑了冷却和加热能源,这可能会显著影响生命周期分析结果。大多数综述研究都认为绿色屋顶比传统屋顶和白色屋顶造成的环境影响更小。使用副产品或回收材料可能会进一步提高性能。在大多数研究中,公众意见并未包含在分析中。关于经济方法,生命周期成本和生命周期成本效益都被用于比较绿色屋顶与其他屋顶系统的经济可行性。除了讨论文献中报道的研究外,本文还建议未来的研究以提高绿色屋顶的性能。