• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膝关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防:是否能降低感染风险?

Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Revision TKA: Does It Decrease Infection Risk?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Health Sciences Research, Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S997-S1003.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.042. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.042
PMID:35307528
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOA) has been shown to potentially reduce infection rates after high-risk primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and reimplantations. However, data is limited regarding EOA after aseptic revision TKAs. This study evaluated the impact of EOA on infection-related outcomes after aseptic revision TKAs.

METHODS

904 aseptic revision TKAs from 2014-2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received EOA >24 hours perioperatively (n = 267) were compared to those who did not (n = 637) using an inverse probability of treatment weighting model. Mean age was 66 years, mean BMI was 33 kg/m, and 54% were female. Outcomes included cumulative probabilities of any infection, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), superficial infection, and re-revision or reoperation for infection.

RESULTS

The cumulative probability of any infection after aseptic revision TKA was 1.9% at 90 days, 3.5% at 1 year, and 8.1% at 5 years. Patients without EOA had a higher risk of any infection at 90 days (HR = 7.1; P = .01), but not other time points. The cumulative probability of PJI after aseptic revision TKA was 0.8% at 90 days, 2.3% at 1 year, and 6.5% at 5 years. Patients without EOA did not have an increased risk of PJI. There were no differences in re-revision or reoperation for infection at any time point between groups.

CONCLUSION

Extended oral antibiotics after aseptic revision TKA were associated with a 7-fold decreased risk of any infection at 90 days. The results suggest a potential role for EOA after aseptic revision TKA and warrant additional prospective studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景

延长口服抗生素预防(EOA)已被证明可降低高危初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)和再植入术后的感染率。然而,关于无菌性翻修 TKA 后 EOA 的数据有限。本研究评估了 EOA 对无菌性翻修 TKA 后与感染相关结局的影响。

方法

回顾性确定了 2014 年至 2019 年的 904 例无菌性翻修 TKA。比较了接受围手术期 24 小时以上 EOA(n=267)的患者与未接受 EOA(n=637)的患者。使用逆概率治疗加权模型进行比较。平均年龄为 66 岁,平均 BMI 为 33kg/m2,54%为女性。结果包括任何感染、假体周围关节感染(PJI)、浅表感染和因感染而再次翻修或再次手术的累积概率。

结果

无菌性翻修 TKA 后 90 天任何感染的累积概率为 1.9%,1 年为 3.5%,5 年为 8.1%。未接受 EOA 的患者在 90 天时有更高的任何感染风险(HR=7.1;P=0.01),但在其他时间点则不然。无菌性翻修 TKA 后 PJI 的累积概率为 90 天 0.8%,1 年 2.3%,5 年 6.5%。未接受 EOA 的患者 PJI 风险并未增加。两组在任何时间点的因感染而再次翻修或再次手术均无差异。

结论

无菌性翻修 TKA 后延长口服抗生素与 90 天任何感染风险降低 7 倍相关。结果提示 EOA 在无菌性翻修 TKA 后可能有作用,需要进一步的前瞻性研究。

证据水平

III 级。

相似文献

1
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Revision TKA: Does It Decrease Infection Risk?膝关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防:是否能降低感染风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S997-S1003.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.042. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does It Decrease Infection Risk?无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防性用药:能否降低感染风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;37(12):2460-2465. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.023. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Revisions: A Preliminary Report.无菌性全髋关节或膝关节置换翻修术后延长口服抗生素预防:初步报告
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan;38(1):141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
4
Should All Patients Receive Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis? Defining Its Role in Patients Undergoing Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.所有患者均应接受延长口服抗生素预防治疗吗?在初次全关节置换和无菌性翻修手术患者中定义其作用。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S117-S121.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
5
Reduced Infection Rate After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Extended Oral Antibiotic Protocol.采用延长口服抗生素方案的无菌翻修全膝关节置换术后感染率降低
J Arthroplasty. 2022 May;37(5):905-909. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.040. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
6
Extended Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics with First-Generation Cephalosporin Do Not Reduce the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.第一代头孢菌素延长术后预防性使用抗生素并不能降低无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Knee Surg. 2020 Jun;33(6):597-602. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683889. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.人工关节周围感染是现代膝关节置换术失败的主要原因:对11134例膝关节的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.延长预防性抗生素用于初次和无菌性翻修全关节置换术:一项荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S476-S487. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.014. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
Not so Fast: Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Does Not Reduce 90-Day Infection Rate Following Joint Arthroplasty.不要太快:关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防并不能降低 90 天内的感染率。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S122-S128. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.064. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
10
Aseptic Reoperations Within 1 Year of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Markedly Increase the Risk of Later Periprosthetic Joint Infection.初次全膝关节置换术后 1 年内进行无菌再手术显著增加了后期发生假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3668-3672. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.054. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Free Survivorship After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防与假体周围关节无感染生存率
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 13;33:101694. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101694. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Extended oral antibiotics in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty: An update.初次及翻修全关节置换术中延长口服抗生素治疗:最新进展
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 8;66:103011. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103011. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Cement loaded with high-dose gentamicin and clindamycin does not reduce the risk of subsequent infection after aseptic total hip or knee revision arthroplasty: a preliminary study.
载有高剂量庆大霉素和克林霉素的骨水泥不能降低无菌性全髋关节或膝关节翻修术后后续感染的风险:一项初步研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Jul 24;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00775-1.
4
Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.在严重骨缺损的翻修膝关节置换术中,钽金属杯的中期至长期效果良好。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5496-5506. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07593-8. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Post-operative prophylactic antibiotics in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matching analysis.关节置换翻修术中无菌性术后预防性抗生素应用:倾向评分匹配分析
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23129-5.