Koh Chuan Kong, Zeng Irene, Ravi Saiprassad, Zhu Mark, Vince Kelly G, Young Simon W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Shore Hospital, 124 Shakespeare Road, Westlake, 0622, New Zealand.
Counties Manukau Health Board, Otahuhu, New Zealand.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Although large series from national joint registries may accurately reflect indications for revision TKAs, they may lack the granularity to detect the true incidence and relative importance of such indications, especially periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using a combination of individual chart review supplemented with New Zealand Joint Registry data, we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of revision TKA? (2) What are the common indications for revising a contemporary primary TKA? (3) Do revision TKA indications differ at various followup times after primary TKA?
We identified 11,134 primary TKAs performed between 2000 and 2015 in three tertiary referral hospitals. The New Zealand Joint Registry and individual patient chart review were used to identify 357 patients undergoing subsequent revision surgery or any reoperation for PJI. All clinical records, radiographs, and laboratory results were reviewed to identify the primary revision reason. The cumulative incidence of each revision reason was calculated using a competing risk estimator.
The cumulative incidence for revision TKA at 15 years followup was 6.1% (95% CI, 5.1%-7.1%). The two most-common revision reasons at 15 years followup were PJI followed by aseptic loosening. The risk of revision or reoperation for PJI was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.7%-2.3%) and aseptic loosening was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.6%). Approximately half of the revision TKAs secondary to PJI occurred within 2 years of the index TKA (95% CI, 0.8%-1.2%), whereas half of the revision TKAs secondary to aseptic loosening occurred 8 years after the index TKA (95% CI, 0.4%-0.7%).
In this large cohort of patients with comprehensive followup of revision procedures, PJI was the dominant reason for failure during the first 15 years after primary TKA. Aseptic loosening became more important with longer followup. Efforts to improve outcome after primary TKA should focus on these areas, particularly prevention of PJI.
Level III, therapeutic study.
尽管来自国家关节登记处的大量数据系列可能准确反映翻修全膝关节置换术(TKA)的指征,但它们可能缺乏足够的细致程度来检测这些指征的真实发生率和相对重要性,尤其是假体周围关节感染(PJI)。
问题/目的:结合个体病历回顾并补充新西兰关节登记处的数据,我们提出以下问题:(1)翻修TKA的累积发生率是多少?(2)当代初次TKA翻修的常见指征有哪些?(3)初次TKA后不同随访时间的翻修TKA指征是否不同?
我们确定了2000年至2015年间在三家三级转诊医院进行的11,134例初次TKA。利用新西兰关节登记处的数据和个体患者病历回顾,确定了357例接受后续翻修手术或因PJI进行任何再次手术的患者。对所有临床记录、X线片和实验室结果进行回顾,以确定初次翻修的原因。使用竞争风险估计器计算每个翻修原因的累积发生率。
随访15年时翻修TKA的累积发生率为6.1%(95%CI,5.1%-7.1%)。随访15年时两个最常见的翻修原因是PJI,其次是无菌性松动。PJI的翻修或再次手术风险为2.0%(95%CI,1.7%-2.3%),无菌性松动为1.2%(95%CI,0.7%-1.6%)。继发于PJI的翻修TKA中约一半发生在初次TKA后的2年内(95%CI,0.8%-1.2%),而继发于无菌性松动的翻修TKA中约一半发生在初次TKA后的8年(95%CI,0.4%-0.7%)。
在这个对翻修手术进行全面随访的大型患者队列中,PJI是初次TKA后前15年失败的主要原因。随着随访时间延长,无菌性松动变得更加重要。改善初次TKA术后结果的努力应集中在这些方面,尤其是预防PJI。
III级,治疗性研究。