Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences.
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Library, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Jun 20;54:jrm00289. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.547.
To systematically evaluate the measurement properties of aerobic capacity measures in neuromuscular diseases.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, SportDiscus and Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science were systematically searched from inception until 30 June 2021.
Screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and quality assessment were performed by 2 independent researchers. Studies were included if they evaluated measurement properties of aerobic capacity measures in adults with neuromuscular diseases. Risk of bias was assessed using the COnsensus based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results were pooled and the quality of the evidence was determined using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
Nine studies including 187 participants were included in this review. Low quality of evidence was found for sufficient content validity of peak oxygen consumption through maximal exercise testing. Criterion validity of 4 out of 7 different measures to predict peak oxygen consumption was sufficient; however, quality of evidence was low or very low for all measures. No studies were found evaluating reliability or responsiveness.
There was a lack of high-quality studies with sufficiently large sample sizes that evaluated the measurement properties of aerobic capacity measures in neuromuscular diseases.
系统评价神经肌肉疾病中有氧运动能力测量指标的测量性能。
从建库到 2021 年 6 月 30 日，系统地检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、SportDiscus 和 Web of Science 会议论文集引文索引-科学。
由 2 名独立研究人员进行筛选、数据提取、偏倚风险评估和质量评估。如果研究评估了神经肌肉疾病成人有氧运动能力测量指标的测量性能，则将其纳入研究。使用基于共识的健康状况测量仪器选择标准（COSMIN）清单评估偏倚风险。汇总结果并使用改良的推荐评估、制定和评估（GRADE）方法确定证据质量。
本综述共纳入 9 项研究，包括 187 名参与者。通过最大运动测试评估最大摄氧量的充分内容效度的证据质量为低。7 种不同指标中有 4 种指标预测最大摄氧量的标准效度是充分的；然而，所有指标的证据质量均为低或极低。没有研究评估可靠性或反应性。
缺乏高质量、足够大样本量的研究，这些研究评估了神经肌肉疾病中有氧运动能力测量指标的测量性能。
