• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政策实施前后军事卫生系统中纳洛酮的处方实践。

Naloxone prescribing practices in the Military Health System before and after policy implementation.

作者信息

Pakieser Jennifer, Peters Sidney, Tilley Laura C, Costantino Ryan C, Scott-Richardson Maya, Highland Krista B

机构信息

School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Pain Rep. 2021 Mar 14;7(2):e993. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000993. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000993
PMID:35311027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8923585/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite public health campaigns, policies, and educational programs, naloxone prescription rates among people receiving opioids remains low. In June 2018, the U.S. Military Health System (MHS) released 2 policies to improve naloxone prescribing.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to examine whether the policies resulted in increased naloxone coprescription rates for patients who met the criteria for 1 or more risk indicators (eg, long-term opioid therapy, benzodiazepine coprescription, morphine equivalent daily dose ≥50 mg, and elevated overdose risk score) at the time of opioid dispense.

METHODS

Prescription and risk indicator data from January 2017 to February 2021 were extracted from the MHS Data Repository. Naloxone coprescription rates from January 2017 to September 2018 were used to forecast prescribing rates from October 2018 to February 2021 overall and across risk indicators. Forecasted rates were compared with actual rates using Bayesian time series analyses.

RESULTS

The probability of receiving a naloxone coprescription was higher for patients whose opioid prescriber and pharmacy were both within military treatment facilities vs both within the purchased-care network. Bayesian time series results indicated that the number of patients who met the criteria for any risk indicator decreased throughout the study period. Naloxone prescribing rates increased across the study period from <1% to 20% and did not significantly differ from the forecasted rates across any and each risk indicator (adjusted values all >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Future analyses are needed to better understand naloxone prescribing practices and the impact of improvements to electronic health records, decision support tools, and policies.

摘要

引言

尽管开展了公共卫生运动、制定了相关政策并实施了教育项目,但接受阿片类药物治疗的人群中纳洛酮处方率仍然很低。2018年6月,美国军事卫生系统(MHS)发布了两项政策以改善纳洛酮的处方开具情况。

目的

本研究的目的是检验这些政策是否导致在阿片类药物配药时符合一项或多项风险指标标准(例如,长期阿片类药物治疗、同时开具苯二氮䓬类药物、每日吗啡当量≥50毫克以及过量用药风险评分升高)的患者的纳洛酮联合处方率有所提高。

方法

从MHS数据存储库中提取了2017年1月至2021年2月的处方和风险指标数据。使用2017年1月至2018年9月的纳洛酮联合处方率来预测2018年10月至2021年2月总体以及各风险指标的处方率。使用贝叶斯时间序列分析将预测率与实际率进行比较。

结果

阿片类药物开方者和药房均在军事治疗机构内的患者接受纳洛酮联合处方的可能性高于两者均在购买护理网络内的患者。贝叶斯时间序列结果表明,在整个研究期间,符合任何风险指标标准的患者数量有所减少。在整个研究期间,纳洛酮处方率从<1%提高到了20%,并且在任何和每个风险指标方面与预测率均无显著差异(调整后的值均>0.05)。

结论

需要进行进一步分析,以更好地了解纳洛酮处方开具做法以及电子健康记录、决策支持工具和政策改进的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94d/8923585/f3b478249c4d/painreports-7-e993-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94d/8923585/c510553a9d84/painreports-7-e993-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94d/8923585/f3b478249c4d/painreports-7-e993-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94d/8923585/c510553a9d84/painreports-7-e993-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94d/8923585/f3b478249c4d/painreports-7-e993-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Naloxone prescribing practices in the Military Health System before and after policy implementation.政策实施前后军事卫生系统中纳洛酮的处方实践。
Pain Rep. 2021 Mar 14;7(2):e993. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000993. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
2
Development, implementation, and evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to improve naloxone coprescription within Military Health System pharmacies.开发、实施和评估一种临床决策支持工具,以改善军事卫生系统药房内纳洛酮的联合处方情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jan 1;79(1):e58-e64. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab206.
3
Military Health System Opioid, Tramadol, and Gabapentinoid Prescription Volumes Before and After a Defense Health Agency Policy Release.国防卫生局政策发布前后军事卫生系统阿片类药物、曲马多和加巴喷丁类药物的处方量
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 May;42(5):439-446. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01152-8. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
4
Presence of opioid safety initiatives, prescribing patterns for opioid and naloxone, and perceived barriers to prescribing naloxone: Cross-sectional survey results based on practice type, scope, and location.阿片类药物安全措施的存在、阿片类药物和纳洛酮的处方模式,以及开具纳洛酮的感知障碍:基于实践类型、范围和地点的横断面调查结果。
J Opioid Manag. 2021 Jan-Feb;17(1):19-38. doi: 10.5055/jom.2021.0611.
5
Vital Signs: Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Dispensing - United States, 2012-2018.生命体征:2012-2018 年美国基于药房的纳洛酮配药情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 9;68(31):679-686. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6831e1.
6
Legal requirements and recommendations to prescribe naloxone.合法要求和建议开具纳洛酮处方。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Apr 1;209:107896. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107896. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Acceptability of Naloxone Co-Prescription Among Primary Care Providers Treating Patients on Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Pain.在为长期接受阿片类药物治疗疼痛的患者提供治疗的初级保健提供者中纳洛酮联合处方的可接受性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):291-295. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3911-z. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
8
Association Between Naloxone Coprescription Mandates and Postoperative Outcomes.纳洛酮共开处方规定与术后结果的关系。
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):e995-e1002. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005821. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
9
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
10
Nonrandomized Intervention Study of Naloxone Coprescription for Primary Care Patients Receiving Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Pain.纳洛酮联合处方用于接受长期阿片类药物治疗疼痛的初级保健患者的非随机干预研究
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16;165(4):245-52. doi: 10.7326/M15-2771. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Opioid Prescriptions for Low Back Pain among Military-Connected Older Adults Across Multiple Care Systems.多个医疗系统中与军队有关联的老年成年人的腰痛阿片类药物处方
Drugs Aging. 2025 Feb;42(2):143-153. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01176-z. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Development, implementation, and evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to improve naloxone coprescription within Military Health System pharmacies.开发、实施和评估一种临床决策支持工具,以改善军事卫生系统药房内纳洛酮的联合处方情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jan 1;79(1):e58-e64. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab206.
2
Opioid prescribing in the U.S. Military Health System, 2014 to 2018: fewer prescriptions, fewer pills, and shorter treatment duration.2014 年至 2018 年美国军事医疗体系中的阿片类药物处方情况:处方数量减少,药丸数量减少,治疗时间缩短。
Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):e87-e93. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002313.
3
A Healthcare System-Level Intervention to Increase Naloxone Availability for Patients With Opioid Prescriptions.
一种提高开具阿片类药物处方患者纳洛酮可及性的医疗系统层面干预措施。
Am J Addict. 2021 Mar;30(2):179-182. doi: 10.1111/ajad.13136. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
4
Reasons People Who Use Opioids Do Not Accept or Carry No-Cost Naloxone: Qualitative Interview Study.使用阿片类药物者不接受或不携带免费纳洛酮的原因:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Dec 23;4(12):e22411. doi: 10.2196/22411.
5
Comparison of naloxone prescribing patterns due to educational outreach conducted by full-time and part-time academic detailers at the U.S. Veterans Health Administration.美国退伍军人事务部全职和兼职学术代表进行教育推广后纳洛酮处方模式的比较。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Jul-Aug;60(4):639-646. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Racial inequities in U.S. naloxone prescriptions.美国纳洛酮处方中的种族不平等现象。
Subst Abus. 2020;41(2):232-244. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1686721. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Differences in Naloxone Prescribing by Patient Age, Ethnicity, and Clinic Location Among Patients at High-Risk of Opioid Overdose.阿片类药物过量高风险患者中纳洛酮处方在患者年龄、种族和诊所位置方面的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1603-1605. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05405-9. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Naloxone Prescriptions Among Commercially Insured Individuals at High Risk of Opioid Overdose.商业保险覆盖人群中阿片类药物过量高危个体的纳洛酮处方情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193209. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3209.
9
Opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution: Development of the Veterans Health Administration's national program.阿片类药物过量教育与纳洛酮分发:退伍军人健康管理局国家项目的开展
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Mar-Apr;57(2S):S168-S179.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.022.
10
Development and applications of the Veterans Health Administration's Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation (STORM) to improve opioid safety and prevent overdose and suicide.退伍军人健康管理局的阿片类药物风险缓解分层工具(STORM)的开发与应用,以提高阿片类药物安全性并预防过量用药和自杀。
Psychol Serv. 2017 Feb;14(1):34-49. doi: 10.1037/ser0000099.