School of Chemical Engineering-Research Lab of Advanced, Composite, Nano Materials, and Nanotechnology (RNANO Lab), 68994National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Athens, Greece.
ELODIZ Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Appl Spectrosc. 2022 Jul;76(7):747-772. doi: 10.1177/00037028221090988. Epub 2022 May 23.
Over the past decades Raman spectroscopy has been extensively used both on an industrial and academic level. This has resulted in the development of numerous specialized Raman techniques and Raman active products, which in turn has led to the adoption and development of standards and norms pertaining to Raman unit's calibration, performance validation, and interoperability. Purpose of the present review is to list, classify, and engage in a comprehensive analysis of the different standards, guides, and practices relating to Raman spectroscopy. Primary aim of the review is to consider the commonalities and conflicts between these standards and norms and to identify any missing aspects. Standardization in the field of Raman spectroscopy is dominated by the work of American institutions, namely, the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM or ASTM International), with several active standards in place pertaining to terminology, calibration, multivariate analysis, and specific applications, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), providing numerous certified reference materials, referred to as standard reference materials. The industrial application of Raman spectroscopy is dominated by the pharmaceutical industry. As such, pharmacopoeias provide not only important information in relation to pharmaceutical-related applications of Raman spectroscopy, but also invaluable insight, into the basic principles of Raman spectroscopy and important aspects that include calibration, validation, measurement, and chemometric analysis processes, usually by referring to ASTM and NIST standards. Given the fact that Raman spectroscopy is a modern and innovative field, the standardization processes are complex and constantly evolving. Despite the seemingly high number of existing standards, the standardization landscape is incomplete and has not been modernized according to the developments in Raman spectroscopy techniques in recent years. This is evident by the lack of protocols for numerous areas as well as by the fact that some of the existing standards have not been updated to reflect the advances in the technique. Therefore, it is important for the Raman community to actively engage in and contribute to a modernization process that will result in updating existing and introducing new terms, protocols, and guides. Indeed, the development of optimized common standards would be extremely beneficial and would further foster the development and application of Raman spectroscopy techniques, most notably those of surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and low-resolution portable analyzers.
在过去的几十年中,拉曼光谱技术在工业和学术领域都得到了广泛的应用。这导致了许多专门的拉曼技术和拉曼活性产品的发展,进而导致了与拉曼单元校准、性能验证和互操作性相关的标准和规范的采用和发展。本综述的目的是列出、分类和综合分析与拉曼光谱相关的不同标准、指南和实践。本综述的主要目的是考虑这些标准和规范之间的共同点和冲突,并确定任何缺失的方面。拉曼光谱领域的标准化主要由美国机构主导,即美国测试材料协会(ASTM 或 ASTM International),已经制定了几个关于术语、校准、多元分析和特定应用的现行标准,以及国家标准与技术研究所(NIST),提供了许多称为标准参考材料的认证参考材料。拉曼光谱的工业应用主要由制药行业主导。因此,药典不仅提供了与拉曼光谱在制药方面的应用相关的重要信息,而且还提供了关于拉曼光谱基本原理和重要方面的宝贵见解,包括校准、验证、测量和化学计量分析过程,通常是通过参考 ASTM 和 NIST 标准。鉴于拉曼光谱是一个现代和创新的领域,标准化过程是复杂的,并且在不断发展。尽管现有的标准数量似乎很多,但标准化格局并不完整,并且没有根据近年来拉曼光谱技术的发展进行现代化。这表现在许多领域缺乏协议,以及一些现有标准没有更新以反映技术的进步。因此,拉曼社区积极参与并推动现代化进程非常重要,这将导致更新现有标准并引入新的术语、协议和指南。实际上,优化的通用标准的制定将非常有益,并将进一步促进拉曼光谱技术的发展和应用,尤其是表面增强拉曼光谱和低分辨率便携式分析仪技术的发展和应用。