28478Fraunhofer LBF, Darmstadt, Germany.
ELODIZ Ltd, High Wycombe, UK.
Appl Spectrosc. 2022 Sep;76(9):1021-1041. doi: 10.1177/00037028221094070. Epub 2022 May 27.
Raman spectroscopy is used in a wide variety of fields, and in a plethora of different configurations. Raman spectra of simple analytes can often be analyzed using univariate approaches and interpreted in a straightforward manner. For more complex spetral data such as time series or line profiles (1D), Raman maps (2D), or even volumes (3D), multivariate data analysis (MVDA) becomes a requirement. Even though there are some existing standards for creation, implementation, and validation of methods and models employed in industry and academics, further research and development in the field must contribute to their improvement. This review will cover, in broad terms, existing techniques as well as new developments for MVDA for Raman spectroscopic data, and in particular the use associated with instrumentation and data calibration. Chemometric models are often generated via fusion of analytical data from different sources, which enhances model discrimination and prediction abilities as compared to models derived from a single data source. For Raman spectroscopy, raw or unprocessed data is rarely ever used. Instead, spectra are usually corrected and manipulated, often by case-specific rather than universal methods. Calibration models can be used to characterize qualitatively and/or quantitatively samples measured with the same instrumentation that was used to create the model. However, regular validation is required to ensure that aging or incorrect maintenance of the instrument does not alter the model's predictions, particularly when applied in regulated fields such as pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, a model transfer may be required for different reasons, such as replacement or significant repair of the instrumentation. Modeling can also be used to consistently harmonize Raman spectroscopic data across several instrumental designs, accounting for variations in the resulting spectrum induced by different components. Data for Raman harmonization models should be processed in a protocolled manner, and the original data accessible to allow for model reconstruction or transfer when new data is added. Important processing steps will be the calibration of the spectral axes and instrument dependent effects, such as spectral resolution. In addition, data fusion and model transfer are essential for allowing new instrumentation to build on existing models to harmonize their own data. Ideally, an open access database would be created and maintained, for the purpose of allowing for continued harmonization of new Raman instruments using an outlined and accepted protocol.
拉曼光谱在广泛的领域中得到应用,并且有多种不同的配置。简单分析物的拉曼光谱通常可以使用单变量方法进行分析,并以直接的方式进行解释。对于更复杂的光谱数据,如时间序列或线轮廓(1D)、拉曼图谱(2D),甚至体积(3D),需要进行多元数据分析(MVDA)。尽管在工业和学术界中存在一些用于创建、实施和验证方法和模型的现有标准,但该领域的进一步研究和开发必须有助于改进这些标准。本综述将广泛涵盖现有的技术以及用于拉曼光谱数据的 MVDA 的新发展,特别是与仪器和数据校准相关的应用。化学计量模型通常通过融合来自不同来源的分析数据来生成,与从单个数据源得出的模型相比,这可以增强模型的区分和预测能力。对于拉曼光谱,很少使用原始或未处理的数据。相反,通常通过特定于案例的而不是通用的方法来校正和处理光谱。校准模型可用于定性和/或定量地描述使用与创建模型相同的仪器测量的样品。然而,需要定期验证以确保仪器老化或维护不当不会改变模型的预测,尤其是在制药等受监管的领域应用时。此外,由于仪器更换或重大维修等原因,可能需要进行模型转移。建模还可用于在多个仪器设计之间一致地协调拉曼光谱数据,同时考虑到不同组件引起的光谱变化。用于拉曼协调模型的数据应按照协议进行处理,并可以访问原始数据,以便在添加新数据时可以进行模型重建或转移。重要的处理步骤包括光谱轴和仪器相关效应(如光谱分辨率)的校准。此外,数据融合和模型转移对于允许新仪器在现有模型的基础上进行构建以协调其自身数据至关重要。理想情况下,将创建和维护一个开放访问数据库,以便使用规定和接受的协议继续协调新的拉曼仪器。