Sidani Jaime E, Hoffman Beth, Colditz Jason B, Wolynn Riley, Hsiao Lily, Chu Kar-Hai, Rose Jason J, Shensa Ariel, Davis Esa, Primack Brian
Center for Social Dynamics and Community Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 13;6(4):e26335. doi: 10.2196/26335.
Misinformation and conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are increasing. Some of this may stem from early reports suggesting a lower risk of severe COVID-19 in nicotine users. Additionally, a common conspiracy is that the e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) outbreak of 2019 was actually an early presentation of COVID-19. This may have important public health ramifications for both COVID-19 control and ENDS use.
Twitter is an ideal tool for analyzing real-time public discussions related to both ENDS and COVID-19. This study seeks to collect and classify Twitter messages ("tweets") related to ENDS and COVID-19 to inform public health messaging.
Approximately 2.1 million tweets matching ENDS-related keywords were collected from March 1, 2020, through June 30, 2020, and were then filtered for COVID-19-related keywords, resulting in 67,321 original tweets. A 5% (n=3366) subsample was obtained for human coding using a systematically developed codebook. Tweets were coded for relevance to the topic and four overarching categories.
A total of 1930 (57.3%) tweets were coded as relevant to the research topic. Half (n=1008, 52.2%) of these discussed a perceived association between ENDS use and COVID-19 susceptibility or severity, with 42.4% (n=818) suggesting that ENDS use is associated with worse COVID-19 symptoms. One-quarter (n=479, 24.8%) of tweets discussed the perceived similarity/dissimilarity of COVID-19 and EVALI, and 13.8% (n=266) discussed ENDS use behavior. Misinformation and conspiracy theories were present throughout all coding categories.
Discussions about ENDS use and COVID-19 on Twitter frequently highlight concerns about the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 for ENDS users; however, many contain misinformation and conspiracy theories. Public health messaging should capitalize on these concerns and amplify accurate Twitter messaging.
与2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)相关的错误信息和阴谋论正在增加。其中一些可能源于早期报告,这些报告表明尼古丁使用者患严重COVID-19的风险较低。此外,一个常见的阴谋论是,2019年电子烟或雾化产品使用相关肺损伤(EVALI)的爆发实际上是COVID-19的早期表现。这可能对COVID-19防控和ENDS使用都产生重要的公共卫生影响。
推特是分析与ENDS和COVID-19相关的实时公众讨论的理想工具。本研究旨在收集和分类与ENDS和COVID-19相关的推特信息(“推文”),以为公共卫生信息传播提供参考。
从2020年3月1日至2020年6月30日收集了约210万条与ENDS相关关键词匹配的推文,然后筛选出与COVID-19相关的关键词,得到67321条原始推文。使用系统开发的编码手册抽取5%(n = 3366)的子样本进行人工编码。推文根据与主题的相关性和四个总体类别进行编码。
共有1930条(57.3%)推文被编码为与研究主题相关。其中一半(n = 1008,52.2%)讨论了ENDS使用与COVID-19易感性或严重程度之间的感知关联,42.4%(n = 818)表明ENDS使用与更严重的COVID-19症状相关。四分之一(n = 479,24.8%)的推文讨论了COVID-19与EVALI的感知相似性/差异,13.8%(n = 266)讨论了ENDS使用行为。在所有编码类别中都存在错误信息和阴谋论。
推特上关于ENDS使用和COVID-19的讨论经常突出对ENDS使用者感染COVID-19的易感性和严重程度的担忧;然而,许多讨论包含错误信息和阴谋论。公共卫生信息传播应利用这些担忧,并扩大准确的推特信息传播。