Psychoanal Q. 2021;90(3):373-397. doi: 10.1080/00332828.2021.1936090.
Through three detailed clinical vignettes, the author explores the ethical undergirding of . He defines play as a form of idiomatic responsiveness that emerges in the context of analytic intersubjectivity, one that can illuminate elements of fixed transference-countertransference enactment. The author outlines an ethic of play that considers whether the analyst's forms of responsiveness deepen and enliven the patient's understanding of unconscious fantasy, conflict, and internalized object relations. Play poses challenges and a potential risk for the analytic couple, since in play rules are often changing in the dialogue between the conscious and unconscious minds of the analytic couple.
通过三个详细的临床案例，作者探讨了......的伦理基础。他将游戏定义为一种在分析主体间性背景下出现的惯用反应形式，这种形式可以阐明固定的移情-反移情表现的某些元素。作者概述了一种游戏伦理，考虑分析师的反应形式是否加深和丰富了患者对无意识幻想、冲突和内化客体关系的理解。游戏给分析双方带来了挑战和潜在风险，因为在游戏中，规则在分析双方的意识和无意识思维之间的对话中经常发生变化。
