Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Learning, Age & Bilingualism laboratory (LAB-lab), University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Aug;51(4):885-901. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09868-6. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
Phonological duration differences in quantity languages can be problematic for second language learners whose native language does not use duration contrastively. Recent studies have found improvement in the processing of non-native vowel duration contrasts with the use of listen-and-repeat training, and the current study explores the efficacy of similar methodology on consonant duration contrasts. 18 adult participants underwent two days of listen-and-repeat training with pseudoword stimuli containing either a sibilant or a stop consonant contrast. The results were examined with psychophysiological event-related potentials (mismatch negativity and P3), behavioral discrimination tests and a production task. The results revealed no training-related effects in the event-related potentials or the production task, but behavioral discrimination performance improved. Furthermore, differences emerged between the processing of the two consonant types. The findings suggest that stop consonants are processed more slowly than the sibilants, and the findings are discussed with regard to possible segmentation difficulties.
在母语不使用时长对比的情况下,数量语言的语音时长差异可能会给第二语言学习者带来问题。最近的研究发现,使用听和重复训练可以改善非母语元音时长对比的处理,本研究探讨了类似方法对辅音时长对比的效果。18 名成年参与者接受了两天的听和重复训练,使用包含咝音或塞音对比的假词刺激。使用心理生理事件相关电位(失匹配负波和 P3)、行为辨别测试和产生任务来检查结果。结果显示,事件相关电位或产生任务中没有与训练相关的影响,但行为辨别性能有所提高。此外,两种辅音类型的处理方式存在差异。研究结果表明,塞音比咝音处理得更慢,并且根据可能的分段困难对这些发现进行了讨论。