Suppr超能文献

比较疼痛神经科学与疼痛生物力学教育对新冠疫情期间慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者颈部疼痛及运动恐惧的影响。

Comparison the Effect of Pain Neuroscience and Pain Biomechanics Education on Neck Pain and Fear of Movement in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Khosrokiani Zohre, Letafatkar Amir, Hadadnezhad Malihe, Sokhanguei Yahya

机构信息

Biomechanics and Corrective Exercises Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Mirdamad Blvd., Hesari St, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Pain Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00371-3. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Self-management education is the basis of any intervention for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Given the biopsychosocial nature of chronic musculoskeletal pain, an educational approach based on the biopsychosocial model would seem to be an appropriate educational model for the treatment of these people during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to compare the effect of pain neuroscience education (PNE) and pain biomechanics education, using online and face-to-face sessions on pain and fear of movement, in people with chronic nonspecific neck pain during COVID-19.

METHODS

In this multicenter assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 80 patients (both male and female) with chronic nonspecific neck pain (based on the inclusion criteria of the study) participated in educational sessions (face-to-face and online) from the beginning September until the end of October 2021. The participants were randomly divided into two groups (through the selection of numbers from 1 to 80, hidden in a box), with one group receiving PNE (treatment group) and the other group receiving pain biomechanics education (control group). Pain and fear of movement before and after the intervention were measured on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, respectively. A 2 × 2 variance analysis (treatment group × time) with a mixed-model design was applied to statistically analyze the data.

RESULTS

No significant change in pain (P = 0.23) was observed between the two groups (P = 0.24, Cohen's d = 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.21 to 0.35), while changes in the fear of movement variable were reported to be significant (P = 0.04, Cohen's d = 0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.51), in favor of PNE. Intra-group change was seen only in the PNE group for the fear of movement variable (P = 0.04; 14.28%↓).

CONCLUSION

In our study population PNE did not affect the pain index, leading to the conclusion that PNE should not be used as the only treatment, but possibly in combination with other active/passive therapy to enhance the results for patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain. Moreover, online treatment may help clinicians to increase their interaction with patients during COVID-19 lockdown.

摘要

引言

自我管理教育是对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者进行任何干预的基础。鉴于慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的生物心理社会性质,基于生物心理社会模型的教育方法似乎是在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)期间治疗这些患者的合适教育模式。本研究的目的是比较疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)和疼痛生物力学教育在COVID-19期间对慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者疼痛和运动恐惧的影响,采用线上和面对面授课的方式。

方法

在这项多中心评估者盲法随机对照试验中,80例(男女均有)符合研究纳入标准的慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者于2021年9月初至10月底参加了教育课程(面对面和线上)。参与者通过从藏在盒子里的1到80的数字中抽取,随机分为两组,一组接受PNE(治疗组),另一组接受疼痛生物力学教育(对照组)。分别使用数字疼痛评分量表和坦帕运动恐惧量表测量干预前后的疼痛和运动恐惧。采用混合模型设计的2×2方差分析(治疗组×时间)对数据进行统计分析。

结果

两组之间疼痛无显著变化(P = 0.23)(P = 0.24,科恩d值 = 0.17,95%置信区间[CI] - 0.21至0.35),而运动恐惧变量的变化据报道具有显著性(P = 0.04,科恩d值 = 0.34,95% CI 0.11 - 0.51),有利于PNE。仅在PNE组中观察到运动恐惧变量的组内变化(P = 0.04;下降14.28%)。

结论

在我们的研究人群中,PNE不影响疼痛指数,得出的结论是PNE不应作为唯一的治疗方法,而可能与其他主动/被动疗法联合使用,以提高非特异性慢性颈部疼痛患者的治疗效果。此外,线上治疗可能有助于临床医生在COVID-19封锁期间增加与患者的互动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4a8/9098728/82cd39932dbf/40122_2022_371_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验