Mabeza Russyan Mark S, Maynard Kahtrel, Tarn Derjung M
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Brown University, 69 Brown Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 21;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01662-6.
Telemedicine can be used to manage various health conditions, but there is a need to investigate its effectiveness for chronic disease management in the primary care setting. This study compares the effect of synchronous telemedicine versus in-person primary care visits on patient clinical outcomes.
A systematic review of studies published in PubMed and Web of Science between 1996 and January 2021 was performed using keywords related to telemedicine, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Included studies compared synchronous telemedicine versus in-person visits with a primary care clinician, and examined outcomes of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure, and/or lipid levels.
Of 1724 citations screened, 7 publications met our inclusion criteria. Included studies were published between 2000 and 2018. Three studies were conducted in the United States, 2 in Spain, 1 in Sweden, and 1 in the United Kingdom. The telemedicine interventions investigated were multifaceted. All included synchronous visits with a primary care provider through videoconferencing and/or telephone, combined with other components such as asynchronous patient data transmission. Five studies reported on HbA1c changes, 5 on blood pressure changes, and 3 on changes in lipid levels. Compared to usual care with in-person visits, telemedicine was associated with greater reductions in HbA1c at 6 months and similar HbA1c outcomes at 12 months. Telemedicine conferred no significant differences in blood pressure and lipid levels compared to in-person clinic visits.
A systematic review of the literature found few studies comparing clinical outcomes resulting from synchronous telemedicine versus in-person office visits, but the existing literature showed that in the primary care setting, telemedicine was not inferior to in-person visits for the management of diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. These results hold promise for continued use of telemedicine for chronic disease management.
远程医疗可用于管理多种健康状况,但有必要研究其在初级保健环境中对慢性病管理的有效性。本研究比较了同步远程医疗与面对面初级保健就诊对患者临床结局的影响。
使用与远程医疗、糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症相关的关键词,对1996年至2021年1月期间发表在PubMed和Web of Science上的研究进行系统综述。纳入的研究比较了同步远程医疗与与初级保健临床医生面对面就诊的情况,并检查了糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血压和/或血脂水平的结局。
在筛选的1724篇文献中,7篇符合纳入标准。纳入的研究发表于2000年至2018年之间。3项研究在美国进行,2项在西班牙,1项在瑞典,1项在英国。所研究的远程医疗干预措施是多方面的。所有研究均包括通过视频会议和/或电话与初级保健提供者进行同步就诊,并结合其他组件,如异步患者数据传输。5项研究报告了HbA1c的变化,5项报告了血压变化,3项报告了血脂水平变化。与面对面就诊的常规护理相比,远程医疗在6个月时与HbA1c的更大降低相关,在12个月时HbA1c结局相似。与面对面诊所就诊相比,远程医疗在血压和血脂水平方面没有显著差异。
对文献的系统综述发现,很少有研究比较同步远程医疗与面对面办公室就诊的临床结局,但现有文献表明在初级保健环境中,远程医疗在糖尿病、高血压或高胆固醇血症的管理方面并不逊色于面对面就诊。这些结果为继续使用远程医疗进行慢性病管理带来了希望。