Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1862-1867. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4375-0. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
Optimal management of hypertension requires frequent monitoring and follow-up. Novel, pragmatic interventions have the potential to engage patients, maintain blood pressure control, and enhance access to busy primary care practices. "Virtual visits" are structured asynchronous online interactions between a patient and a clinician to extend medical care beyond the initial office visit.
To compare blood pressure control and healthcare utilization between patients who received virtual visits compared to usual hypertension care.
Propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study with adjustment by difference-in-differences.
Primary care patients with hypertension.
Patient participation in at least one virtual visit for hypertension. Usual care patients did not use a virtual visit but were seen in-person for hypertension.
Adjusted difference in mean systolic blood pressure, primary care office visits, specialist office visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient admissions in the 180 days before and 180 days after the in-person visit.
Of the 1051 virtual visit patients and 24,848 usual care patients, we propensity score-matched 893 patients from each group. Both groups were approximately 61 years old, 44% female, 85% White, had about five chronic conditions, and about 20% had a mean pre-visit systolic blood pressure of 140-160 mmHg. Compared to usual care, virtual visit patients had an adjusted 0.8 (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.2) fewer primary care office visits. There was no significant adjusted difference in systolic blood pressure control (0.6 mmHg [95% CI, - 2.0 to 3.1]), specialist visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, - 0.3 to 0.3]), emergency department visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.01]), or inpatient admissions (0.0 more admissions [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.1]).
Among patients with reasonably well-controlled hypertension, virtual visit participation was associated with equivalent blood pressure control and reduced in-office primary care utilization.
高血压的最佳管理需要频繁监测和随访。新的、实用的干预措施有可能使患者参与其中,维持血压控制,并增强对繁忙的初级保健实践的获取。“虚拟访问”是患者与临床医生之间的结构化异步在线交互,将医疗护理延伸到初始就诊之外。
比较接受虚拟访问的患者与接受常规高血压护理的患者的血压控制和医疗保健利用情况。
倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究,并通过差异中的差异进行调整。
高血压的初级保健患者。
患者至少参加一次高血压虚拟访问。常规护理患者未使用虚拟访问,但因高血压进行了门诊就诊。
在门诊就诊前 180 天和后 180 天,调整后的平均收缩压、初级保健门诊就诊、专科门诊就诊、急诊就诊和住院入院的差异。
在 1051 名虚拟访问患者和 24848 名常规护理患者中,我们对每组各匹配了 893 名患者。两组患者的年龄均约为 61 岁,44%为女性,85%为白人,大约有五种慢性疾病,约 20%的患者就诊前收缩压在 140-160mmHg 之间。与常规护理相比,虚拟访问患者的初级保健门诊就诊次数减少了 0.8 次(95%CI,0.3 至 1.2)。收缩压控制(0.6mmHg[95%CI,-2.0 至 3.1])、专科就诊(0.0 次就诊[95%CI,-0.3 至 0.3])、急诊就诊(0.0 次就诊[95%CI,0.0 至 0.01])或住院入院(0.0 次入院[95%CI,0.0 至 0.1])方面无显著差异。
在血压控制较好的高血压患者中,虚拟访问参与与血压控制等效,减少了门诊初级保健就诊次数。