文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

多节段脊髓型颈椎病的前路与后路手术:一项关于并发症、结局及阿片类药物使用的全国性倾向匹配分析

Anterior vs Posterior Approach in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Nationwide Propensity-Matched Analysis of Complications, Outcomes, and Narcotic Use.

作者信息

Nunna Ravi S, Khalid Syed, Chiu Ryan G, Parola Rown, Fessler Richard G, Adogwa Owoicho, Mehta Ankit I

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):88-94. doi: 10.14444/8198.


DOI:10.14444/8198
PMID:35314510
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9519084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is unclear evidence regarding the optimal surgical approach for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The objective of this study was to compare complications, outcomes, and narcotic use in anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF) vs posterior decompression and fusion (PCDF) in CSM patients. STUDY DESIGN: Registry-based retrospective cohort analysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing 3-level ACDF or PCDF for CSM between 2007 and 2017 were identified from the Humana Claims Database using relevant procedure codes. Propensity score-matched groups were compared in regards to complications, outcomes, and narcotic use. RESULTS: Propensity score matching generated equal cohorts of 6124 patients. The posterior fusion group had a higher rate of urinary tract infection (OR 2.47, < 0.0001), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.90, < 0.0001), and pulmonary embolism (OR 1.75, < 0.0001). In regards to 30-day outcomes, the posterior approach demonstrated higher rates of stroke (OR 1.68, < 0.0001), wound dehiscence (OR 5.59, < 0.0001), Surgical site infection (SSI) (OR 4.76, < 0.0001), wound revision surgery (OR 3.02, < 0.0001), and all-cause readmission (OR 2.01, < 0.0001). One-year outcomes revealed higher rates of pseudarthrosis (4.7% vs 2.0%, OR 2.43, < 0.0001) and revision or extension surgery (OR 2.33, < 0.0001) in the posterior fusion cohort. These patients also demonstrated significantly higher mean morphine milligram equivalent used at 30 days (OR 1.19, < 0.0001), as well as 60 (OR 1.20, < 0.0001), 90 (OR 1.21, < 0.0001), and 120 (OR 1.21, < 0.0001) days. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide propensity-matched analysis of multilevel CSM patients found the posterior approach to be associated with increased rates of inpatient complications, wound complications, 30-day readmission, 1-year pseudarthrosis, and 1-year revision or extension surgery. These patients also demonstrated higher levels of narcotic use up to 120 days after surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The posterior approach for treatment of CSM may be associated with increased rates of short- and long-term complications in addition to increased narcotic consumption in comparison to the anterior approach.

摘要

背景:关于多节段脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)的最佳手术方法,目前证据尚不明确。本研究的目的是比较CSM患者行前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与后路减压融合术(PCDF)后的并发症、治疗效果及麻醉药物使用情况。 研究设计:基于注册登记的回顾性队列分析。 方法:使用相关手术编码,从Humana索赔数据库中识别出2007年至2017年间因CSM接受三节段ACDF或PCDF手术的患者。对倾向评分匹配组的并发症、治疗效果及麻醉药物使用情况进行比较。 结果:倾向评分匹配产生了每组6124例患者的相等队列。后路融合组尿路感染发生率较高(比值比[OR] 2.47,P<0.0001)、深静脉血栓形成发生率较高(OR 1.90,P<0.0001)、肺栓塞发生率较高(OR 1.75,P<0.0001)。关于30天的治疗效果,后路手术显示中风发生率较高(OR 1.68,P<0.0001)、伤口裂开发生率较高(OR 5.59,P<0.0001)、手术部位感染(SSI)发生率较高(OR 4.76,P<0.0001)、伤口修复手术发生率较高(OR 3.02,P<0.0001)以及全因再入院发生率较高(OR 2.01,P<0.0001)。1年的治疗效果显示,后路融合队列中假关节形成发生率较高(4.7%对2.0%,OR 2.43,P<0.0001)以及翻修或延长手术发生率较高(OR 2.33,P<0.0001)。这些患者在30天时平均吗啡毫克当量使用量也显著更高(OR 1.19,P<0.0001),在60天(OR 1.20,P<0.0001)、90天(OR 1.21,P<0.0001)和120天(OR 1.21,P<0.0001)时也是如此。 结论:这项对多节段CSM患者进行的全国性倾向评分匹配分析发现,后路手术与住院并发症、伤口并发症、30天再入院、1年假关节形成以及1年翻修或延长手术的发生率增加相关。这些患者在术后120天内麻醉药物使用水平也更高。 临床意义:与前路手术相比,后路治疗CSM的方法可能不仅会增加短期和长期并发症的发生率,还会增加麻醉药物的消耗量。

相似文献

[1]
Anterior vs Posterior Approach in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Nationwide Propensity-Matched Analysis of Complications, Outcomes, and Narcotic Use.

Int J Spine Surg. 2022-2

[2]
Comparison of the Inpatient Complications and Health Care Costs of Anterior versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Patients with Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

World Neurosurg. 2019-9-28

[3]
Surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of a national, administrative, longitudinal database.

Neurosurg Focus. 2016-6

[4]
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015-9

[5]
Impact of Preoperative Frailty on Outcomes in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing Anterior vs. Posterior Cervical Surgery.

J Clin Med. 2023-12-25

[6]
Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Insights from a National Registry.

World Neurosurg. 2019-8-5

[7]
What Is the Impact of Surgical Approach in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in Patients With OPLL? A Propensity-Score Matched, Multi-Center Analysis on Inpatient and Post-Discharge 90-Day Outcomes.

Global Spine J. 2023-3

[8]
Bundled payment reimbursement for anterior and posterior approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of private payer and Medicare databases.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2018-3

[9]
Postoperative 30-Day Comparative Complications of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: An Evidence in Reaching Consensus.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023-6-10

[10]
Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Interventions for Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy via Anterior Approach: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Pain Physician. 2019-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches for functional improvement in cervical myelopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 33,025 patients.

N Am Spine Soc J. 2024-11-13

[2]
[Comparison of effectiveness between zero-profile anchored cage and plate-cage construct in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis].

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025-2-15

[3]
Analysis of Complications in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Osteobiologics Other than Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Systematic Review.

Global Spine J. 2024-2

[4]
A Retrospective Study of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and the Surgical Management Within Northern Ireland.

Cureus. 2023-11-27

[5]
Overloaded vertebral body: a unique radiographic phenomenon following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023-11-18

[6]
Posterior endoscopic decompression combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective case-control study.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023-7-15

[7]
Letter to the Editor: Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity between Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Performed in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings.

Asian Spine J. 2023-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Anterior versus posterior approach for the therapy of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019-6

[2]
Comparison of Outcomes Following Anterior vs Posterior Fusion Surgery for Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Analysis From Quality Outcomes Database.

Neurosurgery. 2019-4-1

[3]
Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of the AOSpine North America and International Prospective Multicenter Studies.

Neurosurgery. 2019-4-1

[4]
Anterior versus posterior approach to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, clinical and radiological results with long period of follow-up.

SAGE Open Med. 2018-4-10

[5]
Opioid use following cervical spine surgery: trends and factors associated with long-term use.

Spine J. 2018-4-10

[6]
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Clinical Review.

Yale J Biol Med. 2018-3-28

[7]
Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay and 30-Day Readmission in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients: An Analysis of 3057 Patients Using the ACS-NSQIP Database.

World Neurosurg. 2018-2

[8]
Current Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Global Spine J. 2017-9

[9]
Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An MRI-Based Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis Using Data from the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine CSM North America and International Studies.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017-6-21

[10]
Trends in Utilization and Cost of Cervical Spine Surgery Using the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2001 to 2013.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017-8-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索