Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Cell Death Differ. 2022 May;29(5):921-937. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00975-4. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
The p53 protein family is the most studied protein family of all. Sequence analysis and structure determination have revealed a high similarity of crucial domains between p53, p63 and p73. Functional studies, however, have shown a wide variety of different tasks in tumor suppression, quality control and development. Here we review the structure and organization of the individual domains of p63 and p73, the interaction of these domains in the context of full-length proteins and discuss the evolutionary origin of this protein family. FACTS: Distinct physiological roles/functions are performed by specific isoforms. The non-divided transactivation domain of p63 has a constitutively high activity while the transactivation domains of p53/p73 are divided into two subdomains that are regulated by phosphorylation. Mdm2 binds to all three family members but ubiquitinates only p53. TAp63α forms an autoinhibited dimeric state while all other vertebrate p53 family isoforms are constitutively tetrameric. The oligomerization domain of p63 and p73 contain an additional helix that is necessary for stabilizing the tetrameric states. During evolution this helix got lost independently in different phylogenetic branches, while the DNA binding domain became destabilized and the transactivation domain split into two subdomains. OPEN QUESTIONS: Is the autoinhibitory mechanism of mammalian TAp63α conserved in p53 proteins of invertebrates that have the same function of genomic quality control in germ cells? What is the physiological function of the p63/p73 SAM domains? Do the short isoforms of p63 and p73 have physiological functions? What are the roles of the N-terminal elongated TAp63 isoforms, TA* and GTA?
p53 蛋白家族是所有蛋白家族中研究得最多的。序列分析和结构测定揭示了 p53、p63 和 p73 之间关键结构域的高度相似性。然而,功能研究表明,它们在肿瘤抑制、质量控制和发育等方面具有广泛的不同功能。本文综述了 p63 和 p73 各结构域的结构和组织,讨论了全长蛋白中这些结构域的相互作用,并探讨了该蛋白家族的进化起源。事实:特定的异构体执行不同的生理作用/功能。p63 的非分裂转录激活域具有固有高活性,而 p53/p73 的转录激活域则分为两个亚结构域,受磷酸化调节。Mdm2 与这三个家族成员结合,但仅泛素化 p53。TAp63α 形成自动抑制的二聚体状态,而所有其他脊椎动物 p53 家族异构体都是组成型四聚体。p63 和 p73 的寡聚化结构域包含一个额外的螺旋,该螺旋对于稳定四聚体状态是必需的。在进化过程中,这个螺旋在不同的进化枝中独立丢失,而 DNA 结合结构域变得不稳定,转录激活结构域分裂成两个亚结构域。开放性问题:哺乳动物 TAp63α 的自动抑制机制是否在具有相同生殖细胞基因组质量控制功能的无脊椎动物 p53 蛋白中保守?p63/p73 SAM 结构域的生理功能是什么?p63 和 p73 的短异构体是否具有生理功能?p63 的 TA* 和 GTA 等 N 端延长 TAp63 异构体的作用是什么?
Cell Death Differ. 2022-5
Oncogene. 2015-8-13
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000
BMC Evol Biol. 2017-8-3
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025-2-27
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2025-5
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024-12-13
Cell Death Dis. 2024-12-3
Nucleic Acids Res. 2024-12-11
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022-2
Cell Death Dis. 2021-7-27
Cell Death Differ. 2021-7
Cancers (Basel). 2021-1-31
Nat Commun. 2021-1-15
Nat Chem Biol. 2020-7-27
Cell Cycle. 2020-7