• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在痴呆筛查与风险因素应用程序中优化现有心理健康筛查方法:观察性机器学习研究

Optimizing Existing Mental Health Screening Methods in a Dementia Screening and Risk Factor App: Observational Machine Learning Study.

作者信息

Kuleindiren Narayan, Rifkin-Zybutz Raphael Paul, Johal Monika, Selim Hamzah, Palmon Itai, Lin Aaron, Yu Yizhou, Alim-Marvasti Ali, Mahmud Mohammad

机构信息

Mindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.

Imperial College School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 22;6(3):e31209. doi: 10.2196/31209.

DOI:10.2196/31209
PMID:35315786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8984825/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mindstep is an app that aims to improve dementia screening by assessing cognition and risk factors. It considers important clinical risk factors, including prodromal symptoms, mental health disorders, and differential diagnoses of dementia. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire for depression (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) are widely validated and commonly used scales used in screening for depression and anxiety disorders, respectively. Shortened versions of both (PHQ-2/GAD-2) have been produced.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop a method that maintained the brevity of these shorter questionnaires while maintaining the better precision of the original questionnaires.

METHODS

Single questions were designed to encompass symptoms covered in the original questionnaires. Answers to these questions were combined with PHQ-2/GAD-2, and anonymized risk factors were collected by Mindset4Dementia from 2235 users. Machine learning models were trained to use these single questions in combination with data already collected by the app: age, response to a joke, and reporting of functional impairment to predict binary and continuous outcomes as measured using PHQ-9/GAD-7. Our model was developed with a training data set by using 10-fold cross-validation and a holdout testing data set and compared to results from using the shorter questionnaires (PHQ-2/GAD-2) alone to benchmark performance.

RESULTS

We were able to achieve superior performance in predicting PHQ-9/GAD-7 screening cutoffs compared to PHQ-2 (difference in area under the curve 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.08, P=.02) but not GAD-2 (difference in area under the curve 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.03, P=.42). Regression models were able to accurately predict total questionnaire scores in PHQ-9 (R=0.655, mean absolute error=2.267) and GAD-7 (R=0.837, mean absolute error=1.780).

CONCLUSIONS

We app-adapted PHQ-4 by adding brief summary questions about factors normally covered in the longer questionnaires. We additionally trained machine learning models that used the wide range of additional information already collected in Mindstep to make a short app-based screening tool for affective disorders, which appears to have superior or equivalent performance to well-established methods.

摘要

背景

Mindstep是一款旨在通过评估认知和风险因素来改善痴呆筛查的应用程序。它考虑了重要的临床风险因素,包括前驱症状、心理健康障碍以及痴呆的鉴别诊断。用于筛查抑郁症的9项患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)和用于筛查焦虑症的7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD - 7)是经过广泛验证且常用的量表。两者都有缩短版本(PHQ - 2/GAD - 2)。

目的

我们试图开发一种方法,在保持这些较短问卷简洁性的同时,维持原始问卷更高的精准度。

方法

设计单个问题以涵盖原始问卷中的症状。这些问题的答案与PHQ - 2/GAD - 2相结合,Mindset4Dementia从2235名用户那里收集了匿名风险因素。训练机器学习模型,将这些单个问题与应用程序已经收集的数据(年龄、对笑话的反应以及功能障碍报告)结合起来,以预测使用PHQ - 9/GAD - 7衡量的二元和连续结果。我们的模型通过使用10折交叉验证的训练数据集和一个保留测试数据集来开发,并与仅使用较短问卷(PHQ - 2/GAD - 2)的结果进行比较,以评估性能。

结果

与PHQ - 2相比,我们在预测PHQ - 9/GAD - 7筛查临界值方面能够实现更优的性能(曲线下面积差异为0.04,95%置信区间为0.00 - 0.08,P = 0.02),但与GAD - 2相比则不然(曲线下面积差异为0.00,95%置信区间为 - 0.02至0.03,P = 0.42)。回归模型能够准确预测PHQ - 9(R = 0.655,平均绝对误差 = 2.267)和GAD - 7(R = 0.837,平均绝对误差 = 1.780)的问卷总分。

结论

我们通过添加关于较长问卷中通常涵盖因素的简短总结问题对PHQ - 4进行了应用适配。我们还训练机器学习模型,该模型利用Mindstep中已经收集的广泛额外信息,制作了一个基于应用程序的情感障碍简短筛查工具,其性能似乎优于或等同于成熟方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/74ad10af7bb5/formative_v6i3e31209_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/279703822b71/formative_v6i3e31209_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/04ee8ca16510/formative_v6i3e31209_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/6ca94018845e/formative_v6i3e31209_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/74ad10af7bb5/formative_v6i3e31209_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/279703822b71/formative_v6i3e31209_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/04ee8ca16510/formative_v6i3e31209_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/6ca94018845e/formative_v6i3e31209_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8eb/8984825/74ad10af7bb5/formative_v6i3e31209_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing Existing Mental Health Screening Methods in a Dementia Screening and Risk Factor App: Observational Machine Learning Study.在痴呆筛查与风险因素应用程序中优化现有心理健康筛查方法:观察性机器学习研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 22;6(3):e31209. doi: 10.2196/31209.
2
Self-Directed Engagement with a Mobile App (Sinasprite) and Its Effects on Confidence in Coping Skills, Depression, and Anxiety: Retrospective Longitudinal Study.自我指导使用一款移动应用程序(Sinasprite)及其对应对技能信心、抑郁和焦虑的影响:回顾性纵向研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 16;6(3):e64. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9612.
3
Validation of brief screening measures for depression and anxiety in young people with substance use disorders.验证用于物质使用障碍的年轻人的抑郁和焦虑的简短筛查措施。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:1021-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review.患者健康问卷躯体、焦虑和抑郁症状量表:系统评价。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):345-59. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 May 7.
5
Validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 and the generalized anxiety disorder-7 in Lithuanian student sample.验证患者健康问卷-9 和广泛性焦虑障碍-7 在立陶宛学生样本中的应用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0263027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263027. eCollection 2022.
6
Examination of the best cut-off points of PHQ-2 and GAD-2 for detecting depression and anxiety in Italian cardiovascular inpatients.探讨 PHQ-2 和 GAD-2 在意大利心血管住院患者中检测抑郁和焦虑的最佳截断值。
Psychol Health. 2021 Sep;36(9):1088-1101. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1830093. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Feasibility and utility of screening for depression and anxiety disorders in patients with cardiovascular disease.对心血管疾病患者进行抑郁和焦虑症筛查的可行性及实用性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):498-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000049. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
8
Examining brief and ultra-brief anxiety and depression screening methods in a real-world epilepsy clinic sample.在真实世界的癫痫诊所样本中检查简短和超简短的焦虑和抑郁筛查方法。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107943. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107943. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population.一个包含四项指标的抑郁和焦虑测量工具:一般人群中患者健康问卷-4(PHQ-4)的验证和标准化。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Apr;122(1-2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
10
Exploring the relationship between generalised anxiety/depression scales and asthma-specific quality of life/control questionnaires in a specialist asthma clinic.探讨在专科哮喘诊所中广泛性焦虑/抑郁量表与哮喘特定生活质量/控制问卷之间的关系。
J Asthma. 2021 Jul;58(7):912-920. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1744640. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjective brain fog: a four-dimensional characterization in 25,796 participants.主观脑雾:25796名参与者的四维特征分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 6;18:1409250. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1409250. eCollection 2024.
2
Validation of a rapid remote digital test for impaired cognition using clinical dementia rating and mini-mental state examination: An observational research study.使用临床痴呆评定量表和简易精神状态检查表对认知障碍快速远程数字测试进行验证:一项观察性研究。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Dec 21;4:1029810. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1029810. eCollection 2022.
3
Hierarchical clustering of prolonged post-concussive symptoms after 12 months: symptom-centric analysis and association with functional impairments.

本文引用的文献

1
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀委员会2020年报告》
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
2
From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.利用可解释人工智能实现从局部解释到树木的全局理解
Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
12 个月后持续性脑震荡后症状的层次聚类:以症状为中心的分析及其与功能障碍的关联。
Brain Inj. 2023 Mar 21;37(4):317-328. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2158229. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
单独使用 PHQ-2 与 PHQ-9 联合使用进行筛查以检测重度抑郁症的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2290-2300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6504.
4
Comparison of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening depression in older adults.老年抑郁量表-15 与患者健康问卷-9 用于筛查老年人抑郁的比较。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Feb;20(2):138-143. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13840. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
5
Paying attention to attention in depression.关注抑郁中的注意力。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 7;9(1):279. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0616-1.
6
Using Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning to Predict Postpartum Depression.利用电子健康记录和机器学习预测产后抑郁症。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:888-892. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190351.
7
Prevalence of Anxiety Symptoms and Their Association With Loss Experience in a Large Cohort Sample of the Oldest-Old. Results of the AgeCoDe/AgeQualiDe Study.高龄老人大样本队列中焦虑症状的患病率及其与丧失经历的关联。AgeCoDe/AgeQualiDe研究结果
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 8;10:285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00285. eCollection 2019.
8
Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis.使用广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7(GAD-7)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表-2(GAD-2)筛查焦虑症:一项系统评价与诊断性荟萃分析
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar-Apr;39:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
9
The Neurobiology of Motivational Deficits in Depression--An Update on Candidate Pathomechanisms.抑郁症动机缺陷的神经生物学——候选病理机制的最新进展
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016;27:337-55. doi: 10.1007/7854_2015_400.
10
The validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire for screening depression in chronic care patients in primary health care in South Africa.南非初级卫生保健中慢性护理患者使用患者健康问卷筛查抑郁的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 23;15:118. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0503-0.