Celano Christopher M, Suarez Laura, Mastromauro Carol, Januzzi James L, Huffman Jeff C
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):498-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000049. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
Depression and anxiety in patients with cardiac disease are common and independently associated with morbidity and mortality. We aimed to explore the use of a 3-step approach to identify inpatients with cardiac disease with depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or panic disorder; understand the predictive value of individual screening items in identifying these disorders; and assess the relative prevalence of these disorders in this cohort.
To identify depression and anxiety disorders in inpatients with cardiac disease as part of a care management trial, an iterative 3-step screening procedure was used. This included an existing 4-item (Coping Screen) tool in nursing data sets, a 5-item screen for positive Coping Screen patients (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 [PHQ-2], GAD-2, and an item about panic attacks), and a diagnostic evaluation using PHQ-9 and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders anxiety disorder modules. Overall, 6210 inpatients received the Coping Screen, 581 completed portions of all 3 evaluation steps, and 210 received a diagnosis (143 depression, 129 GAD, 30 panic disorder). Controlling for age, sex, and the other screening items, PHQ-2 items independently predicted depression (little interest/pleasure: odds ratio [OR]=6.65, P<0.001; depression: OR=5.24, P=0.001), GAD-2 items predicted GAD (anxious: OR=4.09, P=0.003; unable to control worrying: OR=10.46, P<0.001), and the panic item predicted panic disorder (OR=49.61, P<0.001).
GAD was nearly as prevalent as depression in this cohort, and GAD-2 was an effective screening tool; however, panic disorder was rare. These results support the use of 2-step screening for depression and GAD beginning with a 4-item scale (GAD-2 plus PHQ-2).
Unique Identifier: NCT01201967. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01201967.
心脏病患者中抑郁和焦虑很常见,且与发病率和死亡率独立相关。我们旨在探索采用三步法来识别患有抑郁症、广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)或惊恐障碍的心脏病住院患者;了解各个筛查项目在识别这些疾病中的预测价值;并评估该队列中这些疾病的相对患病率。
作为一项护理管理试验的一部分,为识别心脏病住院患者中的抑郁和焦虑障碍,采用了迭代三步筛查程序。这包括护理数据集中现有的4项(应对筛查)工具、对应对筛查结果为阳性的患者进行的5项筛查(患者健康问卷-2 [PHQ-2]、广泛性焦虑障碍问卷-2 [GAD-2]以及一项关于惊恐发作的项目),以及使用PHQ-9和精神障碍初级保健评估焦虑障碍模块进行的诊断评估。总体而言,6210名住院患者接受了应对筛查,581人完成了所有三个评估步骤中的部分内容,210人获得了诊断(143例抑郁症、129例广泛性焦虑障碍、30例惊恐障碍)。在控制年龄、性别和其他筛查项目后,PHQ-2项目独立预测抑郁症(兴趣/愉悦感低:比值比[OR]=6.65,P<0.001;抑郁情绪:OR=5.24,P=0.001),GAD-2项目预测广泛性焦虑障碍(焦虑:OR=4.09,P=0.003;无法控制担忧:OR=10.46,P<0.001),而惊恐项目预测惊恐障碍(OR=49.61,P<0.001)。
在该队列中,广泛性焦虑障碍的患病率与抑郁症相近,且GAD-2是一种有效的筛查工具;然而,惊恐障碍较为罕见。这些结果支持从一个4项量表(GAD-2加PHQ-2)开始对抑郁症和广泛性焦虑障碍进行两步筛查。
唯一标识符:NCT01201967。网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01201967。