患者与临床医生在预防保健决策中的协作和共同决策,以及美国预防服务工作组的建议。

Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

机构信息

Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, New York, New York.

University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Mar 22;327(12):1171-1176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.3267.

Abstract

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) works to improve the health of people nationwide by making evidence-based recommendations for preventive services. Patient-centered care is a core value in US health care. Shared decision-making (SDM), in which patients and clinicians make health decisions together, ensures patients' rights to be informed and involved in preventive care decisions and that these decisions are patient-centered. SDM has a role across the spectrum of USPSTF recommendations. For A or B recommendations (judged by the USPSTF to have high or moderate certainty of a moderate or substantial net benefit at the population level), SDM allows individual patients to decide whether to accept such services based on their personal values and preferences. For C recommendations (indicating at least moderate certainty of a small net benefit at the population level), SDM is critical for individual patients to decide whether the net benefit for them is worthwhile. For D recommendations (reflecting at least moderate certainty of a zero or negative net benefit) or I statements (low certainty of net benefit), clinicians should be prepared to discuss these services if patients ask. More evidence is needed to determine if, in addition to promoting patient-centeredness, SDM reduces inequities in preventive care, as well as to define new strategies to find time for discussion of preventive services in primary care.

摘要

美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)致力于通过为预防服务制定基于证据的建议来改善全国人民的健康。以患者为中心的护理是美国医疗保健的核心价值观。共同决策(SDM)是指患者和临床医生共同做出健康决策,确保患者有权获得信息并参与预防保健决策,并且这些决策以患者为中心。SDM 在 USPSTF 建议的范围内发挥作用。对于 A 或 B 级推荐(USPSTF 判断在人群水平上具有中度或高度确定性,中等或实质性净收益),SDM 允许根据个人价值观和偏好,个别患者决定是否接受此类服务。对于 C 级推荐(表示在人群水平上至少有中度确定性的净收益较小),SDM 对于个别患者决定对他们来说净收益是否值得至关重要。对于 D 级推荐(反映至少有中度确定性的零或负净收益)或 I 声明(净收益的确定性较低),如果患者询问,临床医生应该准备好讨论这些服务。需要更多的证据来确定 SDM 是否除了促进以患者为中心之外,还可以减少预防保健方面的不平等,以及确定新的策略来寻找时间在初级保健中讨论预防服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索