Suppr超能文献

在膝关节骨关节炎治疗中,富血小板血浆与其他疗法相比在临床效果上如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

How Does Platelet-Rich Plasma Compare Clinically to Other Therapies in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Costa Lauro Augusto Veloso, Lenza Mário, Irrgang James J, Fu Freddie H, Ferretti Mário

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(4):1074-1086. doi: 10.1177/03635465211062243. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been an increase in interest in the use of biological therapies in orthopaedic conditions such as knee osteoarthritis. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one of these therapies, but it still lacks consistent results.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects (benefits and harms) of PRP intra-articular injection compared with other nonsurgical methods for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies published before January 2021. The primary outcomes were pain, function, and failure of treatment. Risks of bias of all trials were assessed using a Cochrane risk of bias tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System was used to assess the quality of evidence of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies with 3035 participants were included. Analysis of this review focused on comparing PRP with hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid, and saline, as we believe they are the most relevant comparisons with the most studies available. At 6-month follow-up, PRP was as effective as and in some studies more effective than other therapies regarding pain, function, and stiffness. However, current evidence is of low or very low quality and is based on trials with high risk of bias and great heterogeneity among them. No significant difference among treatments was found concerning major adverse events and treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Although studies suggest that PRP may be more effective than or at least as effective as other modalities of nonsurgical treatment for knee osteoarthritis in terms of pain, function, and adverse events, serious limitations and methodological flaws are considerable in the current literature. Therefore, the authors are not able to make recommendations for clinical practice regarding PRP for knee osteoarthritis.

摘要

背景

在诸如膝关节骨关节炎等骨科疾病中,生物疗法的应用越来越受到关注。富血小板血浆(PRP)就是其中一种疗法,但仍缺乏一致的疗效。

目的

评估与其他非手术方法相比,PRP关节内注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎的效果(益处和危害)。

研究设计

对随机和半随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析;证据等级为2级。

方法

检索三个电子数据库,以识别2021年1月之前发表的相关研究。主要结局指标为疼痛、功能和治疗失败情况。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估所有试验的偏倚风险。采用推荐意见分级评估、制定与评价系统来评估纳入研究的证据质量。

结果

共纳入40项研究,涉及3035名参与者。本综述的分析重点是将PRP与透明质酸、皮质类固醇和生理盐水进行比较,因为我们认为它们是与现有研究最多的最相关的比较对象。在6个月的随访中,PRP在疼痛、功能和僵硬方面与其他疗法效果相当,在某些研究中甚至更有效。然而,目前的证据质量低或极低,且基于偏倚风险高且异质性大的试验。在主要不良事件和治疗失败方面,各治疗组之间未发现显著差异。

结论

尽管研究表明,在疼痛、功能和不良事件方面,PRP可能比其他非手术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的方法更有效或至少与之效果相当,但当前文献中存在严重的局限性和方法学缺陷。因此,作者无法就PRP治疗膝关节骨关节炎的临床应用提出建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验