Kanu Chisom, Brown Carolyn M, Rascati Karen, Moczygemba Leticia R, Mackert Michael, Wilfong Lalan
College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):5533-5538. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06988-6. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
Health literacy is recognized as a critical factor affecting communication across the continuum of cancer care and plays a key role in patients' ability to meaningfully discuss their condition with healthcare providers. However, there is no consensus on the best approach to measure health literacy in clinical practice. The aims of this study were to compare general and disease-specific measurements of health literacy in patients with breast cancer as well as examine their relationships with patient-provider communication. During office visits, patients with HER-2 + breast cancer who received care at oncology clinics with value-based models of care completed a survey including the 6-item cancer health literacy tool (CHLT-6), 6-item newest vital sign (NVS), 2 items measuring difficulty of patient-provider communication, and 11 demographic/clinical items. The mean age of 146 participants was 57.1 ± 10.8 years. Most participants had adequate general health literacy as measured by the NVS (79%) and a high probability of adequate cancer health literacy (≥ 0.7) as measured by the CHLT-6 (92%). Most patients easily communicated with healthcare providers (90.2%) and understood information they provided (83.5%). However, there was no significant relationship between patient-provider communication and health literacy. Both the CHLT-6 and NVS may be useful tools to assess the health literacy of patients with cancer in clinical practice. Study findings of adequate health literacy and ease of communication might have been influenced by the value-based care models adopted by participating clinics. Further research in more diverse samples of patients with cancer and different types of oncology practice settings is warranted.
健康素养被认为是影响癌症连续护理过程中沟通的关键因素,并且在患者与医疗服务提供者有意义地讨论自身病情的能力方面发挥着关键作用。然而,在临床实践中衡量健康素养的最佳方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是比较乳腺癌患者健康素养的一般测量方法和疾病特异性测量方法,并研究它们与医患沟通的关系。在门诊就诊期间,在采用基于价值的护理模式的肿瘤诊所接受治疗的HER-2+乳腺癌患者完成了一项调查,其中包括6项癌症健康素养工具(CHLT-6)、6项最新生命体征(NVS)、2项测量医患沟通困难程度的项目以及11项人口统计学/临床项目。146名参与者的平均年龄为57.1±10.8岁。根据NVS测量,大多数参与者具有足够的一般健康素养(79%),根据CHLT-6测量,具有足够癌症健康素养(≥0.7)的可能性很高(92%)。大多数患者与医疗服务提供者沟通顺畅(90.2%),并理解他们提供的信息(83.5%)。然而,医患沟通与健康素养之间没有显著关系。CHLT-6和NVS在临床实践中可能都是评估癌症患者健康素养的有用工具。关于足够健康素养和沟通便利性的研究结果可能受到了参与诊所采用的基于价值的护理模式的影响。有必要在更多样化的癌症患者样本和不同类型的肿瘤学实践环境中进行进一步研究。