Suppr超能文献

美国诊断患有癌症的育龄妇女在生育服务利用方面的社会人口统计学差异。

Sociodemographic differences in utilization of fertility services among reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer in the USA.

机构信息

NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NY, New York, USA.

NYU Langone Department of Urology, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Apr;39(4):963-972. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02455-7. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether sociodemographic differences exist among female patients accessing fertility services post-cancer diagnosis in a representative sample of the United States population.

METHODS

All women ages 15-45 with a history of cancer who responded to the National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) from 2011 to 2017 were included. The population was then stratified into 2 groups, defined as those who did and did not seek infertility services. The demographic characteristics of age, legal marital status, education, race, religion, insurance status, access to healthcare, and self-perceived health were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome measure was the utilization of fertility services. The complex sample analysis using the provided sample weights required by the NSFG survey design was used.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty-five women reported a history of cancer and were included in this study. Forty-three (7.89%) pursued fertility services after their cancer diagnosis. Using the NSFG sample weights, this equates to a population of 161,500.7 female cancer survivors in the USA who did utilize fertility services and 1,811,955.3 women who did not. Using multivariable analysis, household income, marital status, and race were significantly associated with women utilizing fertility services following a cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationally representative cohort of reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer, there are marital, socioeconomic, and racial differences between those who utilized fertility services and those who did not. This difference did not appear to be due to insurance coverage, access to healthcare, or perceived health status.

摘要

目的

在美国人群代表性样本中,确定在癌症诊断后接受生育服务的女性患者在社会人口统计学方面是否存在差异。

方法

所有年龄在 15-45 岁之间、有癌症病史且对 2011 年至 2017 年国家家庭增长调查(NSFG)做出回应的女性均包括在内。然后,将人群分为两组,一组定义为寻求不孕服务,另一组定义为未寻求不孕服务。对两组患者的年龄、合法婚姻状况、教育程度、种族、宗教、保险状况、获得医疗保健的机会以及自我感知健康状况等人口统计学特征进行比较。主要观察指标是生育服务的利用情况。使用 NSFG 调查设计中提供的样本权重进行复杂样本分析。

结果

共有 545 名女性报告有癌症病史,纳入本研究。其中 43 名(7.89%)在癌症诊断后寻求生育服务。使用 NSFG 样本权重,这相当于美国有 161,500.7 名曾利用生育服务的癌症幸存者和 1,811,955.3 名未利用生育服务的女性。多变量分析显示,家庭收入、婚姻状况和种族与女性在癌症诊断后利用生育服务显著相关。

结论

在本项针对癌症诊断后处于生育年龄的女性的全国代表性队列研究中,利用生育服务的女性与未利用生育服务的女性在婚姻、社会经济和种族方面存在差异。这种差异似乎不是由于保险覆盖范围、获得医疗保健的机会或自我感知的健康状况所致。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic differences in utilization of fertility services among reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer in the USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Apr;39(4):963-972. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02455-7. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
Evaluating the unevaluated: a secondary analysis of the National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) examining infertile women who did not access care.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1071-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02149-6. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
8
Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States.
Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;100(4):1025-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.040. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
9
Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995.
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 May-Jun;32(3):132-7.
10
Infertility in the Midwest: perceptions and attitudes of current treatment.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):61.e1-61.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

2
The era of increasing cancer survivorship: Trends in fertility preservation, medico-legal implications, and ethical challenges.
Open Med (Wars). 2025 Feb 12;20(1):20251144. doi: 10.1515/med-2025-1144. eCollection 2025.
5
Disparities in fertility preservation among patients diagnosed with female breast cancer.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Dec;40(12):2843-2849. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02968-9. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
6
Disparities in Female Oncofertility Care in the United States: More Questions Than Answers.
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;13(7):1547. doi: 10.3390/life13071547.
7
Disparities in the use of assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: a population-based study.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Feb;198(1):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06857-0. Epub 2023 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion.
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jul;116(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.019.
2
Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Dec;37(12):3095-3102. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01980-7. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
Fertility in female cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jul;41(1):96-112. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
4
Use of fertility preservation services in female reproductive-aged cancer patients.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):328.e1-328.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 18.
7
Disparities in Counseling Female Cancer Patients for Fertility Preservation.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Aug;26(8):886-891. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5997. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
The Best Age for Pregnancy and Undue Pressures.
J Family Reprod Health. 2016 Sep;10(3):104-107.
9
Do Patient Characteristics Decide if Young Adult Cancer Patients Undergo Fertility Preservation?
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Jun;6(2):223-228. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0071. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
10
Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):212.e1-212.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验