Suppr超能文献

评估未评估者:对国家家庭增长调查(NSFG)的二次分析,调查未寻求治疗的不孕女性。

Evaluating the unevaluated: a secondary analysis of the National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) examining infertile women who did not access care.

机构信息

NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1071-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02149-6. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize the demographic differences between infertile/sub-fertile women who utilized infertility services vs. those that do not.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data obtained during the 2011-2013, 2013-2015, and 2015-2017 cycles of National Survey for Family Growth from interviews administered in home for randomly selected participants by a National Center of Health Statistics (NCHS) surveyor was used to analyze married, divorced, or women with long-term partners who reported difficulty having biological children (sub-fertile/infertile women). Demographic differences such as formal marital status, education, race, and religion were compared between women who presented for infertility care vs. those that did not. The primary outcome measure was presenting for infertility evaluation and subsequently utilizing infertility services. Healthcare utilization trends such as having a usual place of care and insurance status were also included as exposures of interest in the analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 12,456 women included in the analysis 1770 (15.3%) had used infertility services and 1011 (8.3%) said it would be difficult for them to have a child but had not accessed infertility services. On univariate analysis, compared to women who used infertility services, untreated women had lower average household incomes (295.3 vs. 229.8% of the federal poverty line respectively). Untreated women also had lower levels of education and were more likely to be divorced or never have married. In terms of health status, unevaluated women were less likely to have a usual place for healthcare (87.3%) as compared to women presenting for fertility care (91.9%) (p = 0.004). When examining insurance status, 23.3% of unevaluated women were uninsured as compared to 8.3% of evaluated women. On multivariate analysis, infertile women without insurance were at 0.37 odds of utilizing infertility care compared to women with insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic factors are associated with the utilization of infertility care. Insurance status is a significant predictor of whether or not infertile women will access treatment. Data from the three most recent NSFG surveys along with prior analyses demonstrate the need for expanded insurance coverage in order to address the socioeconomic disparities between infertile women who are accessing services vs. those that are not.

摘要

目的

描述利用不孕不育服务的不孕/低育女性与未利用该服务的女性之间的人口统计学差异。

方法

对 2011-2013 年、2013-2015 年和 2015-2017 年全国生育力调查期间获得的横断面数据进行回顾性分析,这些数据来自全国卫生统计中心(NCHS)调查员对随机选择的参与者在家中进行的访谈。分析已婚、离婚或与长期伴侣报告生育生物学子女困难的女性(低育/不孕女性)。比较了接受不孕不育治疗的女性与未接受治疗的女性之间的人口统计学差异,如正式婚姻状况、教育程度、种族和宗教。主要结局指标是接受不孕不育评估并随后利用不孕不育服务。分析中还包括医疗保健利用趋势,如是否有常规医疗场所和保险状况。

结果

在纳入分析的 12456 名女性中,有 1770 名(15.3%)使用了不孕不育服务,有 1011 名(8.3%)表示生育孩子困难,但未接受不孕不育服务。在单变量分析中,与使用不孕不育服务的女性相比,未治疗的女性平均家庭收入较低(分别为联邦贫困线的 295.3%和 229.8%)。未治疗的女性受教育程度也较低,更有可能离婚或从未结婚。在健康状况方面,未评估的女性拥有常规医疗场所的可能性低于接受生育力治疗的女性(分别为 87.3%和 91.9%)(p = 0.004)。在检查保险状况时,未评估的女性中有 23.3%未参保,而评估的女性中有 8.3%未参保。多变量分析显示,无保险的不孕女性利用不孕不育治疗的可能性比有保险的女性低 0.37 倍。

结论

人口统计学因素与不孕不育治疗的利用有关。保险状况是不孕女性是否接受治疗的重要预测因素。来自最近三次全国生育力调查的数据以及之前的分析表明,需要扩大保险覆盖范围,以解决利用服务的不孕女性与未利用服务的女性之间的社会经济差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the unevaluated: a secondary analysis of the National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) examining infertile women who did not access care.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1071-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02149-6. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
3
Sociodemographic differences in utilization of fertility services among reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer in the USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Apr;39(4):963-972. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02455-7. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Disparities in accessing infertility care in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-16.
Fertil Steril. 2019 Sep;112(3):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.044. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates.
Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.038.
7
Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States.
Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;100(4):1025-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.040. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
10
Quality of Health Insurance Coverage and Access to Care for Children in Low-Income Families.
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jan;170(1):43-51. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3028.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between a body shape index and female infertility: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03335-1.
2
Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.
Reprod Sci. 2023 Aug;30(8):2373-2396. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
3
Differences in Use of Fertility Treatment Between People With Medicaid and Private Health Insurance Coverage in the United States.
Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jul-Aug;33(4):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Infertility: still a largely uncovered and undertreated disease.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1069-1070. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02205-1. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Infertility Workup for the Women's Health Specialist: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 781.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;133(6):e377-e384. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003271.
2
Burden of care is the primary reason why insured women terminate in vitro fertilization treatment.
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1121-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.130.
3
Public Perception of Female Fertility: Initial Fertility, Peak Fertility, and Age-Related Infertility Among U.S. Adults.
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Jul;47(5):1507-1516. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1197-4. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
5
Quality of life and general health of infertile women.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jul 12;15(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0712-y.
6
Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):1023-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.101. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
7
How much is a child worth? Providers' and patients' views and responses concerning ethical and policy challenges in paying for ART.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171939. eCollection 2017.
8
A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z.
9
Women's involvement in clinical trials: historical perspective and future implications.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Jan-Mar;14(1):708. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.708. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
10
Access to and use of infertility services in the United States: framing the challenges.
Fertil Steril. 2016 May;105(5):1113-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验