NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1071-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02149-6. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
To characterize the demographic differences between infertile/sub-fertile women who utilized infertility services vs. those that do not.
A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data obtained during the 2011-2013, 2013-2015, and 2015-2017 cycles of National Survey for Family Growth from interviews administered in home for randomly selected participants by a National Center of Health Statistics (NCHS) surveyor was used to analyze married, divorced, or women with long-term partners who reported difficulty having biological children (sub-fertile/infertile women). Demographic differences such as formal marital status, education, race, and religion were compared between women who presented for infertility care vs. those that did not. The primary outcome measure was presenting for infertility evaluation and subsequently utilizing infertility services. Healthcare utilization trends such as having a usual place of care and insurance status were also included as exposures of interest in the analysis.
Of the 12,456 women included in the analysis 1770 (15.3%) had used infertility services and 1011 (8.3%) said it would be difficult for them to have a child but had not accessed infertility services. On univariate analysis, compared to women who used infertility services, untreated women had lower average household incomes (295.3 vs. 229.8% of the federal poverty line respectively). Untreated women also had lower levels of education and were more likely to be divorced or never have married. In terms of health status, unevaluated women were less likely to have a usual place for healthcare (87.3%) as compared to women presenting for fertility care (91.9%) (p = 0.004). When examining insurance status, 23.3% of unevaluated women were uninsured as compared to 8.3% of evaluated women. On multivariate analysis, infertile women without insurance were at 0.37 odds of utilizing infertility care compared to women with insurance.
Demographic factors are associated with the utilization of infertility care. Insurance status is a significant predictor of whether or not infertile women will access treatment. Data from the three most recent NSFG surveys along with prior analyses demonstrate the need for expanded insurance coverage in order to address the socioeconomic disparities between infertile women who are accessing services vs. those that are not.
描述利用不孕不育服务的不孕/低育女性与未利用该服务的女性之间的人口统计学差异。
对 2011-2013 年、2013-2015 年和 2015-2017 年全国生育力调查期间获得的横断面数据进行回顾性分析,这些数据来自全国卫生统计中心(NCHS)调查员对随机选择的参与者在家中进行的访谈。分析已婚、离婚或与长期伴侣报告生育生物学子女困难的女性(低育/不孕女性)。比较了接受不孕不育治疗的女性与未接受治疗的女性之间的人口统计学差异,如正式婚姻状况、教育程度、种族和宗教。主要结局指标是接受不孕不育评估并随后利用不孕不育服务。分析中还包括医疗保健利用趋势,如是否有常规医疗场所和保险状况。
在纳入分析的 12456 名女性中,有 1770 名(15.3%)使用了不孕不育服务,有 1011 名(8.3%)表示生育孩子困难,但未接受不孕不育服务。在单变量分析中,与使用不孕不育服务的女性相比,未治疗的女性平均家庭收入较低(分别为联邦贫困线的 295.3%和 229.8%)。未治疗的女性受教育程度也较低,更有可能离婚或从未结婚。在健康状况方面,未评估的女性拥有常规医疗场所的可能性低于接受生育力治疗的女性(分别为 87.3%和 91.9%)(p = 0.004)。在检查保险状况时,未评估的女性中有 23.3%未参保,而评估的女性中有 8.3%未参保。多变量分析显示,无保险的不孕女性利用不孕不育治疗的可能性比有保险的女性低 0.37 倍。
人口统计学因素与不孕不育治疗的利用有关。保险状况是不孕女性是否接受治疗的重要预测因素。来自最近三次全国生育力调查的数据以及之前的分析表明,需要扩大保险覆盖范围,以解决利用服务的不孕女性与未利用服务的女性之间的社会经济差异。