• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Strategy Adjustments of the United States and the European Union vis-à-vis China: Democratic Global Power Identities and Fluid Polygonal Relations.美国和欧盟对华战略调整:民主全球权力身份与流动多边关系
J Chin Polit Sci. 2022;27(3):519-541. doi: 10.1007/s11366-022-09794-3. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
US Strategy in a Changing World Order: Challenges for Russia.变化的世界秩序中的美国战略:对俄罗斯的挑战
Her Russ Acad Sci. 2021;91(4):393-402. doi: 10.1134/S1019331621040080. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
3
The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision?欧盟及其成员国的全球卫生政策:共同愿景?
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 May 1;7(5):433-442. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.112.
4
The implementation of the Strategy Europe 2020 objectives in European Union countries: the concept analysis and statistical evaluation.欧盟国家对《欧洲2020战略》目标的实施:概念分析与统计评估
Qual Quant. 2018;52(1):119-133. doi: 10.1007/s11135-016-0454-7. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
The Illusion of the China-US-Europe Strategic Triangle: Reactions from Germany and the UK.中美欧战略三角的幻象:来自德国和英国的反应
J Chin Polit Sci. 2022;27(3):493-518. doi: 10.1007/s11366-021-09771-2. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
Relations between the EU, Turkey, and Japan: dissonances in the strategic triangle.欧盟、土耳其和日本之间的关系:战略三角中的不和谐。
F1000Res. 2021 Mar 2;10:171. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51085.1. eCollection 2021.
7
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
8
Strategic dilemmas of biosecurity in the European Union.欧盟生物安全的战略困境
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(1):17-23. doi: 10.1089/153871304322964309.
9
The Belt-and-Road Initiative as a paradigm change for European Union-China security cooperation? The case of Central Asia.
Asia Eur J. 2021;19(3):391-409. doi: 10.1007/s10308-021-00606-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
10
Scientific collaboration between 'old' and 'new' member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?“老”成员国与“新”成员国之间的科学合作:加入欧盟有影响吗?
Scientometrics. 2016;106:1193-1215. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1824-y. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

美国和欧盟对华战略调整:民主全球权力身份与流动多边关系

Strategy Adjustments of the United States and the European Union vis-à-vis China: Democratic Global Power Identities and Fluid Polygonal Relations.

作者信息

Noesselt Nele

机构信息

Institute of Political Science & IN-EAST, University of Duisburg-Essen, Forsthausweg 2 (room LE709b), D-47057 Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Chin Polit Sci. 2022;27(3):519-541. doi: 10.1007/s11366-022-09794-3. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11366-022-09794-3
PMID:35317409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931582/
Abstract

How are the European Union and its individual member states positioning themselves within the intensifying trade war and power struggles between Washington and Beijing? Does the fact that both the United States and the EU have recently updated their strategic approach to China and continuously underline their democratic regime patterns and support for like-minded systems-contrasted with Beijing as a perceived promoter of an illiberal world order-imply a return of "Cold War" system antagonism? Could this also result in a reemergence of strategic triangles? Shedding light on Washington's expression of active support for Taiwan (and Hong Kong) and EUrope's related position statements, this article concludes that these emerging constellations would best be described as strategic polygonal relationships. While the EU Commission seeks to formulate a common foreign and security strategy, the various EU member states are defining their distinct positions within the new global power matrix emerging between Washington and Beijing.

摘要

欧盟及其各个成员国在华盛顿和北京之间愈演愈烈的贸易战和权力斗争中如何定位自己?美国和欧盟最近都更新了对华战略方针,并不断强调其民主政体模式以及对志同道合体系的支持(与被视为非自由世界秩序推动者的北京形成对比),这是否意味着“冷战”体系对抗的回归?这是否还会导致战略三角的重新出现?通过剖析华盛顿对台湾(以及香港)的积极支持表态和欧洲的相关立场声明,本文得出结论,这些新出现的格局最好被描述为战略多边关系。尽管欧盟委员会试图制定共同的外交和安全战略,但欧盟各成员国正在华盛顿和北京之间新出现的全球权力矩阵中确定各自不同的立场。