Noesselt Nele
Institute of Political Science & IN-EAST, University of Duisburg-Essen, Forsthausweg 2 (room LE709b), D-47057 Duisburg, Germany.
J Chin Polit Sci. 2022;27(3):519-541. doi: 10.1007/s11366-022-09794-3. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
How are the European Union and its individual member states positioning themselves within the intensifying trade war and power struggles between Washington and Beijing? Does the fact that both the United States and the EU have recently updated their strategic approach to China and continuously underline their democratic regime patterns and support for like-minded systems-contrasted with Beijing as a perceived promoter of an illiberal world order-imply a return of "Cold War" system antagonism? Could this also result in a reemergence of strategic triangles? Shedding light on Washington's expression of active support for Taiwan (and Hong Kong) and EUrope's related position statements, this article concludes that these emerging constellations would best be described as strategic polygonal relationships. While the EU Commission seeks to formulate a common foreign and security strategy, the various EU member states are defining their distinct positions within the new global power matrix emerging between Washington and Beijing.
欧盟及其各个成员国在华盛顿和北京之间愈演愈烈的贸易战和权力斗争中如何定位自己?美国和欧盟最近都更新了对华战略方针,并不断强调其民主政体模式以及对志同道合体系的支持(与被视为非自由世界秩序推动者的北京形成对比),这是否意味着“冷战”体系对抗的回归?这是否还会导致战略三角的重新出现?通过剖析华盛顿对台湾(以及香港)的积极支持表态和欧洲的相关立场声明,本文得出结论,这些新出现的格局最好被描述为战略多边关系。尽管欧盟委员会试图制定共同的外交和安全战略,但欧盟各成员国正在华盛顿和北京之间新出现的全球权力矩阵中确定各自不同的立场。