• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于护士视角的医院电子病历扩展信息成功系统模型(ISSM)的构建:综合框架与问卷研究。

Development an extended-information success system model (ISSM) based on nurses' point of view for hospital EHRs: a combined framework and questionnaire.

机构信息

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01800-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01800-1
PMID:35317784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8939199/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the hospital EHR success rate has great benefits for hospitals. The present study aimed to 1-Propose an extended-ISSM framework and a questionnaire in a systematic manner for EHR evaluation based on nurses' perspectives, 2-Determine the EHR success rate, and 3-Explore the effective factors contributing to EHR success.

METHODS

The proposed framework was developed using ISSM, TAM3, TTF, HOT-FIT, and literature review in seven steps. A self-administrated structured 65-items questionnaire was developed with CVI: 90.27% and CVR: 94.34%. Construct validity was conducted using EFA and CFA. Eleven factors were identified, collectively accounting for 71.4% of the total variance. In the EFA step, 15 questions and two questions in EFA were excluded. Finally, 48 items remained in the framework including dimensions of technology, human, organization, ease of use, usefulness, and net benefits. The overall Cronbach's alpha value was 93.4%. In addition, the hospital EHR success rate was determined and categorized. In addition, effective factors on EHR success were explored.

RESULTS

In total, 86 nurses participated in the study. On average, the "total hospital EHR success rate" was moderate. The total EHR success rates was ranging from 47.09 to 74.96%. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was a significant relationship between "gender" and "self-efficacy" (p-value: 0.042). A reverse relation between "years of experience using computers" and "training" (p-value: 0.012) was observed. "Years of experience using EHR" as well as "education level" (p-value: 0.001) and "ease of use" had a reverse relationship (p-value: 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the EHR success based on nurses' viewpoint in a developing country. Our results provide an instrument for comparison of EHR success rates in various hospitals.

摘要

背景

了解医院电子健康记录(EHR)的成功率对医院有很大的好处。本研究旨在:1. 系统地提出一个扩展的信息系统成功模型(ISSM)框架和问卷,用于基于护士视角的 EHR 评估;2. 确定 EHR 的成功率;3. 探索有助于 EHR 成功的有效因素。

方法

该框架是使用 ISSM、TAM3、TTF、HOT-FIT 和文献综述,通过七个步骤开发的。开发了一份自我管理的结构化 65 项问卷,内容效度指数(CVI)为 90.27%,内容效度比(CVR)为 94.34%。使用 EFA 和 CFA 进行结构有效性验证。确定了 11 个因素,共同解释了总方差的 71.4%。在 EFA 步骤中,排除了 15 个问题和 EFA 中的 2 个问题。最后,框架中包含了 48 个项目,涵盖了技术、人员、组织、易用性、有用性和净收益等维度。总体 Cronbach's alpha 值为 93.4%。此外,还确定了医院 EHR 的成功率并进行了分类。此外,还探讨了影响 EHR 成功的有效因素。

结果

共有 86 名护士参与了研究。平均而言,“医院整体 EHR 成功率”处于中等水平。EHR 总成功率在 47.09%至 74.96%之间。Kruskal-Wallis 检验的结果表明,“性别”和“自我效能感”之间存在显著关系(p 值:0.042)。“使用计算机的年限”和“培训”之间呈负相关(p 值:0.012)。“使用 EHR 的年限”以及“教育水平”(p 值:0.001)和“易用性”之间呈负相关(p 值:0.034)。

结论

本研究结果强调了发展中国家基于护士视角的 EHR 成功。我们的研究结果为比较不同医院的 EHR 成功率提供了一个工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f46/8939199/7cb2b93722aa/12911_2022_1800_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f46/8939199/b66d88b99a70/12911_2022_1800_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f46/8939199/7cb2b93722aa/12911_2022_1800_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f46/8939199/b66d88b99a70/12911_2022_1800_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f46/8939199/7cb2b93722aa/12911_2022_1800_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development an extended-information success system model (ISSM) based on nurses' point of view for hospital EHRs: a combined framework and questionnaire.基于护士视角的医院电子病历扩展信息成功系统模型(ISSM)的构建:综合框架与问卷研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01800-1.
2
Investigation the success rate of hospital information system (HIS): Development of a questionnaire and case study.医院信息系统(HIS)成功率调查:问卷编制与案例研究
J Healthc Qual Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2020.03.010. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
3
Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study.确定医院信息系统(HIS)的成功率:一种新工具的开发及案例研究。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 May 14;7(9):1407-1414. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.294. eCollection 2019 May 15.
4
Not another box to check! Using the UTAUT to explore nurses' psychological adaptation to electronic health record usability.又要打勾填表!运用统一接受和使用技术模型探讨护士对电子健康记录可用性的心理适应情况。
Nurs Forum. 2022 May;57(3):412-420. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12686. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
5
Factors associated with nurses' user resistance to change of electronic health record systems.与护士对电子健康记录系统变革的用户抵制相关的因素。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jul 17;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01581-z.
6
Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.医生和护士在电子健康记录可用性方面的体验:按就业部门和系统品牌划分的专业群体之间的比较。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Feb;134:104018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104018. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
7
Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.基于DeLone和McLean信息系统成功模型对综合电子健康记录系统的评估:方法、结果及成功因素
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Oct;82(10):940-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
8
Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of electronic health records among nurses: Application of Technology Acceptance Model.护士对电子健康记录的感知有用性和感知易用性:技术接受模型的应用
Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Dec;43(4):379-389. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1363761. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Electronic Health Record Implementations and Insufficient Training Endanger Nurses' Well-being: Cross-sectional Survey Study.电子健康记录的实施和培训不足危及护士的福祉:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e27096. doi: 10.2196/27096.
10
Clinicians' Attitudes Toward Electronic Health Records in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯临床医生对电子健康记录的态度
Cureus. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):e56281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56281. eCollection 2024 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to the implementation of large-scale electronic health record systems in primary healthcare centers: a mixed-methods study in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯初级医疗保健中心大规模电子健康记录系统实施的障碍:一项混合方法研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 15;12:1516714. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1516714. eCollection 2025.
2
A Data-Driven Paradigm for a Resilient and Sustainable Integrated Health Information Systems for Health Care Applications.一种用于医疗保健应用的具有弹性和可持续性的综合健康信息系统的数据驱动范式。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 12;16:4015-4025. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S433299. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship between Nurses' Training and Perceptions of Electronic Documentation Systems.护士培训与电子文档系统认知之间的关系
Nurs Rep. 2021 Jan 1;11(1):12-27. doi: 10.3390/nursrep11010002.
2
Sixteen years of eHealth experiences in Iran: a qualitative content analysis of national policies.十六年来伊朗的电子健康经验:国家政策的定性内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00795-x.
3
Evaluation frameworks for digital nursing technologies: analysis, assessment, and guidance. An overview of the literature.
数字护理技术评估框架:分析、评估与指导。文献综述
BMC Nurs. 2021 Aug 17;20(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00654-8.
4
Understanding the Association Between Electronic Health Record Satisfaction and the Well-Being of Nurses: Survey Study.了解电子健康记录满意度与护士幸福感之间的关联:调查研究
JMIR Nurs. 2020 Jun 23;3(1):e13996. doi: 10.2196/13996. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Investigation the success rate of hospital information system (HIS): Development of a questionnaire and case study.医院信息系统(HIS)成功率调查:问卷编制与案例研究
J Healthc Qual Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2020.03.010. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
6
Nurses' Attitudes Toward the Use of an Electronic Health Information System in a Developing Country.发展中国家护士对使用电子健康信息系统的态度。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 Apr 18;5:2377960819843711. doi: 10.1177/2377960819843711. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
7
Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.电子健康记录实施的效果以及采用和使用的障碍:一项范围综述和内容定性分析
Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 4;10(12):327. doi: 10.3390/life10120327.
8
The Associations of Electronic Health Record Usability and User Age With Stress and Cognitive Failures Among Finnish Registered Nurses: Cross-Sectional Study.芬兰注册护士中电子健康记录可用性、用户年龄与压力及认知失误的关联:横断面研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Nov 18;8(11):e23623. doi: 10.2196/23623.
9
Getting Value From Electronic Health Records: Research Needed to Improve Practice.从电子健康记录中获取价值:需要研究以改善实践。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S130-S136. doi: 10.7326/M19-0878.
10
Development and validation of knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire for prevention of respiratory tract infections among Malaysian Hajj pilgrims.马来西亚朝觐者预防呼吸道感染知识、态度和实践问卷的制定和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8269-9.