Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
Anaesthesia Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
Respir Care. 2022 Jun;67(6):638-646. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09527. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 60-80% of patients admitted to ICU require mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress. We aimed to compare the frequency of postextubation stridor (PES) and to explore risk factors in COVID-19 subjects compared to those without COVID-19.
We performed an observational retrospective study on subjects admitted for severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation > 48 h during the first and second waves in 2020 and compared these subjects to historical controls without COVID-19 who received mechanical ventilation > 48 h between 2016-2019. The primary outcome was the frequency of PES, defined as audible stridor within 2 h following extubation.
Of the 134 subjects admitted with severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation, 96 were extubated and included and compared to 211 controls. The frequency of PES was 22.9% in the COVID-19 subjects and 3.8% in the controls < .001). Factors independently associated with PES were having COVID-19 (odds ratio 3.72, [95% CI 1.24-12.14], = .02), female sex (odds ratio 5.77 [95% CI 2.30-15.64], < .001), and tube mobilization or re-intubation or prone positioning (odds ratio 3.01 [95% CI 1.04-9.44], = .047) after adjustment on Simplified Acute Physiology Score II expanded). During the first wave, PES was significantly more common in subjects with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test on tracheal samples on the day of extubation (73.3% vs 24.3%, = .018).
PES affected nearly one-quarter of subjects with COVID-19, a proportion significantly higher than that seen in controls. Independent risk factors for PES were COVID-19, female sex, and tube mobilization or re-intubation or prone positioning. PES was associated with persistent viral shedding at the time of extubation.
在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,60-80%入住 ICU 的患者因呼吸窘迫需要机械通气。我们旨在比较 COVID-19 患者与无 COVID-19 的患者拔管后喘鸣(PES)的发生率,并探讨其危险因素。
我们对 2020 年第一波和第二波期间因严重 COVID-19 需机械通气>48 小时而入院的患者进行了一项观察性回顾性研究,并将这些患者与 2016-2019 年期间因机械通气>48 小时的无 COVID-19 的历史对照进行了比较。主要结局是 PES 的发生率,定义为拔管后 2 小时内可闻及喘鸣。
在 134 例因严重 COVID-19 需机械通气而入院的患者中,96 例被拔管并纳入研究,并与 211 例对照进行了比较。COVID-19 患者中 PES 的发生率为 22.9%,而对照组为 3.8% <.001)。与 PES 独立相关的因素是 COVID-19(优势比 3.72 [95%可信区间 1.24-12.14], =.02)、女性(优势比 5.77 [95%可信区间 2.30-15.64], <.001)和机械通气导管移动、重新插管或俯卧位(优势比 3.01 [95%可信区间 1.04-9.44], =.047),在调整简化急性生理学评分 II 扩展版后。在第一波中,拔管当天气管样本 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测阳性的患者 PES 发生率显著高于对照组(73.3% vs 24.3%, =.018)。
近四分之一的 COVID-19 患者发生 PES,其发生率明显高于对照组。PES 的独立危险因素是 COVID-19、女性和机械通气导管移动、重新插管或俯卧位。PES 与拔管时持续病毒脱落有关。