Berner Y, Fink A, Shani A, Weisman Z, Eliraz A, Bruderman I, Bentwich Z
Oncology. 1986;43(5):327-34. doi: 10.1159/000226393.
We have tested by the computerized tube leukocyte adherence inhibition (LAI) assay, 319, 100 and 342 patients and controls for the presence of antitumor immunity to colorectal, breast and lung cancers. The assay was standardized and its sensitivity increased by using, as a challenging antigen, spent medium of human carcinoma cell lines and by the addition of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). By large, the sensitivity of the assay (after the addition of PGE2) was inversely related to tumor burden, namely, it was 82.7, 78.9, and 88.6% as compared to 57.1, 33.3, and 29.6% for the early and late stages of colorectal, breast and lung cancers, respectively. Calculating the frequency of disease in the population studied and in comparison with known frequencies of the same in the general population, the positive and negative predicting values (PVpos, PVneg) were obtained. Our results demonstrate that the LAI assay cannot be applied for mass screening since its low PVpos would impair its effectiveness. However, its application to a population at high risk for developing a particular malignancy or as a second-line modality to more conventional screening methods would increase its cost-effectiveness and favor its applicability.
我们通过计算机化的试管白细胞黏附抑制(LAI)试验,检测了319名、100名和342名结直肠癌、乳腺癌和肺癌患者及对照者是否存在抗肿瘤免疫力。该试验进行了标准化,通过使用人癌细胞系的废弃培养基作为激发抗原,并添加前列腺素E2(PGE2),提高了其敏感性。总体而言,该试验(添加PGE2后)的敏感性与肿瘤负荷呈负相关,即结直肠癌、乳腺癌和肺癌早期和晚期的敏感性分别为82.7%、78.9%和88.6%,而早期和晚期分别为57.1%、33.3%和29.6%。通过计算所研究人群中的疾病发生率,并与一般人群中相同疾病的已知发生率进行比较,得出了阳性和阴性预测值(PVpos、PVneg)。我们的结果表明,LAI试验不能用于大规模筛查,因为其低PVpos会损害其有效性。然而,将其应用于有发生特定恶性肿瘤高风险的人群,或作为更传统筛查方法的二线手段,将提高其成本效益并有利于其应用。