• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有和没有跌倒史的老年人的计时起立行走测试值

[Timed up and go values in older people with and without a history of falls].

作者信息

Ugarte Ll Jorge, Vargas R Felipe

机构信息

Escuela de Kinesiología, Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Rev Med Chil. 2021 Sep;149(9):1302-1310. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872021000901302.

DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872021000901302
PMID:35319683
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timed Up and Go (TUG) is used to assess the risk of falling of older people.

AIM

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of TUG as a predictor of falls in older adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TUG was measured in 148 independent community-dwelling older adults aged 75 ± 7 years (85% women). Of these, 58 reported having a fall in the previous year. Analysis of the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of common cut-off times used in clinical practice. The times required to perform the TUG as quickly as possible (best fitted time) and at the usual pace (common time) were registered.

RESULTS

Participants with a history of falls had higher TUG times than their counterparts who did not fall (10.9 ± 3.9 and 9.2 ± 2.6 s, respectively). By age groups, only in the 60-69 age group the differences between those who fell and those who did not, were statistically significant (p < 0.05). A cut-off of 9s generates the better sensitivity and specificity for the test (0.60 and 0.57, respectively). For 60-69 age group the best cut-off time is 8.2s, with an increase in sensitivity and specificity to 0.73 and 0.68, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in TUG values between participants with and without a history of falls. Determining TUG cut-off values by age groups improves the sensitivity and specificity of the test, especially in the 60-69 age range.

摘要

背景

定时起立行走测试(TUG)用于评估老年人跌倒风险。

目的

评估TUG作为老年人跌倒预测指标的敏感性和特异性。

材料与方法

对148名年龄在75±7岁的独立居住在社区的老年人(85%为女性)进行TUG测试。其中,58人报告上一年有过跌倒。通过分析ROC(受试者工作特征)曲线来评估临床实践中常用截断时间的敏感性和特异性。记录了尽可能快地完成TUG的时间(最佳拟合时间)和以平常速度完成的时间(常规时间)。

结果

有跌倒史的参与者的TUG时间高于无跌倒史的参与者(分别为10.9±3.9秒和9.2±2.6秒)。按年龄组划分,仅在60 - 69岁年龄组中,跌倒者与未跌倒者之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。截断值为9秒时,测试的敏感性和特异性较好(分别为0.60和0.57)。对于60 - 69岁年龄组,最佳截断时间为8.2秒,敏感性和特异性分别提高到0.73和0.68。

结论

有跌倒史和无跌倒史的参与者之间TUG值存在差异。按年龄组确定TUG截断值可提高测试的敏感性和特异性,尤其是在60 - 69岁年龄范围内。

相似文献

1
[Timed up and go values in older people with and without a history of falls].有和没有跌倒史的老年人的计时起立行走测试值
Rev Med Chil. 2021 Sep;149(9):1302-1310. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872021000901302.
2
Does the timed up and go test predict future falls among British community-dwelling older people? Prospective cohort study nested within a randomised controlled trial.定时起立行走测试能否预测英国社区老年人未来的跌倒情况?一项嵌套于随机对照试验中的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Apr 3;15:38. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0039-7.
3
The 3-m Backwards Walk and Retrospective Falls: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Clinical Measure.3 米后退行走和回溯性跌倒:一种新的临床测量方法的诊断准确性。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Oct/Dec;42(4):249-255. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000149.
4
Dual tasking with the timed "up & go" test improves detection of risk of falls in people with Parkinson disease.在帕金森病患者中,将定时“起立行走”测试与双重任务相结合可提高对跌倒风险的检测。
Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;95(1):95-102. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130386. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
Association of fall history with the Timed Up and Go test score and the dual task cost: A cross-sectional study among independent community-dwelling older adults.跌倒史与计时起立行走测试评分和双重任务成本的关联:一项独立社区居住的老年人的横断面研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Aug;18(8):1189-1193. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13439. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
A comparison of different balance tests in the prediction of falls in older women with vertebral fractures: a cohort study.不同平衡测试对老年椎体骨折女性跌倒预测能力的比较:一项队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2007 Jan;36(1):78-83. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl147. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
7
Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test.使用计时起立行走测试预测社区居住老年人跌倒的概率。
Phys Ther. 2000 Sep;80(9):896-903.
8
The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) Demonstrates Higher Accuracy in Identifying Older Adult Participants With History of Falls Than Do the BESTest, Berg Balance Scale, or Timed Up and Go Test.迷你平衡评估系统测试(Mini-BESTest)在识别有跌倒史的老年参与者方面比BESTest、伯格平衡量表或计时起立行走测试具有更高的准确性。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Apr-Jun;39(2):64-70. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000050.
9
Prognostic validity of the Timed Up-and-Go test, a modified Get-Up-and-Go test, staff's global judgement and fall history in evaluating fall risk in residential care facilities.改良起立行走测试(定时起立行走测试)、工作人员的整体判断以及跌倒史在评估养老机构跌倒风险中的预后效度。
Age Ageing. 2008 Jul;37(4):442-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn101. Epub 2008 May 30.
10
Does dual-tasking provide additional value in timed "up and go" test for predicting the occurrence of falls? A longitudinal observation study by age group (young-older or old-older adults).双重任务测试在计时“起立行走”测试中预测跌倒发生方面是否提供额外价值?按年龄组(年轻老年人或年老老年人)进行的纵向观察研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jan;33(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01510-6. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Square Stepping Exercise on Physical, Cognitive and Psychosocial Fitness in People with Parkinson's Disease.方形踏步运动对帕金森病患者身体、认知和心理社会健康的影响。
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10197-9.
2
Biomechanical characteristics of high- and low-frequency trunk acceleration upon gait initiation related to balance ability in community-dwelling elderly people: a cross-sectional study.社区居住老年人步态起始时高低频躯干加速度的生物力学特征与平衡能力的关系:一项横断面研究
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2025 May;87(2):329-338. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.87.2.329.
3
Prevention and Mitigation of Frailty Syndrome in Institutionalised Older Adults Through Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.
通过体育活动预防和减轻机构养老老年人的衰弱综合征:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 30;13(3):276. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030276.
4
Protein Intake and Physical Activity Levels as Determinants of Sarcopenia Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.蛋白质摄入和身体活动水平是社区居住老年人肌少症风险的决定因素。
Nutrients. 2024 May 2;16(9):1380. doi: 10.3390/nu16091380.
5
Assessing Nutritional Status and Frailty among Poor Elderly Individuals in Requena del Tapiche, Peru.评估秘鲁雷奎纳德尔塔皮切贫困老年人的营养状况和虚弱程度。
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 2;15(17):3840. doi: 10.3390/nu15173840.
6
How Well Do Low Population-Specific Values for Muscle Parameters Associate with Indices of Poor Physical Health? Cross-Sectional Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.低人群特异性肌肉参数值与身体健康不佳指标的关联程度如何?来自吉朗骨质疏松症研究的横断面数据。
J Clin Med. 2022 May 20;11(10):2906. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102906.