N.F. Sánchez is associate professor, Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4641-3041 .
L. Kennedy is senior director, Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, Arizona.
Acad Med. 2022 Nov 1;97(11):1597-1604. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004672. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
The Supreme Court's 2020 ruling prohibiting workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity ( Bostock v Clayton County ) offers new legal protections for LGBTQ+ employees and allies and new opportunities for academic medicine to advance LGBTQ+ inclusion at their institutions. In this perspective piece, the authors examine the history of LGBTQ+ community recognition, tolerance, protections, and ongoing inclusion and the advocacy efforts led by LGBTQ+ patients, community activists, and medical colleagues. They also examine the current limitations of the court's ruling and recommend future actions to advance workplace and health equity. While recent advancements in equality have not erased chronic barriers to inclusion and advancement, they can pave the way for leaders in research, education, and clinical care to shape national health guidelines and policies that impact the health of all Americans.
最高法院 2020 年关于禁止基于性取向或性别认同的工作场所歧视的裁决(Bostock v Clayton County)为 LGBTQ+ 员工及其盟友提供了新的法律保护,并为学术医学机构推进 LGBTQ+包容提供了新的机会。在这篇观点文章中,作者审视了 LGBTQ+群体的认可、宽容、保护以及持续包容的历史,以及由 LGBTQ+患者、社区活动家和医学同事领导的倡导努力。他们还审视了法院裁决的当前局限性,并建议采取未来行动来推进工作场所和健康公平。虽然最近在平等方面取得的进展并没有消除包容和进步的长期障碍,但它们可以为研究、教育和临床护理领域的领导者铺平道路,以制定影响所有美国人健康的国家卫生指南和政策。