• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)与经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查结果的比较:一项回顾性二次数据分析。

Comparison of MRCP and ERCP findings: A retrospective secondary data analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Teaching Institute, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Feb;72(2):284-286. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.20-721.

DOI:10.47391/JPMA.20-721
PMID:35320178
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the findings of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients presenting with bile duct disorders.

METHODS

The retrospective secondary-data study was conducted at the Gastroenterology Department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, and comprised data of patients who presented with bile duct disorders from June2019 to May2020. Data was analysed using SPSS 25.

RESULTS

Of the 92 patients, 41(44.6%) were males and 51(55.4%) were females. The overall mean age was 50.12 ± 16.7 years (range: 13-80 years). Out of 28 bile duct calculi cases detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, 25(89.3%) were detected by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and, of the 64 without calculi, it was 50(78.1%). Out of 8 bile duct strictures detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, 3(37.5%) were correctly diagnosed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and, of the 84 unaffected patients, were excluded 79(94%). Out of 64 bile duct dilatation cases, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography correctly diagnosed 59(92.2%), and, of the 28 unaffected patients, it excluded 27(96.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

For bile duct stone and dilation, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was found to have high diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

目的

比较磁共振胰胆管成像和内镜逆行胰胆管造影在胆管疾病患者中的发现。

方法

本回顾性二次数据分析研究在巴基斯坦白沙瓦 Lady Reading 医院的胃肠病学部进行,纳入了 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 5 月期间因胆管疾病就诊的患者数据。使用 SPSS 25 对数据进行分析。

结果

92 例患者中,41 例(44.6%)为男性,51 例(55.4%)为女性。总体平均年龄为 50.12±16.7 岁(范围:13-80 岁)。在 28 例经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术检测到的胆管结石病例中,25 例(89.3%)被磁共振胰胆管成像术检测到,而在 64 例无结石的病例中,50 例(78.1%)被检测到。在 8 例经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术检测到的胆管狭窄病例中,3 例(37.5%)被磁共振胰胆管成像术正确诊断,而在 84 例未受影响的患者中,有 79 例(94%)被排除在外。在 64 例胆管扩张病例中,磁共振胰胆管成像术正确诊断了 59 例(92.2%),而在 28 例未受影响的患者中,有 27 例(96.4%)被排除在外。

结论

对于胆管结石和扩张,磁共振胰胆管成像术具有较高的诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of MRCP and ERCP findings: A retrospective secondary data analysis.磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)与经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查结果的比较:一项回顾性二次数据分析。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Feb;72(2):284-286. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.20-721.
2
Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.磁共振胰胆管造影在临床实践中的应用:不如我们曾经认为的那么好。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.060. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
3
The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.磁共振胰胆管造影术和超声检查与直接胆管造影术在检测胆总管结石方面的诊断准确性比较。
Clin Radiol. 1999 Sep;54(9):604-14. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)90023-5.
4
[Comparative study of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in common duct stones].[超声检查、磁共振胰胆管造影和内镜逆行胰胆管造影在胆总管结石中的对比研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Oct 1;46(19):1465-7.
5
[Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].[磁共振胰胆管造影术诊断胆总管结石的准确性]
Rev Med Chil. 2008 May;136(5):600-5. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
6
Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.磁共振胰胆管成像对急性胆源性胰腺炎胆管结石的诊断价值。
Pancreatology. 2018 Jan;18(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
7
Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)在儿科人群中的诊断性能:一项临床效果研究。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jul;44(7):2377-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01975-8.
8
MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.磁共振胰胆管造影:屏气二维投影技术与诊断性内镜逆行胰胆管造影的前瞻性比较。
Eur Radiol. 1999;9(7):1411-7. doi: 10.1007/s003300050859.
9
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.内镜逆行胰胆管造影、胆管内超声检查及磁共振胰胆管造影在胆管狭窄中的应用:影像学诊断与组织病理学相关性的前瞻性比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30347.x.
10
Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?更好的非侵入性内镜检查方法:内镜超声还是磁共振胰胆管造影?
Med Glas (Zenica). 2019 Feb 1;16(1):40-44. doi: 10.17392/955-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of DynaCT biliary soft tissue reconstruction technology in diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis.动态容积CT胆道软组织重建技术在肝内胆管结石诊治中的应用
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):98283. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98283.
2
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not necessary in all patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram.对于所有术中胆管造影异常的患者,内镜逆行胰胆管造影并非都有必要进行。
JGH Open. 2023 Oct 25;7(11):797-799. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12984. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of common bile duct and pancreatic duct pathologies.
磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)在评估胆总管和胰管病变中的比较。
Front Med Technol. 2023 Jul 12;5:946555. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.946555. eCollection 2023.