• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗微生物药物管理前瞻性审核和反馈对 COVID-19 住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项实用临床试验方案。

Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial stewardship prospective audit and feedback in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Women and Children's Health Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265493. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265493
PMID:35320289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8942275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is widespread in patients with COVID-19 despite a low prevalence of bacterial co-infection, raising concerns for the accelerated development of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is vital but there are limited randomized clinical trial data supporting AMS interventions such as prospective audit and feedback (PAF). High quality data to demonstrate safety and efficacy of AMS PAF in hospitalized COVID-19 patients are needed.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This is a prospective, multi-center, non-inferiority, pragmatic randomized clinical trial evaluating AMS PAF intervention plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone. We include patients with microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring hospital admission for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Eligible ward beds and critical care unit beds will be randomized prior to study commencement at each participating site by computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by intensive care unit versus conventional ward in a 1:1 fashion. PAF intervention consists of real time review of antibacterial prescriptions and immediate written and verbal feedback to attending teams, performed by site-based AMS teams comprised of an AMS pharmacist and physician. The primary outcome is clinical status at post-admission day 15 measured using a 7-point ordinal scale. Patients will be followed for secondary outcomes out to 30 days. A total of 530 patients are needed to show a statistically significant non-inferiority, with 80% power and 2.5% one-sided alpha assuming standard deviation of 2 and the non-inferiority margin of 0.5.

DISCUSSION

This study protocol presents a pragmatic clinical trial design with small unit cluster randomization for AMS intervention in hospitalized COVID-19 that will provide high-level evidence and may be adopted in other clinical situations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is being performed at the University of Alberta and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04896866) on May 17, 2021.

摘要

背景

尽管 COVID-19 患者中细菌合并感染的发生率较低,但广谱抗生素的使用仍很广泛,这引发了人们对加速出现抗菌药物耐药性的担忧。抗菌药物管理(AMS)至关重要,但支持 AMS 干预措施(如前瞻性审核和反馈(PAF))的随机临床试验数据有限。需要高质量的数据来证明在住院 COVID-19 患者中实施 AMS PAF 的安全性和有效性。

方法和设计

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、非劣效性、实用随机临床试验,评估 AMS PAF 干预加标准治疗(SOC)与 SOC 单独治疗的效果。我们纳入因严重 COVID-19 肺炎需要住院治疗的微生物学确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者。在每个参与地点,在研究开始前,将根据 ICU 与普通病房进行分层的计算机生成分配序列对符合条件的病房床位和重症监护病房床位进行随机分组,比例为 1:1。PAF 干预包括实时审核抗菌药物处方,并立即向主治团队提供书面和口头反馈,由基于现场的 AMS 团队进行,该团队由 AMS 药剂师和医生组成。主要结局是通过 7 分序数量表在入院后第 15 天测量的临床状态。将对患者进行次要结局随访至 30 天。假设标准偏差为 2,非劣效性边界为 0.5,需要 530 名患者才能显示出具有统计学意义的非劣效性,效能为 80%,单侧α值为 2.5%。

讨论

本研究方案提出了一种实用的临床研究设计,采用小单位集群随机化方法对住院 COVID-19 患者进行 AMS 干预,将提供高级别的证据,并可能在其他临床情况下采用。

试验注册

该研究正在阿尔伯塔大学进行,于 2021 年 5 月 17 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT04896866)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e3/8942275/974e5491b670/pone.0265493.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e3/8942275/974e5491b670/pone.0265493.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e3/8942275/974e5491b670/pone.0265493.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial stewardship prospective audit and feedback in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial.抗微生物药物管理前瞻性审核和反馈对 COVID-19 住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项实用临床试验方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265493. eCollection 2022.
2
Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial stewardship prospective audit and feedback in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (COVASP): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial.抗菌药物管理前瞻性审核和反馈对 COVID-19 住院患者的疗效和安全性(COVASP):一项实用的、基于群组的、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jun;23(6):673-682. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00832-5. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
4
Norwegian Coronavirus Disease 2019 (NO COVID-19) Pragmatic Open label Study to assess early use of hydroxychloroquine sulphate in moderately severe hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.挪威 2019 年冠状病毒病(NO COVID-19)实用开放性标签研究,评估硫酸羟氯喹在 2019 年冠状病毒病中度重症住院患者中的早期使用:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04420-0.
5
Coagulopathy of hospitalised COVID-19: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Anticoagulation versus Standard Care as a Rapid Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (RAPID COVID COAG - RAPID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.住院 COVID-19 患者的凝血病:治疗性抗凝与标准治疗作为对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应的实用随机对照试验 (RAPID COVID COAG - RAPID 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05076-0.
6
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of human anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma in severely ill adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估人抗 SARS-CoV-2 恢复期血浆在 COVID-19 重症成人中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04422-y.
7
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
8
Randomized clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma use among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (PERUCONPLASMA): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.随机临床试验评估 COVID-19 住院患者使用恢复期血浆的安全性和疗效(PERUCONPLASMA):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 May 17;22(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05189-6.
9
Half of Prescribed Antibiotics Are Not Needed: A Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention and Clinical Outcomes in a Referral Hospital in Ethiopia.半数处方抗生素并不必要:埃塞俄比亚一家转诊医院中由药剂师主导的抗菌药物管理干预措施及临床结果
Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 9;8:109. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00109. eCollection 2020.
10
Study protocol for a multicentre, cluster randomised, superiority trial evaluating the impact of computerised decision support, audit and feedback on antibiotic use: the COMPuterized Antibiotic Stewardship Study (COMPASS).一项多中心、整群随机、优效性试验的研究方案,评估计算机化决策支持、审核与反馈对抗生素使用的影响:计算机化抗生素管理研究(COMPASS)
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 27;8(6):e022666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022666.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Adherence With In-Patient Prospective Audit and Feedback Recommendations on Patient and Economic Outcomes.住院前瞻性审核与反馈建议的依从性对患者及经济结局的影响
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2025 Feb 10;10(1):32-39. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2023-0041. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial stewardship prospective audit and feedback in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (COVASP): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial.抗菌药物管理前瞻性审核和反馈对 COVID-19 住院患者的疗效和安全性(COVASP):一项实用的、基于群组的、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jun;23(6):673-682. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00832-5. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19.治疗 COVID-19 的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 22;10(10):CD015025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015025.
2
Rising antimicrobial resistance: an evolving epidemic in a pandemic.日益增长的抗菌药物耐药性:大流行中的一种不断演变的流行病。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e419-e420. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00173-7. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Combined influence of practice guidelines and prospective audit and feedback stewardship on antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and empyema in children: 2012 to 2016.
The role of the clinical pharmacist in antimicrobial stewardship in Asia: A review.
临床药师在亚洲抗菌药物管理中的作用:综述
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 7;2(1):e176. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.310. eCollection 2022.
实践指南与前瞻性审核及反馈管理对2012年至2016年儿童社区获得性肺炎和脓胸抗菌治疗的综合影响
Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jun 30;26(4):234-241. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxaa066. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Using Audit and Feedback to Improve Antimicrobial Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study in the Veterans Health Administration.利用审核与反馈改善急诊科抗菌药物处方:退伍军人健康管理局的一项多中心准实验研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 14;8(6):ofab186. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab186. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities/Programs in the United Kingdom.评估新冠疫情对英国抗菌药物管理活动/项目的影响。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;10(2):110. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020110.
6
Effect of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial.托珠单抗对重症或危重症 2019 冠状病毒病患者 15 天临床结局的影响:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 20;372:n84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n84.
7
Antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19: rapid review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 患者的抗生素处方:快速综述和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):520-531. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.018. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
8
Loopholes in the Research Ethics System? Informed Consent Waivers in Cluster Randomized Trials with Individual-Level Intervention.研究伦理体系的漏洞?个体干预的整群随机试验中的知情同意豁免。
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Nov;42(6):21-28. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500071.
9
High-impact RCTs without prospective informed consent: a systematic review.高影响力 RCT 无前瞻性知情同意:系统评价。
J Investig Med. 2020 Dec;68(8):1341-1348. doi: 10.1136/jim-2020-001481. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
Antimicrobial Stewardship at the Core of COVID-19 Response Efforts: Implications for Sustaining and Building Programs.抗菌药物管理是新冠疫情应对工作的核心:对维持和建立相关项目的启示
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2020;22(9):23. doi: 10.1007/s11908-020-00734-x. Epub 2020 Jul 3.