• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维评估 III 类错(牙合)患者的面部不对称。第 1 部分:评估术后结果的回顾性研究。

Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes.

机构信息

Discipline of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Computer Science, Chu Hai College of Higher Education, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jul;26(7):4947-4966. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04463-4. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-022-04463-4
PMID:35320382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9276556/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to determine the site and severity of maxillomandibular asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery in asymmetric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Presurgery and postsurgery cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of 21 facial asymmetry patients (7 males and 14 females, mean age: 23.0 ± 3.36 years) with soft tissue chin deviation ≥ 3 mm who had undergone bimaxillary surgery were evaluated. Seven midline and twenty bilateral hard tissue landmarks were identified for the evaluation of facial asymmetry and outcomes were assessed against age- and gender-matched control subjects.

RESULTS

In the asymmetry group, bilateral landmarks exhibited significant deviation in the mandible and midface regions. Before surgery, asymmetry was more severe at the mandibular midline and sites close to it, in the asymmetry group. Bimaxillary surgery proved to be highly effective, with a significant correction of the menton to a clinically normal value (2.90 mm, p < 0.001). After surgery, significant residual asymmetry was observed at the mental foramen (p = 0.001) in the R-L direction. Moreover, significant asymmetry persisted at the sigmoid notch (p = 0.001) in the S-I direction.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular midline landmarks and chin peripheral regions contribute significantly to overall facial asymmetry characteristics. Despite significant correction after bimaxillary surgery, asymmetry persisted at several sites, thereby requiring secondary correction. Comprehensive 3D presurgical planning is central for asymmetry correction in a single surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The present study specifies the location of residual asymmetry sites and advocates the correction of those sites during initial surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定不对称患者正颌手术后颌面部不对称的部位和严重程度。

材料和方法

评估了 21 例软组织颏偏距≥3mm 的面部不对称患者(7 名男性和 14 名女性,平均年龄:23.0±3.36 岁)的术前和术后锥形束 CT(CBCT)数据。为评估面部不对称,确定了 7 个中线和 20 个双侧硬组织标志点,并将结果与年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行比较。

结果

在不对称组中,下颌骨和中面部的双侧标志点均存在明显的偏斜。术前,不对称组下颌骨中线及其附近部位的不对称更为严重。双颌手术效果显著,下颌前突明显矫正至临床正常值(2.90mm,p<0.001)。术后,颏孔(p=0.001)在 R-L 方向仍存在显著的残余不对称,此外,乙状切迹(p=0.001)在 S-I 方向仍存在显著的不对称。

结论

下颌骨中线标志点和颏部周围区域对面部不对称特征有重要贡献。尽管双颌手术后有明显的矫正,但仍有几个部位存在不对称,因此需要进行二次矫正。全面的 3D 术前规划是单手术中纠正不对称的关键。

临床相关性

本研究明确了残余不对称部位的位置,并主张在初次手术中纠正这些部位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f269/9276556/e3fb8d5bd25f/784_2022_4463_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f269/9276556/bbaecf9d6bee/784_2022_4463_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f269/9276556/90dc77a1e6cf/784_2022_4463_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f269/9276556/e3fb8d5bd25f/784_2022_4463_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f269/9276556/bbaecf9d6bee/784_2022_4463_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f269/9276556/90dc77a1e6cf/784_2022_4463_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f269/9276556/e3fb8d5bd25f/784_2022_4463_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes.三维评估 III 类错(牙合)患者的面部不对称。第 1 部分:评估术后结果的回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jul;26(7):4947-4966. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04463-4. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.双颌手术治疗 III 类畸形后面部不对称的部位和严重程度:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 23;28(6):334. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05729-9.
3
Type of mandibular asymmetry affects changes and outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry.下颌骨不对称的类型会影响 III 类不对称的双颌手术的变化和结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):1077-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04092-3. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
4
Improved lip esthetics in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after isolated mandibular orthognathic surgery.孤立性下颌骨正颌手术后,骨骼 III 类错牙合和面部不对称患者的唇部美学改善。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 May;161(5):e407-e415. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?在III类面部不对称患者中,二维与三维手术模拟相比,哪种能产生更好的手术效果?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;47(8):1022-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Treatment outcome of bimaxillary surgery for asymmetric skeletal class II deformity.双颌手术治疗不对称性骨骼 II 类畸形的治疗效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2462-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
7
Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?不对称性下颌前突的骨骼手术会影响软组织轮廓和厚度吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;71(9):1577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
8
Volumetric changes in the upper airway after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions: a case series study using 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.针对骨性III类错牙合畸形行双颌手术后上气道的容积变化:一项使用三维锥形束计算机断层扫描的病例系列研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;70(12):2867-75. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.使用三维计算机断层扫描对面部不对称进行形态学评估和分类。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
10
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估面部软硬组织不对称性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Growth Prediction in Orthodontics: ASystematic Review of Past Methods up to Artificial Intelligence.正畸学中的生长预测:对直至人工智能的既往方法的系统评价。
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 3;12(8):1023. doi: 10.3390/children12081023.
2
Determining post-orthognathic surgery profile: A validation study on the potential of modified chin point as a reliable predictor.确定正颌外科手术后的面部轮廓:关于改良颏点作为可靠预测指标潜力的验证研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0329535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329535. eCollection 2025.
3
Automated landmark-based mid-sagittal plane: reliability for 3-dimensional mandibular asymmetry assessment on head CT scans.

本文引用的文献

1
Similarity index for intuitive assessment of three-dimensional facial asymmetry.直观评估三维面部不对称的相似指数。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47477-x.
2
3D superimposition of craniofacial imaging-The utility of multicentre collaborations.颅颌面成像的三维叠加——多中心合作的实用性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):213-220. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12281.
3
Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse dental compensation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry.
基于自动地标点的正中矢状面:头部CT扫描三维下颌骨不对称评估的可靠性
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 26;29(6):311. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06397-z.
4
Comparison of Mirroring and Overlapping Analysis and Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Spatial Angle Wireframe Template in Evaluating Facial Asymmetry.镜像与重叠分析及三维软组织空间角度线框模板在评估面部不对称性中的比较
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;12(1):79. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010079.
5
Predicting optimal patient-specific postoperative facial landmarks for patients with craniomaxillofacial deformities.预测颅颌面畸形患者最佳的个体化术后面部分区标志点。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Nov;53(11):934-941. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.双颌手术治疗 III 类畸形后面部不对称的部位和严重程度:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 23;28(6):334. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05729-9.
7
Predicting Optimal Patient-Specific Postoperative Facial Landmarks for Patients with Craniomaxillofacial Deformities.预测颅颌面畸形患者术后最佳个体化面部标志点
medRxiv. 2023 Dec 14:2023.12.13.23299919. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.13.23299919.
8
Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in class III subjects, part 2: evaluating asymmetry index and asymmetry scores.III类错颌患者面部不对称的三维评估,第2部分:评估不对称指数和不对称评分。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):5813-5826. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05193-x. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
9
3-dimensional analysis of hard- and soft-tissue symmetry in a Chinese population.中国人颌面软硬组织对称性的三维分析
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03163-z.
10
Hard and Soft Tissue Asymmetry in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.骨性III类错颌畸形患者的软硬组织不对称性:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;13(5):869. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050869.
骨骼Ⅲ类错颌畸形伴面部不对称患者横向牙齿代偿的锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
Korean J Orthod. 2018 Nov;48(6):357-366. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.6.357. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
4
Assessing the outcome of orthognathic surgery by three-dimensional soft tissue analysis.通过三维软组织分析评估正颌外科手术的效果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;47(12):1587-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
Treatment outcome of bimaxillary surgery for asymmetric skeletal class II deformity.双颌手术治疗不对称性骨骼 II 类畸形的治疗效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2462-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
6
Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.下颌不对称的三维评估:一种新分类及三维头影测量分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;47(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 8.
7
Reliability of three-dimensional anterior cranial base superimposition methods for assessment of overall hard tissue changes: A systematic review.三维前颅底重叠方法评估整体硬组织变化的可靠性:系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):233-245. doi: 10.2319/071217-468.1. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
8
Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.基于标志点、基于表面和基于体素的 3D 锥形束计算机断层扫描叠加方法的准确性和可靠性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Nov;20(4):227-236. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12205. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
9
Analysis of Facial Asymmetry.面部不对称分析
Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015 Apr;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2015.16.1.1. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
10
Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation.双侧矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术矫正颏点偏差后下颌残余不对称的综合分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 29;11(8):e0161601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161601. eCollection 2016.