RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain.
Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Aug;31(8):827-839. doi: 10.1002/pds.5432. Epub 2022 May 13.
We examined the effect of olodaterol on the risk of myocardial ischaemia, cardiac arrhythmia, and all-cause mortality compared with use of other long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs). Channelling bias was also explored.
This Danish population-based cohort study used data linked from registries of hospital diagnoses, outpatient dispensings, and deaths. It included patients (aged ≥40 years) with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who initiated olodaterol or another LABA. Using matching and propensity score (PS) stratification, we calculated adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) using Poisson regression, followed by several additional analyses to evaluate and control channelling bias.
The IRRs of cardiac arrhythmias or myocardial ischaemia among users of olodaterol (n = 14 239) compared to users of other LABAs (n = 51 167) ranged from 0.96 to 1.65 in various analyses, although some estimates had low precision. Initial analysis suggested an increased risk for death with olodaterol compared with other LABAs (IRR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.44-1.84). Because olodaterol prescribing was associated with COPD severity, the mortality association was attenuated by using different methods of tighter confounding control: the IRRs were 1.26 (95% CI, 0.97-1.64) among LABA-naïve LABA/LAMA users without recent COPD hospitalisation; 1.27 (95% CI, 1.03-1.57) in a population with additional trimming from the tails of the PS distribution; and 1.32 (95% CI, 1.19-1.48) after applying overlap-weights analysis.
Olodaterol users had a similar risk for cardiac arrhythmias or myocardial ischaemia as other LABA users. The observed excess all-cause mortality associated with olodaterol use could be due to uncontrolled channelling bias.
我们研究了奥洛达特罗与其他长效β2-激动剂(LABA)相比,对心肌缺血、心律失常和全因死亡率风险的影响。同时还探讨了定向选择偏倚。
本项丹麦基于人群的队列研究使用了来自医院诊断、门诊配药和死亡登记处的数据链接。它纳入了诊断为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)且开始使用奥洛达特罗或其他 LABA 的患者(年龄≥40 岁)。使用匹配和倾向评分(PS)分层,我们使用泊松回归计算了调整后的发病率比值比(IRR),随后进行了多项额外分析,以评估和控制定向选择偏倚。
在各种分析中,奥洛达特罗使用者(n=14239)与其他 LABA 使用者(n=51167)相比,心律失常或心肌缺血的 IRR 范围为 0.96 至 1.65,但某些估计值的精度较低。初步分析表明,与其他 LABA 相比,奥洛达特罗的死亡风险增加(IRR,1.63;95%CI,1.44-1.84)。由于奥洛达特罗的处方与 COPD 严重程度相关,因此使用不同的严格混杂控制方法可减轻与死亡率相关的关联:在未使用过 LABA/LAMA 的 LABA 使用者中,无近期 COPD 住院史的人群中,IRR 为 1.26(95%CI,0.97-1.64);在 PS 分布尾部进一步修剪的人群中,IRR 为 1.27(95%CI,1.03-1.57);在应用重叠权重分析后,IRR 为 1.32(95%CI,1.19-1.48)。
奥洛达特罗使用者发生心律失常或心肌缺血的风险与其他 LABA 使用者相似。与奥洛达特罗使用相关的观察到的全因死亡率过高,可能归因于未控制的定向选择偏倚。