Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Faculty of Science, School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 May 20;17:1205-1217. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S358927. eCollection 2022.
Despite ample evidence underpinning the efficacy of β-agonists in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the occurrence of β- and β-adrenoceptors in the heart suggests that β-agonists may have deleterious cardiac effects. We investigated the association between new users of long-or short-acting β-agonists (LABA or SABA) or ICS (inhaled corticosteroids)/LABA and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
A nested case-control analysis was conducted using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink of patients with asthma, COPD or asthma-COPD overlap with initial treatment of LABA, SABA, ICS/LABA, ICS, long-or short-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA or SAMA) between 01 January 1998 and 31 July 2018. The primary outcome was MACE, defined as the first occurrence of stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or cardiovascular death. Each case was matched with up to 10 controls on age, sex, date of cohort-entry, and duration of follow-up. The risk of MACE associated with β-agonists was estimated using conditional logistic regression after controlling for potential confounders.
The cohort included 180,567 new users of β-agonists, ICS, SAMA, or LAMA. Among asthmatics, β-agonists were not associated with the risk of MACE (SABA vs ICS: HR 1.29 [0.96-1.73]; ICS/LABA vs ICS, HR 0.75 [0.33-1.73]). In contrast, among COPD patients, LABA (HR, 2.38 [1.04-5.47]), SABA (HR, 2.02 [1.13-3.59]) and ICS/LABA (HR, 2.08 [1.04-4.16]) users had an increased risk of MACE compared with SAMA users. Among patients with asthma-COPD overlap, SABA (HR, 2.57 [1.26-5.24]) was associated with an increased risk of MACE compared with ICS.
In conclusion, initiation of LABA, SABA, or ICS/LABA in COPD or SABA in asthma-COPD overlap is associated with increased risk of MACE. No associations were observed among patients with asthma.
尽管β-激动剂在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中的疗效有充分证据支持,但β-和β-肾上腺素受体在心脏中的存在表明β-激动剂可能对心脏有不良影响。我们研究了新使用长效或短效β-激动剂(LABA 或 SABA)或吸入皮质类固醇/ LABA(ICS/LABA)的患者与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关联。
使用英国临床实践研究数据链接,对 1998 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 31 日期间接受 LABA、SABA、ICS/LABA、ICS、长效或短效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA 或 SAMA)初始治疗的哮喘、COPD 或哮喘-COPD 重叠患者进行嵌套病例对照分析。主要结局为 MACE,定义为首次发生中风、心力衰竭、心肌梗死、心律失常或心血管死亡。每个病例与年龄、性别、队列入组日期和随访时间匹配的最多 10 个对照进行匹配。在控制潜在混杂因素后,使用条件逻辑回归估计β-激动剂与 MACE 相关的风险。
该队列包括 180567 名新使用β-激动剂、ICS、SAMA 或 LAMA 的患者。在哮喘患者中,β-激动剂与 MACE 的风险无关(SABA 与 ICS:HR 1.29 [0.96-1.73];ICS/LABA 与 ICS:HR 0.75 [0.33-1.73])。相比之下,在 COPD 患者中,LABA(HR,2.38 [1.04-5.47])、SABA(HR,2.02 [1.13-3.59])和 ICS/LABA(HR,2.08 [1.04-4.16])使用者与 SAMA 使用者相比,MACE 的风险增加。在哮喘-COPD 重叠患者中,SABA(HR,2.57 [1.26-5.24])与 MACE 风险增加相关,与 ICS 相比。
总之,COPD 中 LABA、SABA 或 ICS/LABA 的起始治疗或哮喘-COPD 重叠中 SABA 的起始治疗与 MACE 风险增加相关。在哮喘患者中未观察到相关性。