A Randomized Comparative Study on Median and Paramedian Approaches for Subarachnoid Block using Sprotte Needle in the Cesarean Section: Quest for the Best.

BACKGROUND

Since 1898 when August Bier, introduced spinal analgesia, there is lot of advancement made in the technique. There are various approaches and techniques for subarachnoid block.

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare median and paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery using Sprotte needle in terms of number of attempts, success rate, adverse effects, and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients were randomly divided into two equal groups and underwent subarachnoid block in median and paramedical block for elective cesarean section.

RESULTS

There is no significant difference between the two groups. Mean with standard deviation in the number of attempts for subarachnoid block through media and paramedian approach is 1.18 ± 0.48 and 1.06 ± 0.24, respectively ( = 0.51). The incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and lower backache was insignificant in both the groups ( = 0.218 and 0.646, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Paramedian approach should not be considered as a reserve technique for spinal anesthesia and can be used as popularly as the median approach.